COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in rural setting of Western India: A cross-sectional study

Shardhanjali Sinha, Antriksha Sen, Astha Ranjan
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in rural setting of Western India: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Shardhanjali Sinha, Antriksha Sen, Astha Ranjan","doi":"10.4103/amhs.amhs_57_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: The low acceptance rate of the vaccine in rural India has been acting as a hurdle to achieving herd immunity against multiple active variants of coronavirus. A large section of the rural population is prone to COVID-19 infection due to their negative perception of vaccination and their inability to access it. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate acceptance rate of the vaccine along with the major factors determining the non-receptivity of the COVID-19 vaccine among rural people. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in rural Rajasthan from August to November 2021. Out of 138 participants, 110 rural adults from different villages who were not yet vaccinated were interviewed using a semi-structured schedule. The characteristics of participants and factors determining COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy were assessed using MS Excel 2021 and STATA 13.1. Results: The side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine were the major reason for hesitancy among respondents (71%). Many respondents (51%) reported that the vaccine portal was not user-friendly and not working properly; in addition, the volatility of the network makes slot booking more difficult. Due to the shortage of vaccines and the absence or low numbers of medical staff, some respondents (>40%) attributed the inefficacy of health care centers as a cause for not getting vaccinated. Fifty-three percentage of respondents rejected the vaccine due to political orientation, and ~40% believed that the vaccine was being tested first on poor rural people. Lack of awareness and ignorance led to half of the population postponing it. Thirty-five percentage of them argued that the vaccine does not cure COVID-19, and 37% feared that the vaccine could lead to death. Many women (56%) were dependent on men or elders for access to health care centers and considered it necessary for men only. Conclusion: The findings of this study highlight the major hurdles to ensuring the equitable coverage of vaccination in rural India, which reflect the urgent need for awareness campaigns and door-to-door vaccination to prevent community transmission among the rural population of India.","PeriodicalId":8296,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/amhs.amhs_57_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: The low acceptance rate of the vaccine in rural India has been acting as a hurdle to achieving herd immunity against multiple active variants of coronavirus. A large section of the rural population is prone to COVID-19 infection due to their negative perception of vaccination and their inability to access it. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate acceptance rate of the vaccine along with the major factors determining the non-receptivity of the COVID-19 vaccine among rural people. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in rural Rajasthan from August to November 2021. Out of 138 participants, 110 rural adults from different villages who were not yet vaccinated were interviewed using a semi-structured schedule. The characteristics of participants and factors determining COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy were assessed using MS Excel 2021 and STATA 13.1. Results: The side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine were the major reason for hesitancy among respondents (71%). Many respondents (51%) reported that the vaccine portal was not user-friendly and not working properly; in addition, the volatility of the network makes slot booking more difficult. Due to the shortage of vaccines and the absence or low numbers of medical staff, some respondents (>40%) attributed the inefficacy of health care centers as a cause for not getting vaccinated. Fifty-three percentage of respondents rejected the vaccine due to political orientation, and ~40% believed that the vaccine was being tested first on poor rural people. Lack of awareness and ignorance led to half of the population postponing it. Thirty-five percentage of them argued that the vaccine does not cure COVID-19, and 37% feared that the vaccine could lead to death. Many women (56%) were dependent on men or elders for access to health care centers and considered it necessary for men only. Conclusion: The findings of this study highlight the major hurdles to ensuring the equitable coverage of vaccination in rural India, which reflect the urgent need for awareness campaigns and door-to-door vaccination to prevent community transmission among the rural population of India.
印度西部农村地区COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫:一项横断面研究
背景与目的:在印度农村,疫苗的低接受率一直是实现针对多种活性冠状病毒变体的群体免疫的障碍。由于对疫苗接种的负面看法以及无法获得疫苗接种,很大一部分农村人口容易感染COVID-19。因此,本研究旨在评估疫苗的接受率,以及影响农村人群COVID-19疫苗不接受性的主要因素。方法:于2021年8月至11月在拉贾斯坦邦农村进行了一项以医院为基础的横断面研究。在138名参与者中,使用半结构化时间表对来自不同村庄的110名尚未接种疫苗的农村成年人进行了采访。使用MS Excel 2021和STATA 13.1对参与者的特征和决定COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫的因素进行评估。结果:新冠肺炎疫苗的副作用是受访者犹豫不决的主要原因(71%)。许多答复者(51%)报告说,疫苗门户网站不够用户友好,不能正常工作;此外,网络的波动性使得时段预订更加困难。部分受访者(>40%)认为,由于疫苗短缺和医护人员缺位或人数少,导致未接种疫苗的原因是卫生保健中心的效率低下。53%的答复者由于政治倾向而拒绝接种疫苗,约40%的人认为疫苗首先在贫穷的农村人口中进行试验。缺乏意识和无知导致一半的人口推迟了它。35%的人认为疫苗不能治愈COVID-19, 37%的人担心疫苗可能导致死亡。许多妇女(56%)依靠男性或老年人前往保健中心,认为只有男性才有必要。结论:本研究的结果突出了确保印度农村疫苗接种公平覆盖的主要障碍,这反映了迫切需要开展提高认识运动和挨家挨户接种疫苗,以防止印度农村人口中的社区传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信