EFFECTIVENESS OF COUGH ASSIST IN THE EXTUBATION OF ADULT PATIENTS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Giulia Montigiani, Davide Papi, Lorenzo Proietti, Beatrice Meucci, Mara Taddei, Luca Bucciardini, Mauro Di Bari
{"title":"EFFECTIVENESS OF COUGH ASSIST IN THE EXTUBATION OF ADULT PATIENTS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS","authors":"Giulia Montigiani, Davide Papi, Lorenzo Proietti, Beatrice Meucci, Mara Taddei, Luca Bucciardini, Mauro Di Bari","doi":"10.36017/jahc202351277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Intensive Care Unit (ICU), failure of extubation, resulting in the need for reintubation, mayoccur in 2-25% of Patients undergoing extubation[1].
 The purpose of this review and meta-analysiswas to determine the effectiveness of cough assist in improving success rates of extubation compared with standard treatment.
 Inclusion criteria were; Randomized Control Trials, which compared cough assist and conventional therapy in adult population in intensive care unit whith conventional therapy only. Outcomes representing the efficacy of the cough assist were: quantity and quality of secretions (weight, volume, and density), number of reintubation, indices of thoraco-pulmonary function.
 The search string produced 764 studies, and only 5 studies eligible for review. Overall, a total of 331 participants were enrolled in the five studies selected.
 Of the meta-analyzed outcomes, the calculation of the effect size for the weight of secretions is the one that gave the best results, while no statistical difference was found in the other outcomes. In none of the meta-analysis studies were observed adverse effects in the use of in-exsufflator.
 Our systematically review edsuggest sthatcough assist might be feasible and effective in patients intubated in ICU, but studies with larger sample sizes and well-defined outcomes are still required to obtain conclusive evidence.","PeriodicalId":14873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Health Care","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36017/jahc202351277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Intensive Care Unit (ICU), failure of extubation, resulting in the need for reintubation, mayoccur in 2-25% of Patients undergoing extubation[1]. The purpose of this review and meta-analysiswas to determine the effectiveness of cough assist in improving success rates of extubation compared with standard treatment. Inclusion criteria were; Randomized Control Trials, which compared cough assist and conventional therapy in adult population in intensive care unit whith conventional therapy only. Outcomes representing the efficacy of the cough assist were: quantity and quality of secretions (weight, volume, and density), number of reintubation, indices of thoraco-pulmonary function. The search string produced 764 studies, and only 5 studies eligible for review. Overall, a total of 331 participants were enrolled in the five studies selected. Of the meta-analyzed outcomes, the calculation of the effect size for the weight of secretions is the one that gave the best results, while no statistical difference was found in the other outcomes. In none of the meta-analysis studies were observed adverse effects in the use of in-exsufflator. Our systematically review edsuggest sthatcough assist might be feasible and effective in patients intubated in ICU, but studies with larger sample sizes and well-defined outcomes are still required to obtain conclusive evidence.
咳嗽辅助成人患者拔管的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
在重症监护病房(ICU), 2-25%的拔管患者可能出现拔管失败,导致需要重新插管[1]。本综述和荟萃分析的目的是确定与标准治疗相比,咳嗽辅助治疗在提高拔管成功率方面的有效性。 纳入标准为;随机对照试验,比较重症监护病房成人咳嗽辅助治疗和常规治疗与常规治疗。代表咳嗽辅助治疗效果的结果是:分泌物的数量和质量(重量、体积和密度)、再插管次数、胸肺功能指标。 搜索字符串产生了764项研究,只有5项研究符合审查条件。总的来说,共有331名参与者被纳入了所选的五项研究。 在meta分析的结果中,对分泌物重量的效应大小的计算给出了最好的结果,而在其他结果中没有发现统计学差异。在所有meta分析研究中,均未观察到使用呼气机的不良反应。 我们的系统综述表明,在ICU插管患者中,止咳辅助可能是可行和有效的,但仍需要更大样本量和明确结果的研究来获得结论性证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信