Critique of one-dimensional thought then and now. Confronting two critiques of ideology through a longer view of capitalist platformization

Daniel IBI
{"title":"Critique of one-dimensional thought then and now. Confronting two critiques of ideology through a longer view of capitalist platformization","authors":"Daniel IBI","doi":"10.3280/sc2023-065006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the often-overlooked critiques of ideology in analyses of current capitalism. Therefor the concept \"platform\" is adapted to the capitalist market structure itself, allowing to compare different phases of capitalism's plat-formization and corresponding critiques. Marcuse's and Zuboff's analyses serve as case studies. Both examine the triad of capitalism, technology and subjective experience, arguing that technology stabilizes domination. In Zuboff's version consensus is achieved, not least, through the manipulation carried out by a \"new priesthood\" that employs \"means of behavioral modification\". The article con-cludes that, due to feudalization tendencies, such theory of priestly deception may, to an extent, be justified.","PeriodicalId":493106,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia della comunicazione","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia della comunicazione","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/sc2023-065006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the often-overlooked critiques of ideology in analyses of current capitalism. Therefor the concept "platform" is adapted to the capitalist market structure itself, allowing to compare different phases of capitalism's plat-formization and corresponding critiques. Marcuse's and Zuboff's analyses serve as case studies. Both examine the triad of capitalism, technology and subjective experience, arguing that technology stabilizes domination. In Zuboff's version consensus is achieved, not least, through the manipulation carried out by a "new priesthood" that employs "means of behavioral modification". The article con-cludes that, due to feudalization tendencies, such theory of priestly deception may, to an extent, be justified.
对当时和现在的单向度思想的批判。从资本主义平台化的长远角度来面对两种对意识形态的批判
本文考察了在分析当前资本主义时经常被忽视的意识形态批评。因此,“平台”这个概念适用于资本主义市场结构本身,可以比较资本主义平台化的不同阶段和相应的批评。马尔库塞和祖伯夫的分析可以作为案例研究。两者都考察了资本主义、技术和主观经验的三位一体,认为技术稳定了统治。在祖博夫的版本中,共识的达成,尤其是通过“新神职人员”使用“行为矫正手段”进行的操纵。文章的结论是,由于封建倾向,这种祭司欺骗理论可能在一定程度上是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信