Paper Empires: Layers of Law in Colonial South Asia and the Indian Ocean

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY
Nandini Chatterjee, Alicia Schrikker, Dries Lyna
{"title":"Paper Empires: Layers of Law in Colonial South Asia and the Indian Ocean","authors":"Nandini Chatterjee, Alicia Schrikker, Dries Lyna","doi":"10.1017/s0738248023000081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Anthropologists and historians have recently underscored the ways in which European colonialism created novel regimes of legality and record-keeping, associated with ambitious and exclusive state-centered claims to both truth and rights, while being inevitably and constantly sucked into eddies of forgery and corruption. However, attention so far has been focused on English/European-language records and the colonial institutions that produced, stored, and deployed them. This has communicated a monolithic sense of power and normativity that unwittingly replicates the aspirations of colonial states. Drawing on eight case studies from in and around South Asia from the eighteenth to the twentieth centuries, we propose instead that the law of empires was rooted in the highly localized, often multilingual, and fragmented bureaucracies that produced its records. Here, historians of pre-colonial Indian regimes join hands with historians of British, Dutch, and French colonialism in order to unearth the genealogies of records written in Bengali, Marathi, Persian, Sinhala, and Tamil, as well as in French, Dutch, and English. This special issue collectively excavates the many layers, regimes, and languages in which legally effective records were produced by imperial regimes in South Asia and its much larger watery penumbra, the Indian Ocean.","PeriodicalId":17960,"journal":{"name":"Law and History Review","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0738248023000081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Anthropologists and historians have recently underscored the ways in which European colonialism created novel regimes of legality and record-keeping, associated with ambitious and exclusive state-centered claims to both truth and rights, while being inevitably and constantly sucked into eddies of forgery and corruption. However, attention so far has been focused on English/European-language records and the colonial institutions that produced, stored, and deployed them. This has communicated a monolithic sense of power and normativity that unwittingly replicates the aspirations of colonial states. Drawing on eight case studies from in and around South Asia from the eighteenth to the twentieth centuries, we propose instead that the law of empires was rooted in the highly localized, often multilingual, and fragmented bureaucracies that produced its records. Here, historians of pre-colonial Indian regimes join hands with historians of British, Dutch, and French colonialism in order to unearth the genealogies of records written in Bengali, Marathi, Persian, Sinhala, and Tamil, as well as in French, Dutch, and English. This special issue collectively excavates the many layers, regimes, and languages in which legally effective records were produced by imperial regimes in South Asia and its much larger watery penumbra, the Indian Ocean.
《纸上帝国:南亚和印度洋殖民地的法律层次》
人类学家和历史学家最近强调了欧洲殖民主义如何创造了新的合法性和记录保存制度,这些制度与雄心勃勃、以国家为中心的对真理和权利的排他要求有关,同时不可避免地、不断地卷入伪造和腐败的漩涡。然而,到目前为止,人们的注意力一直集中在英语/欧洲语言的记录以及制作、存储和部署这些记录的殖民机构上。这传达了一种整体的权力感和规范性,无意中复制了殖民国家的愿望。根据18世纪至20世纪南亚及其周边地区的八个案例研究,我们提出,帝国的法律根植于产生其记录的高度本地化、往往是多语言、碎片化的官僚机构。在这里,研究前殖民时期印度政权的历史学家与研究英国、荷兰和法国殖民主义的历史学家携手,发掘用孟加拉语、马拉地语、波斯语、僧伽罗语、泰米尔语以及法语、荷兰语和英语撰写的记录的家谱。本期特刊集体挖掘了南亚及其更大的水域半影地带——印度洋上的帝国政权所制作的具有法律效力的记录的许多层次、制度和语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Law and History Review (LHR), America"s leading legal history journal, encompasses American, European, and ancient legal history issues. The journal"s purpose is to further research in the fields of the social history of law and the history of legal ideas and institutions. LHR features articles, essays, commentaries by international authorities, and reviews of important books on legal history. American Society for Legal History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信