Review of the regulatory framework regarding the use of multifocal IOLs for cataract surgery.

A. D. Chuprov, A. О. Lositsky, N. A. Zhediale
{"title":"Review of the regulatory framework regarding the use of multifocal IOLs for cataract surgery.","authors":"A. D. Chuprov, A. О. Lositsky, N. A. Zhediale","doi":"10.21045/1811-0185-2023-7-85-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the increasing requirements for the quality of postoperative vision, the number of requests from patients for the implantation of a multifocal IOL is increasing, which makes it relevant to analyze the existing regulatory framework for the possibility and obligation to use this medical device in the provision of specialized medical care – surgical treatment of cataract within the framework of the state guarantees program. An analysis of the current regulatory framework showed that the existing regulatory framework allows the use of multifocal IOLs in the provision of medical services under the state guarantees program, however, it does not give the patient the right to choose, and makes considering the patient’s desire to implant this particular type of medical device is not mandatory when planning surgery. Considering the requirements of mandatory informed voluntary consent when receiving a medical service, the patient must be informed about the implantation or refusal to implant this type of medical device when providing him with specialized medical care. Most of the analyzed medical devices – IOLs with multifocal properties – are registered in the Russian Federation as “Intraocular lens for the posterior chamber of the eye, pseudophakic”, and not “Intraocular lens for the posterior chamber of the eye, pseudophakic, with increased depth of focus”. There is both a clinical need for changes (Clinical guidelines), and an organizational need to identify a group of operations, including with the application of additional coefficients to the tariff as part of the payment for medical services included in the program of state guarantees.","PeriodicalId":270155,"journal":{"name":"Manager Zdravookhranenia","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manager Zdravookhranenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21045/1811-0185-2023-7-85-90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the increasing requirements for the quality of postoperative vision, the number of requests from patients for the implantation of a multifocal IOL is increasing, which makes it relevant to analyze the existing regulatory framework for the possibility and obligation to use this medical device in the provision of specialized medical care – surgical treatment of cataract within the framework of the state guarantees program. An analysis of the current regulatory framework showed that the existing regulatory framework allows the use of multifocal IOLs in the provision of medical services under the state guarantees program, however, it does not give the patient the right to choose, and makes considering the patient’s desire to implant this particular type of medical device is not mandatory when planning surgery. Considering the requirements of mandatory informed voluntary consent when receiving a medical service, the patient must be informed about the implantation or refusal to implant this type of medical device when providing him with specialized medical care. Most of the analyzed medical devices – IOLs with multifocal properties – are registered in the Russian Federation as “Intraocular lens for the posterior chamber of the eye, pseudophakic”, and not “Intraocular lens for the posterior chamber of the eye, pseudophakic, with increased depth of focus”. There is both a clinical need for changes (Clinical guidelines), and an organizational need to identify a group of operations, including with the application of additional coefficients to the tariff as part of the payment for medical services included in the program of state guarantees.
关于白内障手术中使用多焦点人工晶状体的监管框架综述。
考虑到对术后视力质量的要求越来越高,患者要求植入多焦点IOL的数量也在增加,因此有必要分析现有的监管框架,以确定在国家保障方案框架内提供专业医疗护理-白内障手术治疗时使用这种医疗设备的可能性和义务。对当前监管框架的分析表明,现有监管框架允许在国家保障方案下提供医疗服务时使用多焦点iol,但是,它没有赋予患者选择的权利,并且使得在计划手术时考虑患者植入这种特定类型医疗设备的愿望不是强制性的。考虑到接受医疗服务时强制知情自愿同意的要求,在向患者提供专门医疗护理时,必须告知其植入或拒绝植入这类医疗装置。所分析的大多数医疗器械——具有多焦点特性的人工晶状体——在俄罗斯联邦登记为"眼后腔人工晶状体,假性晶状体",而不是"眼后腔人工晶状体,假性晶状体,焦深增加"。临床需要进行改革(临床指南),组织需要确定一组业务,包括在国家保障方案所包括的医疗服务支付中对关税适用额外系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信