FEBench: A Benchmark for Real-Time Relational Data Feature Extraction

IF 2.6 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Xuanhe Zhou, Cheng Chen, Kunyi Li, Bingsheng He, Mian Lu, Qiaosheng Liu, Wei Huang, Guoliang Li, Zhao Zheng, Yuqiang Chen
{"title":"FEBench: A Benchmark for Real-Time Relational Data Feature Extraction","authors":"Xuanhe Zhou, Cheng Chen, Kunyi Li, Bingsheng He, Mian Lu, Qiaosheng Liu, Wei Huang, Guoliang Li, Zhao Zheng, Yuqiang Chen","doi":"10.14778/3611540.3611550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the use of online AI inference services rapidly expands in various applications (e.g., fraud detection in banking, product recommendation in e-commerce), real-time feature extraction (RTFE) systems have been developed to compute the requested features from incoming data tuples in ultra-low latency. Similar to relational databases, these RTFE procedures can be expressed using SQL-like languages. However, there is a lack of research on the workload characteristics and specialized benchmarks for RTFE, especially in comparison with existing database workloads and benchmarks (e.g., concurrent transactions in TPC-C). In this paper, we study the RTFE workload characteristics using over one hundred real datasets from open repositories (e.g. Kaggle, Tianchi, UCI ML, KiltHub) and those from 4Paradigm. The study highlights the significant differences between RTFE workloads and existing database benchmarks in terms of application scenarios, operator distributions, and query structures. Based on these findings, we propose to develop a realtime feature extraction benchmark named FEBench based on the four important criteria for a domain-specific benchmark proposed by Jim Gray. FEBench consists of selected representative datasets, query templates, and an online request simulator. We use FEBench to evaluate the effectiveness of feature extraction systems including OpenMLDB and Flink and find that each system exhibits distinct advantages and limitations in terms of overall latency, tail latency, and concurrency performance.","PeriodicalId":54220,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vldb Endowment","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vldb Endowment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14778/3611540.3611550","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As the use of online AI inference services rapidly expands in various applications (e.g., fraud detection in banking, product recommendation in e-commerce), real-time feature extraction (RTFE) systems have been developed to compute the requested features from incoming data tuples in ultra-low latency. Similar to relational databases, these RTFE procedures can be expressed using SQL-like languages. However, there is a lack of research on the workload characteristics and specialized benchmarks for RTFE, especially in comparison with existing database workloads and benchmarks (e.g., concurrent transactions in TPC-C). In this paper, we study the RTFE workload characteristics using over one hundred real datasets from open repositories (e.g. Kaggle, Tianchi, UCI ML, KiltHub) and those from 4Paradigm. The study highlights the significant differences between RTFE workloads and existing database benchmarks in terms of application scenarios, operator distributions, and query structures. Based on these findings, we propose to develop a realtime feature extraction benchmark named FEBench based on the four important criteria for a domain-specific benchmark proposed by Jim Gray. FEBench consists of selected representative datasets, query templates, and an online request simulator. We use FEBench to evaluate the effectiveness of feature extraction systems including OpenMLDB and Flink and find that each system exhibits distinct advantages and limitations in terms of overall latency, tail latency, and concurrency performance.
FEBench:一个实时关系数据特征提取的基准
随着在线人工智能推理服务在各种应用(例如,银行欺诈检测,电子商务产品推荐)中的使用迅速扩展,实时特征提取(RTFE)系统已经开发出来,以超低延迟从传入数据元组中计算所请求的特征。与关系数据库类似,这些RTFE过程可以使用类似sql的语言来表示。然而,缺乏对RTFE工作负载特征和专门基准的研究,特别是与现有数据库工作负载和基准(例如,TPC-C中的并发事务)进行比较。在本文中,我们使用来自开放存储库(例如Kaggle, Tianchi, UCI ML, KiltHub)和4Paradigm的100多个真实数据集研究RTFE工作负载特征。该研究强调了RTFE工作负载与现有数据库基准在应用程序场景、操作符分布和查询结构方面的显著差异。基于这些发现,我们建议基于Jim Gray提出的特定领域基准的四个重要标准开发一个实时特征提取基准,名为FEBench。FEBench由选定的代表性数据集、查询模板和在线请求模拟器组成。我们使用FEBench来评估包括OpenMLDB和Flink在内的特征提取系统的有效性,并发现每个系统在总体延迟、尾部延迟和并发性能方面都表现出不同的优势和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Vldb Endowment
Proceedings of the Vldb Endowment Computer Science-General Computer Science
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the VLDB (PVLDB) welcomes original research papers on a broad range of research topics related to all aspects of data management, where systems issues play a significant role, such as data management system technology and information management infrastructures, including their very large scale of experimentation, novel architectures, and demanding applications as well as their underpinning theory. The scope of a submission for PVLDB is also described by the subject areas given below. Moreover, the scope of PVLDB is restricted to scientific areas that are covered by the combined expertise on the submission’s topic of the journal’s editorial board. Finally, the submission’s contributions should build on work already published in data management outlets, e.g., PVLDB, VLDBJ, ACM SIGMOD, IEEE ICDE, EDBT, ACM TODS, IEEE TKDE, and go beyond a syntactic citation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信