Gender differences in controlling knee wobbling: implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury risk

IF 0.1 0 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Akino AOKI, Szu-Ping LEE, Kazuyoshi GAMADA
{"title":"Gender differences in controlling knee wobbling: implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury risk","authors":"Akino AOKI, Szu-Ping LEE, Kazuyoshi GAMADA","doi":"10.23736/s0393-3660.22.04973-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Identifying high-risk movement pattern is necessary to prevent non-contact ACL injury. Previous studies identified only knee position at initial contact and peak flexion during landing as risk factors for ACL injury. Establishing further assessments to detect deficits in knee neuromuscular control is useful for more effective determination of ACL injury risk in female athletes. The purpose of this study was to examine gender differences in basketball players regarding knee valgus angle and dynamic knee wobbling.METHODS: Ten participants were recruited from intercollegiate basketball teams. Two 2D-videocameras were used to capture the participants performing 3 trials of controlled single-leg squat. An incident of knee wobbling was defined as when the valgus angular velocity crossed zero. Frontal plane projection angle (FPPA), valgus excursion range, and frontal angular velocity divided by sagittal angular velocity (F/S Ratio) during wobbling were compared between genders.RESULTS: The valgus excursion angle was significantly larger in females than males (0.8° vs. 0.1°, P=0.011), and the F/S Ratio was significantly larger in females than males (212.1% vs. 16.7%, P=0.011). There was no difference in the FPPA or the frequency of knee wobbling between males and females.CONCLUSIONS: Greater knee excursion angle and knee wobbling during a single-leg squat test were observed in female basketball players. To determine the risk of ACL injury in female athletes during screening, knee wobbling and F/S Ratio during the eccentric phase of single-leg squats can be more useful than static angular assessments.","PeriodicalId":12806,"journal":{"name":"Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/s0393-3660.22.04973-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identifying high-risk movement pattern is necessary to prevent non-contact ACL injury. Previous studies identified only knee position at initial contact and peak flexion during landing as risk factors for ACL injury. Establishing further assessments to detect deficits in knee neuromuscular control is useful for more effective determination of ACL injury risk in female athletes. The purpose of this study was to examine gender differences in basketball players regarding knee valgus angle and dynamic knee wobbling.METHODS: Ten participants were recruited from intercollegiate basketball teams. Two 2D-videocameras were used to capture the participants performing 3 trials of controlled single-leg squat. An incident of knee wobbling was defined as when the valgus angular velocity crossed zero. Frontal plane projection angle (FPPA), valgus excursion range, and frontal angular velocity divided by sagittal angular velocity (F/S Ratio) during wobbling were compared between genders.RESULTS: The valgus excursion angle was significantly larger in females than males (0.8° vs. 0.1°, P=0.011), and the F/S Ratio was significantly larger in females than males (212.1% vs. 16.7%, P=0.011). There was no difference in the FPPA or the frequency of knee wobbling between males and females.CONCLUSIONS: Greater knee excursion angle and knee wobbling during a single-leg squat test were observed in female basketball players. To determine the risk of ACL injury in female athletes during screening, knee wobbling and F/S Ratio during the eccentric phase of single-leg squats can be more useful than static angular assessments.
控制膝摇晃的性别差异:对前交叉韧带损伤风险的影响
背景:确定高危运动模式对于预防非接触性前交叉韧带损伤是必要的。先前的研究仅确定初始接触时的膝关节位置和着地时的峰值屈曲是前交叉韧带损伤的危险因素。建立进一步的评估来检测膝关节神经肌肉控制的缺陷,有助于更有效地确定女运动员前交叉韧带损伤的风险。摘要本研究旨在探讨篮球运动员在膝关节外翻角度及膝关节动态摆动方面的性别差异。方法:从校际篮球队招募10名参与者。使用两台2d摄像机捕捉参与者进行3次受控单腿深蹲试验。当外翻角速度超过零时,定义为膝关节摆动事件。比较两性摇摆时的正面平面投影角(FPPA)、外翻偏移范围、正面角速度/矢状角速度(F/S Ratio)。结果:女性外翻偏移角度明显大于男性(0.8°比0.1°,P=0.011), F/S比明显大于男性(212.1%比16.7%,P=0.011)。男性和女性在FPPA和膝盖抖动的频率上没有差异。结论:在单腿深蹲试验中,女性篮球运动员观察到更大的膝盖偏移角度和膝盖摆动。在筛选过程中,为了确定女运动员ACL损伤的风险,单腿深蹲偏心阶段的膝盖摆动和F/S比可能比静态角度评估更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
136
期刊介绍: The journal Gazzetta Medica Italiana publishes scientific papers on medicine and pharmacology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信