Experimental investigation of viscous oil–water–sand flow in horizontal pipes: Flow patterns and pressure gradient

IF 4.2 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Tarek Ganat
{"title":"Experimental investigation of viscous oil–water–sand flow in horizontal pipes: Flow patterns and pressure gradient","authors":"Tarek Ganat","doi":"10.1016/j.petlm.2023.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fluid production from unconsolidated reservoirs often leads in sand production, which poses a number of issues. Sand deposition in flowlines can result in significant pressure dips, pipe and facility damage, and obstructions that decrease productivity. More research is needed to understand the movement and deposition of sand in oil–water–sand (O–W–S) fluxes. This article focuses on O–W–S flows in a 6-meter-long horizontal pipe with an inner diameter of 0.0381 m. The study looks at the flow behavior of high viscosity oil–water (O–W), water–sand (W–S), and oil–water–sand (O–W–S) flows. Experiments were carried out at 250 psig pressure in a laboratory flow test facility using various heavy synthetic oils (viscosities ranging from 3500 cP to 7500 cP at 25°C) and tap water. The sand concentration varied from 1% to 10%, with an average sand particle diameter of 145 μm and material density of 2630 kg/m<sup>3</sup>. Water cuts ranged from 0.0 to 1.0. The experimental results revealed a minor change in pressure gradient between (O–W) and (O–W–S) flows. However, increasing the sand concentration in (O–W–S) flow resulted in higher pressure losses. The reduction factor of pressure gradient indicated that the highest decrease in pressure drop occurred at higher superficial oil velocities. Furthermore, a direct relationship was observed between the reduction factor and the decrease in water cut. The results also showed that the minimum required transportation velocity for sand slurry decreased with increasing superficial oil velocity, while the minimum transportation condition increased with higher sand concentration. The comparison between the expected pressure gradient from Bannwart and McKibben et al. and the actual experimental data demonstrated significant accuracy for the oil viscosities and superficial oil velocities used in the study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37433,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum","volume":"10 2","pages":"Pages 275-293"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405656123000639/pdfft?md5=03f697400191bab413d488c867e4e0ac&pid=1-s2.0-S2405656123000639-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405656123000639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluid production from unconsolidated reservoirs often leads in sand production, which poses a number of issues. Sand deposition in flowlines can result in significant pressure dips, pipe and facility damage, and obstructions that decrease productivity. More research is needed to understand the movement and deposition of sand in oil–water–sand (O–W–S) fluxes. This article focuses on O–W–S flows in a 6-meter-long horizontal pipe with an inner diameter of 0.0381 m. The study looks at the flow behavior of high viscosity oil–water (O–W), water–sand (W–S), and oil–water–sand (O–W–S) flows. Experiments were carried out at 250 psig pressure in a laboratory flow test facility using various heavy synthetic oils (viscosities ranging from 3500 cP to 7500 cP at 25°C) and tap water. The sand concentration varied from 1% to 10%, with an average sand particle diameter of 145 μm and material density of 2630 kg/m3. Water cuts ranged from 0.0 to 1.0. The experimental results revealed a minor change in pressure gradient between (O–W) and (O–W–S) flows. However, increasing the sand concentration in (O–W–S) flow resulted in higher pressure losses. The reduction factor of pressure gradient indicated that the highest decrease in pressure drop occurred at higher superficial oil velocities. Furthermore, a direct relationship was observed between the reduction factor and the decrease in water cut. The results also showed that the minimum required transportation velocity for sand slurry decreased with increasing superficial oil velocity, while the minimum transportation condition increased with higher sand concentration. The comparison between the expected pressure gradient from Bannwart and McKibben et al. and the actual experimental data demonstrated significant accuracy for the oil viscosities and superficial oil velocities used in the study.

水平管道中粘性油-水-砂流动的实验研究:流动模式和压力梯度
未固结储层的流体生产往往会导致产砂,从而引发一系列问题。砂沉积在输油管道中会导致压力骤降、管道和设施损坏以及阻碍生产,从而降低生产率。要了解油-水-砂(O-W-S)流中砂的移动和沉积情况,还需要进行更多的研究。本文重点研究了内径为 0.0381 米的 6 米长水平管道中的油-水-砂流动。实验在压力为 250 psig 的实验室流量测试设备中进行,使用的是各种重质合成油(25°C 时粘度从 3500 cP 到 7500 cP 不等)和自来水。砂的浓度从 1% 到 10% 不等,平均砂粒直径为 145 μm,材料密度为 2630 kg/m3。切水量从 0.0 到 1.0 不等。实验结果表明,(O-W)流和(O-W-S)流之间的压力梯度变化不大。然而,增加(O-W-S)流中的砂浓度会导致更高的压力损失。压力梯度的降低系数表明,在表层油速较高时,压力降的降低幅度最大。此外,还观察到降低系数与减水量之间存在直接关系。结果还表明,砂浆所需的最小输送速度随着表层油速的增加而降低,而最小输送条件则随着砂浓度的增加而提高。Bannwart 和 McKibben 等人的预期压力梯度与实际实验数据之间的比较表明,研究中使用的油粘度和表层油速非常准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Petroleum
Petroleum Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
124 days
期刊介绍: Examples of appropriate topical areas that will be considered include the following: 1.comprehensive research on oil and gas reservoir (reservoir geology): -geological basis of oil and gas reservoirs -reservoir geochemistry -reservoir formation mechanism -reservoir identification methods and techniques 2.kinetics of oil and gas basins and analyses of potential oil and gas resources: -fine description factors of hydrocarbon accumulation -mechanism analysis on recovery and dynamic accumulation process -relationship between accumulation factors and the accumulation process -analysis of oil and gas potential resource 3.theories and methods for complex reservoir geophysical prospecting: -geophysical basis of deep geologic structures and background of hydrocarbon occurrence -geophysical prediction of deep and complex reservoirs -physical test analyses and numerical simulations of reservoir rocks -anisotropic medium seismic imaging theory and new technology for multiwave seismic exploration -o theories and methods for reservoir fluid geophysical identification and prediction 4.theories, methods, technology, and design for complex reservoir development: -reservoir percolation theory and application technology -field development theories and methods -theory and technology for enhancing recovery efficiency 5.working liquid for oil and gas wells and reservoir protection technology: -working chemicals and mechanics for oil and gas wells -reservoir protection technology 6.new techniques and technologies for oil and gas drilling and production: -under-balanced drilling/gas drilling -special-track well drilling -cementing and completion of oil and gas wells -engineering safety applications for oil and gas wells -new technology of fracture acidizing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信