Immediate versus MOdified DElayed coloanal anastomosis after total mesorectal excision: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Hani Bendib, Abdelkrim Anou, Nabil Djelali, Hind Oukrine, Hassan Alikhodja, Abdelghani Azzouz, Azeddine Djennaoui, Chemseddine Chekman
{"title":"Immediate versus MOdified DElayed coloanal anastomosis after total mesorectal excision: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Hani Bendib, Abdelkrim Anou, Nabil Djelali, Hind Oukrine, Hassan Alikhodja, Abdelghani Azzouz, Azeddine Djennaoui, Chemseddine Chekman","doi":"10.1097/md9.0000000000000286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICA) remains the standard technique for restoring the digestive tract after proctectomy for low rectal cancer. Often, it requires a temporary diversion stoma, thus increasing the risk of complications. Recent data have shown a great potential of the delayed coloanal anastomosis both in decreasing anastomosis morbidity and in avoiding ileostomy to the patients. More recently, a modified delayed coloanal anastomosis (mDCA) has been described and seems to have promising results. This study aims to determine whether mDCA is non-inferior to ICA. Methods: The IMODE trial is a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial designed to enroll 70 adults with mid or low rectal cancer. Participants are randomized to ICA or mDCA. The primary endpoint is the anastomotic fistulas rate at 6 months. Conclusions: The mDCA can constitute an interesting modality to restore the digestive tract following proctectomy for mid and low rectal cancer; this by decreasing the morbidity of the coloanal anastomosis on the one hand and by avoiding ileostomy on the other hand.","PeriodicalId":493673,"journal":{"name":"Medicine, case reports and study protocols","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine, case reports and study protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/md9.0000000000000286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICA) remains the standard technique for restoring the digestive tract after proctectomy for low rectal cancer. Often, it requires a temporary diversion stoma, thus increasing the risk of complications. Recent data have shown a great potential of the delayed coloanal anastomosis both in decreasing anastomosis morbidity and in avoiding ileostomy to the patients. More recently, a modified delayed coloanal anastomosis (mDCA) has been described and seems to have promising results. This study aims to determine whether mDCA is non-inferior to ICA. Methods: The IMODE trial is a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial designed to enroll 70 adults with mid or low rectal cancer. Participants are randomized to ICA or mDCA. The primary endpoint is the anastomotic fistulas rate at 6 months. Conclusions: The mDCA can constitute an interesting modality to restore the digestive tract following proctectomy for mid and low rectal cancer; this by decreasing the morbidity of the coloanal anastomosis on the one hand and by avoiding ileostomy on the other hand.
全肠系膜切除后立即与改良延迟结肠肛管吻合术:一项随机对照试验方案
背景:直接结肠肛管吻合术(ICA)仍然是低位直肠癌直肠切除术后恢复消化道的标准技术。通常,它需要临时转移造口,从而增加并发症的风险。近年来的资料显示,延迟结肠肛管吻合术在降低吻合发病率和避免患者回肠造口方面具有很大的潜力。最近,一种改良的延迟结肠肛管吻合术(mDCA)已被描述,似乎有希望的结果。本研究旨在确定mDCA是否优于ICA。方法:IMODE试验是一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验,设计入组70例成人中低位直肠癌患者。参与者随机分为ICA组和mDCA组。主要终点是6个月时吻合口瘘发生率。结论:mDCA是中低位直肠癌直肠切除术后消化道修复的一种有效方式;一方面减少了结肠肛管吻合术的发病率,另一方面避免了回肠造口术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信