Surrealism Was a Muse to Me

Penny Slinger
{"title":"Surrealism Was a Muse to Me","authors":"Penny Slinger","doi":"10.1353/ijs.2023.a908037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surrealism Was a Muse to Me Penny Slinger The surrealist view of woman was primarily as the muse, essential in bringing inspiration to the male surrealist artists. That is why, early in my artistic career, I decided to be my own muse. I did not wish to step down from the role of muse. I was happy to continue to inspire others. But more than that, I wanted to be my own inspiration and see the work I created viewed on par with the work of male artists. I saw nothing in the work I made that rendered it less vital, less original, less creative, less relevant, or less well executed than anything produced by the male of the species. At first, I did not want my work to be identified as being made by a female, so I would sign my work just “Slinger.” As I perceived the boys to be my competition as a student, I wanted my work to be compared to theirs rather than to that of the other female students. As time went on I found my voice as an artist to be truly married to the fact that I was a woman. Dealing with issues that affected me as a woman artist and as a woman in society in general was important for my work. Therefore I began to claim my right to a prominent position in the art world in relation to my rights as a woman. I felt that my sex was not a detriment but an asset, as I could traverse virgin territory and establish something new [End Page 83] rather than travel the well-beaten path. I have always seen myself as an innovator, and being a woman artist of stature as being an innovation in itself. Surrealism is very much a movement and a way of thinking that unites the conscious and the unconscious realms. Put another way, you could say it unites the male and female aspects of the self. As such, the boxes that separate the genders should ideally be smashed by the surrealist ethic and the full androgyny of self be allowed free reign. Anyone who is unable to grasp that concept as central to the surrealist sensibility has no right to call themselves a surrealist. Surrealism is about probing the inner worlds— the sur (above and beyond) realism. In the realm of the psyche the archetypes play. They are not limited to male or female identities. They are all of it, and animal, bird, and other creatures too. Max Ernst certainly portrayed that in his creation of the bird Loplop as his alter ego. So, where the surrealists in the heyday of their movement may have missed the point a little as to the real inclusivity and dissolving of barriers—between worlds and between sexes—that the surrealist perspective represents, we can continue the incentive beyond its historical inception. We can see Surrealism as a timeless approach to art and life, which can guide us to keep opening new vistas in our psyches, add new colors to our palettes, new depths to our investigations. When I found such a mine of inspiration in the collage books of Max Ernst, it inspired me, not to create more of the same but to use the tools of Surrealism to probe my own inner worlds and to express them from a woman’s perspective. In this way, Surrealism was in fact a muse to me and prompted me to become my own muse. May it do so for the many women it touches, and may come to touch, in its wake and in its swell. The art of London-born, LA-based artist p e nn y slinger (b. 1947) spans photography, collage, film, and sculpture. Slinger graduated from the Chelsea School of Art in London in 1969, having [End Page 84] developed a visual language she described as “feminist Surrealism.” Influenced by her study of European Surrealism, especially Max Ernst, and her friendship with Roland Penrose, she explores the feminine psyche in her work, often using her own body to examine the relationship between sexuality, mysticism, and femininity. Her art has been shown in numerous group exhibitions...","PeriodicalId":482593,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surrealism","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surrealism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ijs.2023.a908037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surrealism Was a Muse to Me Penny Slinger The surrealist view of woman was primarily as the muse, essential in bringing inspiration to the male surrealist artists. That is why, early in my artistic career, I decided to be my own muse. I did not wish to step down from the role of muse. I was happy to continue to inspire others. But more than that, I wanted to be my own inspiration and see the work I created viewed on par with the work of male artists. I saw nothing in the work I made that rendered it less vital, less original, less creative, less relevant, or less well executed than anything produced by the male of the species. At first, I did not want my work to be identified as being made by a female, so I would sign my work just “Slinger.” As I perceived the boys to be my competition as a student, I wanted my work to be compared to theirs rather than to that of the other female students. As time went on I found my voice as an artist to be truly married to the fact that I was a woman. Dealing with issues that affected me as a woman artist and as a woman in society in general was important for my work. Therefore I began to claim my right to a prominent position in the art world in relation to my rights as a woman. I felt that my sex was not a detriment but an asset, as I could traverse virgin territory and establish something new [End Page 83] rather than travel the well-beaten path. I have always seen myself as an innovator, and being a woman artist of stature as being an innovation in itself. Surrealism is very much a movement and a way of thinking that unites the conscious and the unconscious realms. Put another way, you could say it unites the male and female aspects of the self. As such, the boxes that separate the genders should ideally be smashed by the surrealist ethic and the full androgyny of self be allowed free reign. Anyone who is unable to grasp that concept as central to the surrealist sensibility has no right to call themselves a surrealist. Surrealism is about probing the inner worlds— the sur (above and beyond) realism. In the realm of the psyche the archetypes play. They are not limited to male or female identities. They are all of it, and animal, bird, and other creatures too. Max Ernst certainly portrayed that in his creation of the bird Loplop as his alter ego. So, where the surrealists in the heyday of their movement may have missed the point a little as to the real inclusivity and dissolving of barriers—between worlds and between sexes—that the surrealist perspective represents, we can continue the incentive beyond its historical inception. We can see Surrealism as a timeless approach to art and life, which can guide us to keep opening new vistas in our psyches, add new colors to our palettes, new depths to our investigations. When I found such a mine of inspiration in the collage books of Max Ernst, it inspired me, not to create more of the same but to use the tools of Surrealism to probe my own inner worlds and to express them from a woman’s perspective. In this way, Surrealism was in fact a muse to me and prompted me to become my own muse. May it do so for the many women it touches, and may come to touch, in its wake and in its swell. The art of London-born, LA-based artist p e nn y slinger (b. 1947) spans photography, collage, film, and sculpture. Slinger graduated from the Chelsea School of Art in London in 1969, having [End Page 84] developed a visual language she described as “feminist Surrealism.” Influenced by her study of European Surrealism, especially Max Ernst, and her friendship with Roland Penrose, she explores the feminine psyche in her work, often using her own body to examine the relationship between sexuality, mysticism, and femininity. Her art has been shown in numerous group exhibitions...
超现实主义是我的缪斯
超现实主义对女性的看法主要是作为缪斯,为男性超现实主义艺术家带来灵感。这就是为什么在我艺术生涯的早期,我决定做自己的缪斯。我不希望从缪斯的角色上退下来。我很高兴能继续激励别人。但更重要的是,我想成为我自己的灵感来源,并看到我创作的作品与男性艺术家的作品相提并论。在我所做的工作中,我看不出有任何地方比同类男性的作品更缺乏活力、更缺乏原创性、更缺乏创造性、更缺乏相关性或更缺乏执行力。一开始,我不希望我的作品被认为是由女性创作的,所以我只会在我的作品上签名“Slinger”。因为我认为男生是我的竞争对手,所以我希望我的作业能和他们比较,而不是和其他女同学比较。随着时间的推移,我发现我作为一个艺术家的声音与我是一个女人的事实真正地结合在一起。作为一名女性艺术家和社会上的女性,处理影响我的问题对我的工作很重要。因此,我开始主张自己在艺术界占有突出地位的权利,这与我作为女性的权利有关。我觉得我的性别不是一种损害,而是一种资产,因为我可以穿越处女地,建立新的东西,而不是走老路。我一直认为自己是一个创新者,作为一个有地位的女艺术家本身就是一种创新。超现实主义在很大程度上是一种运动和一种思维方式,它将意识和无意识领域结合在一起。换句话说,你可以说它统一了自我的男性和女性方面。因此,理想情况下,分隔性别的盒子应该被超现实主义伦理所打破,自我的完全雌雄同体应该被允许自由支配。任何不能把这个概念理解为超现实主义情感核心的人都无权称自己为超现实主义者。超现实主义是关于探索内心世界的——超现实主义。在精神领域,原型在发挥作用。他们并不局限于男性或女性的身份。它们是所有的,还有动物、鸟类和其他生物。马克斯·恩斯特(Max Ernst)在他创作的Loplop鸟中肯定描绘了这一点,这是他的另一个自我。因此,超现实主义者在他们运动的全盛时期可能错过了超现实主义观点所代表的真正的包容性和消除世界之间和性别之间障碍的一点,我们可以继续超越其历史起点的激励。我们可以将超现实主义视为一种永恒的艺术和生活方式,它可以引导我们不断在我们的心灵中开辟新的前景,为我们的调色板增添新的色彩,为我们的研究增添新的深度。当我在马克斯·恩斯特(Max Ernst)的拼贴书中找到这样一座灵感之矿时,它激励了我,不再创造更多相同的东西,而是使用超现实主义的工具来探索我自己的内心世界,并从一个女人的角度来表达它们。这样,超现实主义实际上是我的缪斯,促使我成为自己的缪斯。愿它在它的尾迹和膨胀中,为它所触及的许多女性,以及将来可能触及的许多女性,也能如此。出生于伦敦、现居洛杉矶的艺术家佩恩·伊·斯林格(生于1947年)的艺术跨越了摄影、拼贴、电影和雕塑。斯林格1969年毕业于伦敦切尔西艺术学院,她发展了一种她称之为“女权主义超现实主义”的视觉语言。受她对欧洲超现实主义的研究,尤其是马克斯·恩斯特的影响,以及她与罗兰·彭罗斯的友谊,她在作品中探索了女性的心灵,经常用自己的身体来研究性、神秘主义和女性气质之间的关系。她的作品曾多次在群展中展出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信