The effect of antibiotic selection on collateral effects and evolvability of uropathogenic Escherichia coli

Beth A James, Hishikha Reesaul, Sidra Kashif, Mahoobeh Behruznia, Conor J Meehan, Maria Rosa Domingo Sananes, Alasdair T M Hubbard
{"title":"The effect of antibiotic selection on collateral effects and evolvability of uropathogenic Escherichia coli","authors":"Beth A James, Hishikha Reesaul, Sidra Kashif, Mahoobeh Behruznia, Conor J Meehan, Maria Rosa Domingo Sananes, Alasdair T M Hubbard","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.14.567005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trimethoprim is recommended as a first-line treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in the UK. In 2018, 31.4% of Escherichia coli isolated from UTIs in England were trimethoprim resistant, leading to overreliance on other first and second-line antibiotics. Here, we assessed whether prior selection with trimethoprim results in collateral effects to other antibiotics recommended for the treatment of UTIs. As collateral effects, we considered changes in susceptibility, mutation-selection window and population establishment probability. We selected 10 trimethoprim-resistant derivatives from three clinical isolates of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. We found that mutations conferring trimethoprim resistance did not have any collateral effects to fosfomycin. In contrast, resistance to trimethoprim resulted in decreased susceptibility (collateral resistance) to nitrofurantoin, below the clinical breakpoint, and narrowed the mutation-selection window thereby reducing the maximum concentration for selection of nitrofurantoin resistance mutations. Our analyses demonstrate that multiple collateral responses should be accounted for when predicting and optimising antibiotic use, limiting future AMR emergence.","PeriodicalId":486943,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","volume":"45 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.14.567005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trimethoprim is recommended as a first-line treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in the UK. In 2018, 31.4% of Escherichia coli isolated from UTIs in England were trimethoprim resistant, leading to overreliance on other first and second-line antibiotics. Here, we assessed whether prior selection with trimethoprim results in collateral effects to other antibiotics recommended for the treatment of UTIs. As collateral effects, we considered changes in susceptibility, mutation-selection window and population establishment probability. We selected 10 trimethoprim-resistant derivatives from three clinical isolates of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. We found that mutations conferring trimethoprim resistance did not have any collateral effects to fosfomycin. In contrast, resistance to trimethoprim resulted in decreased susceptibility (collateral resistance) to nitrofurantoin, below the clinical breakpoint, and narrowed the mutation-selection window thereby reducing the maximum concentration for selection of nitrofurantoin resistance mutations. Our analyses demonstrate that multiple collateral responses should be accounted for when predicting and optimising antibiotic use, limiting future AMR emergence.
抗生素选择对尿路致病性大肠杆菌附带效应及可进化性的影响
在英国,甲氧苄啶被推荐作为尿路感染(uti)的一线治疗药物。2018年,英国从尿路感染中分离出的大肠埃希菌中有31.4%对甲氧苄啶耐药,导致过度依赖其他一线和二线抗生素。在这里,我们评估了先前选择甲氧苄氨嘧啶是否会导致推荐用于治疗uti的其他抗生素的附带效应。作为附带效应,我们考虑了易感性、突变选择窗口和种群建立概率的变化。我们从3株尿路致病性大肠杆菌临床分离株中筛选出10株耐甲氧苄啶衍生物。我们发现,赋予甲氧苄氨嘧啶耐药性的突变对磷霉素没有任何附带影响。相比之下,甲氧苄氨嘧啶耐药导致对呋喃妥因的敏感性降低(侧联耐药),低于临床断点,缩小了突变选择窗口,从而降低了呋喃妥因耐药突变选择的最大浓度。我们的分析表明,在预测和优化抗生素使用时,应考虑多种附带反应,以限制未来抗菌素耐药性的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信