An autoethnography of alienation

IF 0.8 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Andrew Voyce
{"title":"An autoethnography of alienation","authors":"Andrew Voyce","doi":"10.1108/mhsi-08-2023-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study is to discuss alienation from a viewpoint of autoethnography. Literature since the 19th century has described the economic determinants of social relations. The proposition is that human beings are strangers in a world they have created. The author revisits this paradigm and aims to show the relevance of alienation in the 20th and 21st centuries. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses the qualitative methodology of autoethnography with data from lived experience. The author relates the author’s personal experience to the meta-narrative of alienation. Findings Autoethnography is an excellent tool for interpretation of the author’s experiences. The author’s work life correlates to models of alienation put forward by Marxist and Critical Theory thought. The author gave the surplus value of the author’s labour to others, and as such, the author’s autoethnography is an authentic statement. The author’s experiences of poor mental health are in the context of pathology residing in alienation. Originality/value Findings reveal that alienation in work and in mental health is a plausible explanation for the way that social situations worked for the author. The author’s experiences support a model of alienation in 20th and 21st century economies. The author shows that the author’s experiences are shared by other vulnerable people.","PeriodicalId":44476,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-08-2023-0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to discuss alienation from a viewpoint of autoethnography. Literature since the 19th century has described the economic determinants of social relations. The proposition is that human beings are strangers in a world they have created. The author revisits this paradigm and aims to show the relevance of alienation in the 20th and 21st centuries. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses the qualitative methodology of autoethnography with data from lived experience. The author relates the author’s personal experience to the meta-narrative of alienation. Findings Autoethnography is an excellent tool for interpretation of the author’s experiences. The author’s work life correlates to models of alienation put forward by Marxist and Critical Theory thought. The author gave the surplus value of the author’s labour to others, and as such, the author’s autoethnography is an authentic statement. The author’s experiences of poor mental health are in the context of pathology residing in alienation. Originality/value Findings reveal that alienation in work and in mental health is a plausible explanation for the way that social situations worked for the author. The author’s experiences support a model of alienation in 20th and 21st century economies. The author shows that the author’s experiences are shared by other vulnerable people.
一本关于异化的自我民族志
本研究的目的是从自我民族志的角度探讨异化。自19世纪以来,文学作品一直在描述社会关系的经济决定因素。其主张是,人类在自己创造的世界中是陌生人。作者重新审视了这一范式,旨在展示异化在20世纪和21世纪的相关性。设计/方法/方法本文采用了自我民族志的定性方法,数据来自生活经验。作者将自己的个人经历与异化元叙事联系起来。自我民族志是解释作者经历的一个很好的工具。作者的工作生活与马克思主义和批判理论思想所提出的异化模式息息相关。作者将自己劳动的剩余价值给予他人,因此,作者的自我民族志是一种真实的陈述。提交人的精神健康状况不佳的经历是在异化的病理学背景下进行的。原创性/价值调查结果显示,工作和心理健康方面的疏离感是对社会状况对作者起作用方式的合理解释。作者的经历支持了20世纪和21世纪经济中的异化模型。作者表明,作者的经历是由其他弱势群体分享的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信