Economic Importance of Different Sealant Materials for Seepage Loss Control of Water Harvesting Pond under Irrigated Condition

{"title":"Economic Importance of Different Sealant Materials for Seepage Loss Control of Water Harvesting Pond under Irrigated Condition","authors":"","doi":"10.7176/jaas/82-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was carried out in order to identify low-cost and efficient sealant materials for water harvesting ponds. An extensive cost comparison study of sealant materials was conducted, taking into account seepage reduction and farm income loss. Four seepage control materials were evaluated in terms of their financial cost. The cost analysis was conducted in terms of farm income loss when three crops' water productivity (kg/m 3 ) were considered potato, onion, and wheat; 1.13, 10.57 and 5.27 kg/m 3 of wheat, potato and onion, respectively. The cost of sealant materials includes the capital cost of material and labor for purchase and application in water harvesting ponds. The cost-benefit analysis result of sealant materials (compaction, mortar, ash, and bentonite) were compared for the next ten years and gave a significant farm income. For this study a water harvesting pond having a volume of 4,792 m 3 was considered to cultivate (wheat, potato, or onion) for one cropping season under irrigated conditions. A farm pond managed by; bentonite and Ash can save 23 % and 43 % than control treatment respectively. The saved irrigation water used to cultivate wheat, potato, and onion crops in 1 ha of land for one cropping season can bring an additional farm income of about 317,632 ETB with Bentonite and 226,798 ETB with Ash when compared to the compaction alone treatment (control). Analysis of cost and income over ten years productivity period showed that, the maximum cost of sealant materials to cover a volume of 4,709.69 m 3 requires at least four years investment period to achieve the breakeven point (189,600 ETB), that corresponds to the point at which the cost of sealant materials equals the resulting farm benefits. Therefore, investing in sealant materials for control seepage lose from water harvesting ponds will give a profit of their investment after four and above project years. Keywords: Cost Effective, Sealant Material, Water harvesting, Water loss DOI: 10.7176/JAAS/82-01 Publication date: July 31 st 2023","PeriodicalId":486051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of African and Asian Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of African and Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/jaas/82-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was carried out in order to identify low-cost and efficient sealant materials for water harvesting ponds. An extensive cost comparison study of sealant materials was conducted, taking into account seepage reduction and farm income loss. Four seepage control materials were evaluated in terms of their financial cost. The cost analysis was conducted in terms of farm income loss when three crops' water productivity (kg/m 3 ) were considered potato, onion, and wheat; 1.13, 10.57 and 5.27 kg/m 3 of wheat, potato and onion, respectively. The cost of sealant materials includes the capital cost of material and labor for purchase and application in water harvesting ponds. The cost-benefit analysis result of sealant materials (compaction, mortar, ash, and bentonite) were compared for the next ten years and gave a significant farm income. For this study a water harvesting pond having a volume of 4,792 m 3 was considered to cultivate (wheat, potato, or onion) for one cropping season under irrigated conditions. A farm pond managed by; bentonite and Ash can save 23 % and 43 % than control treatment respectively. The saved irrigation water used to cultivate wheat, potato, and onion crops in 1 ha of land for one cropping season can bring an additional farm income of about 317,632 ETB with Bentonite and 226,798 ETB with Ash when compared to the compaction alone treatment (control). Analysis of cost and income over ten years productivity period showed that, the maximum cost of sealant materials to cover a volume of 4,709.69 m 3 requires at least four years investment period to achieve the breakeven point (189,600 ETB), that corresponds to the point at which the cost of sealant materials equals the resulting farm benefits. Therefore, investing in sealant materials for control seepage lose from water harvesting ponds will give a profit of their investment after four and above project years. Keywords: Cost Effective, Sealant Material, Water harvesting, Water loss DOI: 10.7176/JAAS/82-01 Publication date: July 31 st 2023
不同密封材料对灌溉条件下集水池渗漏控制的经济意义
本研究旨在为集水塘寻找低成本、高效的密封材料。考虑到减少渗漏和农场收入损失,对密封材料进行了广泛的成本比较研究。对四种防渗材料的财务成本进行了评估。在考虑马铃薯、洋葱和小麦三种作物水分生产力(kg/m 3)的情况下,从农业收入损失角度进行成本分析;小麦、马铃薯和洋葱分别为1.13、10.57和5.27公斤/立方米。密封材料的成本包括购买和在集水池中应用的材料和人工的资本成本。在接下来的十年中,对密封材料(压实、砂浆、灰和膨润土)的成本效益分析结果进行了比较,得出了显著的农场收入。在本研究中,考虑在灌溉条件下种植一个种植季节(小麦、马铃薯或洋葱)的集水塘,其体积为4,792立方米。由…管理的农场池塘;膨润土和灰分比对照处理分别节约23%和43%。与单独压实处理(对照)相比,1公顷土地种植小麦、马铃薯和洋葱作物一个种植季节所节省的灌溉用水,膨润土处理可带来约317,632 ETB的额外农业收入,灰处理可带来约226,798 ETB的额外农业收入。对10年生产期内的成本和收入的分析表明,覆盖4,709.69立方米体积的密封材料的最大成本需要至少四年的投资期才能达到盈亏平衡点(189,600 ETB),这对应于密封材料成本等于由此产生的农场效益的点。因此,投资用于控制集水塘渗漏损失的密封材料将在项目四年及以上后获得投资利润。关键词:成本效益,密封材料,集水,失水DOI: 10.7176/JAAS/82-01出版日期:2023年7月31日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信