America’s Book: The Rise and Decline of a Bible Civilization, 1794–1911 by Mark A. Noll

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
James Hudnut-Beumler
{"title":"<i>America’s Book: The Rise and Decline of a Bible Civilization, 1794–1911</i> by Mark A. Noll","authors":"James Hudnut-Beumler","doi":"10.1162/jinh_r_01992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Noll knows a lot about the history of religion in America and frames the Bible as his protagonist in this engaging, complex, and telling account of how Protestant America became Bible-obsessed in the long nineteenth century. This massive sequel to his formidable In the Beginning Was the Word: The Bible in American Public Life, 1492–1783 (2015) is interdisciplinary insofar as it combines the history of political rhetoric, pro- and anti-slavery arguments before the Civil War, women’s history, history of the book and publishing, African American history, and the impact of biblical criticism.Noll attends to religious movements, innovations, and organizations that embraced biblicism, but also fairly channels individuals like Abraham Lincoln, Frederick Douglass, Maria Stewart, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who often were better interpreters from outside ecclesiastical precincts than the preachers who occupied the then-popular pulpits of the years from the Revolution to World War I.The net effect of Noll’s impressive synthesis of so many kinds of history is highly readable, employing thirty chapters to spotlight significant episodes, and sweeping when it comes to the topic of Protestantism. Since 1970, historians’ treatment of Protestantism in America has shifted from something passé (why study dead white people?) to a newly acknowledged monolithic force that accounts for everything old holding back an emerging diverse contemporary democratic society. Much like whiteness, therefore, Protestantism is now widely invoked but not historicized so much as summarized. Noll’s work corrects this lacuna.If his formal subject is the Bible, Noll’s greater story is how the social custodial Protestants (Congregationalists and Anglicans) lost out to the sectarian Protestants (Methodists and Baptists) who did not initially wish to run society, but only their own churches. The early national era saw most Americans becoming evangelical Bible consumers who believed that all answers could be found in the words of the scripture they fervently quoted. This worked, Noll argues, until slavery revealed that the Bible was used to support every conceivable moral position on the issue. Meanwhile, Catholics and Jews became increasingly vocal about the hegemonic use of the King James Version (kjv) in public schooling. After 1876, Americans produced a plethora of new versions of scripture to support their own religious ideas, evidencing both a diversity of faith and further fragmentation.Noll also tracks how religious consciousness shifted in the scripture passages clergy chose to memorialize American presidents upon their deaths. The shift he finds between the death of President Washington in 1799 and the assassination of President McKinley in 1901 is from biblical Hebraism, invoking the Old Testament, to a decidedly New Testament emphasis. The implication is that American Protestants went from thinking of America as God’s new Israel to comparing assassinated presidents mostly to Jesus in less than a century.By 1911, at the 300th anniversary of the publication of the kjv, the Bible was still popular and widely invoked, but the kjv itself was not nearly so central to political and social life as it had been before the Civil War. Whereas the Jesuit Catholic periodical America saw the kjv as a misattribution of genius belonging solely to the Church—its source—former president Theodore Roosevelt and future president Woodrow Wilson each proclaimed it to be the source of America’s ethics as a Christian nation. William Jennings Bryan staked out the fundamentalist position that the Bible was not to be celebrated as the work of men, but rather received as a divinely inspired book. Thus, the idea of a biblical civilization was eclipsed inside the ranks of some of the faithful and intensified among others, all while the nation’s failure to live up to biblical ideals was painfully obvious to African American observers like Ida B. Wells and Francis Grimke, who keenly saw the shortcomings of Christians like Wilson in living out their biblical ethics. This extraordinarily well-documented study is also to be commended for the interdisciplinary viewpoint it takes of the Bible as simultaneously source, object, product, crutch, problem, and still often an inspiration for Americans and their culture.","PeriodicalId":46755,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interdisciplinary History","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interdisciplinary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jinh_r_01992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Noll knows a lot about the history of religion in America and frames the Bible as his protagonist in this engaging, complex, and telling account of how Protestant America became Bible-obsessed in the long nineteenth century. This massive sequel to his formidable In the Beginning Was the Word: The Bible in American Public Life, 1492–1783 (2015) is interdisciplinary insofar as it combines the history of political rhetoric, pro- and anti-slavery arguments before the Civil War, women’s history, history of the book and publishing, African American history, and the impact of biblical criticism.Noll attends to religious movements, innovations, and organizations that embraced biblicism, but also fairly channels individuals like Abraham Lincoln, Frederick Douglass, Maria Stewart, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who often were better interpreters from outside ecclesiastical precincts than the preachers who occupied the then-popular pulpits of the years from the Revolution to World War I.The net effect of Noll’s impressive synthesis of so many kinds of history is highly readable, employing thirty chapters to spotlight significant episodes, and sweeping when it comes to the topic of Protestantism. Since 1970, historians’ treatment of Protestantism in America has shifted from something passé (why study dead white people?) to a newly acknowledged monolithic force that accounts for everything old holding back an emerging diverse contemporary democratic society. Much like whiteness, therefore, Protestantism is now widely invoked but not historicized so much as summarized. Noll’s work corrects this lacuna.If his formal subject is the Bible, Noll’s greater story is how the social custodial Protestants (Congregationalists and Anglicans) lost out to the sectarian Protestants (Methodists and Baptists) who did not initially wish to run society, but only their own churches. The early national era saw most Americans becoming evangelical Bible consumers who believed that all answers could be found in the words of the scripture they fervently quoted. This worked, Noll argues, until slavery revealed that the Bible was used to support every conceivable moral position on the issue. Meanwhile, Catholics and Jews became increasingly vocal about the hegemonic use of the King James Version (kjv) in public schooling. After 1876, Americans produced a plethora of new versions of scripture to support their own religious ideas, evidencing both a diversity of faith and further fragmentation.Noll also tracks how religious consciousness shifted in the scripture passages clergy chose to memorialize American presidents upon their deaths. The shift he finds between the death of President Washington in 1799 and the assassination of President McKinley in 1901 is from biblical Hebraism, invoking the Old Testament, to a decidedly New Testament emphasis. The implication is that American Protestants went from thinking of America as God’s new Israel to comparing assassinated presidents mostly to Jesus in less than a century.By 1911, at the 300th anniversary of the publication of the kjv, the Bible was still popular and widely invoked, but the kjv itself was not nearly so central to political and social life as it had been before the Civil War. Whereas the Jesuit Catholic periodical America saw the kjv as a misattribution of genius belonging solely to the Church—its source—former president Theodore Roosevelt and future president Woodrow Wilson each proclaimed it to be the source of America’s ethics as a Christian nation. William Jennings Bryan staked out the fundamentalist position that the Bible was not to be celebrated as the work of men, but rather received as a divinely inspired book. Thus, the idea of a biblical civilization was eclipsed inside the ranks of some of the faithful and intensified among others, all while the nation’s failure to live up to biblical ideals was painfully obvious to African American observers like Ida B. Wells and Francis Grimke, who keenly saw the shortcomings of Christians like Wilson in living out their biblical ethics. This extraordinarily well-documented study is also to be commended for the interdisciplinary viewpoint it takes of the Bible as simultaneously source, object, product, crutch, problem, and still often an inspiration for Americans and their culture.
美国书:《圣经文明的兴衰,1794-1911》作者:马克·a·诺尔
诺尔对美国的宗教史了解甚多,他以《圣经》为主角,引人入胜、复杂而生动地描述了新教美国在漫长的19世纪是如何变得痴迷于《圣经》的。这是他令人敬畏的《一开始就是话语:1492-1783年美国公共生活中的圣经》(2015)的续集,它是跨学科的,因为它结合了政治修辞的历史,内战前支持和反对奴隶制的争论,妇女的历史,书籍和出版的历史,非裔美国人的历史,以及圣经批评的影响。诺尔关注宗教运动、创新和信奉圣经的组织,但也相当地引导像亚伯拉罕·林肯、弗雷德里克·道格拉斯、玛丽亚·斯图尔特和伊丽莎白·卡迪·斯坦顿这样的人,他们通常是来自教会以外的更好的解释者,而不是从革命到第一次世界大战期间占据当时流行讲坛的传教士。诺尔对如此多的历史进行了令人印象深刻的综合,其结果是极具可读性。用了三十章来突出重要的事件,当涉及到新教的话题时,它是全面的。自1970年以来,历史学家对美国新教的看法已经从一种微不足道的东西(为什么要研究死去的白人?)转变为一种新被承认的单一力量,它解释了阻碍新兴的多元化当代民主社会的一切旧事物。因此,就像白人一样,新教现在被广泛引用,但没有被历史化,而是被总结了出来。诺尔的工作弥补了这一缺陷。如果他的正式主题是《圣经》,诺尔更伟大的故事是社会监护的新教徒(公理会派和英国国教派)如何输给宗教性的新教徒(卫理公会派和浸信会派),后者最初并不希望管理社会,而只想管理自己的教会。建国初期,大多数美国人成为福音派圣经消费者,他们相信所有的答案都可以在他们热切引用的圣经中找到。诺尔认为,这是有效的,直到奴隶制揭示出圣经被用来支持在这个问题上的每一个可以想象的道德立场。与此同时,天主教徒和犹太人越来越强烈地反对在公立学校中霸权地使用钦定本(kjv)。1876年后,美国人出版了大量新版本的圣经来支持他们自己的宗教思想,这既证明了信仰的多样性,也证明了信仰的进一步分裂。诺尔还追踪了神职人员在纪念美国总统去世时选择的经文中宗教意识的转变。他发现,在1799年华盛顿总统去世和1901年麦金利总统遇刺之间的转变,是从引用旧约的圣经希伯来语,到明确强调新约。言下之意是,在不到一个世纪的时间里,美国新教徒从把美国视为上帝的新以色列,转变为把遇刺的总统大多比作耶稣。到1911年,在英皇钦定本出版300周年之际,《圣经》仍然很受欢迎,被广泛引用,但英皇钦定本本身在政治和社会生活中已经不像内战前那么重要了。虽然耶稣会天主教期刊《美国》认为钦定本是错误地将天才只归于教会——钦定本的源头——,但前总统西奥多·罗斯福和未来的总统伍德罗·威尔逊都宣称钦定本是美国作为一个基督教国家的道德规范的源头。威廉·詹宁斯·布莱恩(William Jennings Bryan)提出了原教旨主义的立场,认为《圣经》不应被视为人类的作品,而应被视为神所启示的书。因此,圣经文明的观念在一些信徒中黯然失色,而在另一些信徒中却得到了强化,与此同时,美国未能实现圣经的理想,这对艾达·b·威尔斯(Ida B. Wells)和弗朗西斯·格里姆克(Francis Grimke)等非裔美国观察家来说是痛苦而明显的,他们敏锐地看到了像威尔逊这样的基督徒在实践圣经伦理方面的缺点。这本文献极其丰富的研究也值得称赞,因为它采用了跨学科的观点,将圣经同时视为来源、对象、产品、支柱、问题,而且仍然经常是美国人及其文化的灵感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interdisciplinary History features substantive articles, research notes, review essays, and book reviews relating historical research and work in applied fields-such as economics and demographics. Spanning all geographical areas and periods of history, topics include: - social history - demographic history - psychohistory - political history - family history - economic history - cultural history - technological history
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信