Instruments to Measure Betel Quid Dependency among Young and Adult Chewers – A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Contemporary Clinical Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ccd.ccd_101_23

Ashwini Deshpande, Ravleen Nagi, Amit Byatnal, Ashok Lingappa, Sujatha Ashok, Pitambra Sahu

{"title":"Instruments to Measure Betel Quid Dependency among Young and Adult Chewers – A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis","authors":"Ashwini Deshpande, Ravleen Nagi, Amit Byatnal, Ashok Lingappa, Sujatha Ashok, Pitambra Sahu","doi":"10.4103/ccd.ccd_101_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Betel quid (BQ) consumption is prevalent globally, majorly consumed in South-Asia and South-East Asian countries. Among the other country studies done on BQ, the focus has been on its consumption prevalence, its physiological and psychological effects, and aids to discontinue this habit. Systematic literature research on suitability of different instruments (metric or scale) to measure BQ dependency is scarce, hence pointing to the need of more evidence-based studies in this domain. Aim: The aim of the article was to identify the instruments used in the published literature to measure BQ dependency among young and adult chewers and draw a comparison. Methodology: The electronic retrieval systems and databases PubMed (Medline), Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched independently by two authors from January 2011 to September 2022 for the collection of desired data. Results: Among 1271 articles, 337 were duplicates and removed, 866 did not meet selection criteria. Out of 68 articles, 57 were excluded due to the lack of relevant data. Finally, only 11 articles were included for the analysis in this systematic review. Conclusion: Due to a scarcity of researches in this direction, no scale can be assigned as the best Dependence Scale, thus necessitating more such systematic reviews and meta-analysis for better comprehension and usage of present dependence scales.","PeriodicalId":10632,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_101_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Betel quid (BQ) consumption is prevalent globally, majorly consumed in South-Asia and South-East Asian countries. Among the other country studies done on BQ, the focus has been on its consumption prevalence, its physiological and psychological effects, and aids to discontinue this habit. Systematic literature research on suitability of different instruments (metric or scale) to measure BQ dependency is scarce, hence pointing to the need of more evidence-based studies in this domain. Aim: The aim of the article was to identify the instruments used in the published literature to measure BQ dependency among young and adult chewers and draw a comparison. Methodology: The electronic retrieval systems and databases PubMed (Medline), Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched independently by two authors from January 2011 to September 2022 for the collection of desired data. Results: Among 1271 articles, 337 were duplicates and removed, 866 did not meet selection criteria. Out of 68 articles, 57 were excluded due to the lack of relevant data. Finally, only 11 articles were included for the analysis in this systematic review. Conclusion: Due to a scarcity of researches in this direction, no scale can be assigned as the best Dependence Scale, thus necessitating more such systematic reviews and meta-analysis for better comprehension and usage of present dependence scales.

查看原文本刊更多论文

测量青少年和成人咀嚼者对槟榔液依赖的仪器-一项系统评价和荟萃分析

背景:槟榔果液(BQ)消费在全球普遍存在，主要在南亚和东南亚国家消费。在对BQ进行的其他国家研究中，重点是其消费流行程度、其生理和心理影响以及如何戒掉这种习惯。关于不同工具(公制或量表)测量BQ依赖性的适用性的系统文献研究很少，因此需要在该领域开展更多基于证据的研究。目的:本文的目的是确定在已发表的文献中使用的工具来测量年轻和成年咀嚼者的BQ依赖性，并进行比较。方法:2011年1月至2022年9月，两位作者独立检索PubMed (Medline)、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Web of Science和Google Scholar等电子检索系统和数据库，收集所需数据。结果:1271篇文献中有重复337篇被剔除，866篇不符合入选标准。68篇文章中，57篇因缺乏相关数据而被排除。最后，只有11篇文章被纳入本系统综述的分析。结论:由于这方面的研究较少，没有一个量表可以作为最佳的依赖量表，因此需要更多的系统评价和meta分析，以便更好地理解和使用现有的依赖量表。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Contemporary Clinical Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

23 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal Contemporary Clinical Dentistry (CCD) (Print ISSN: 0976-237X, E-ISSN:0976- 2361) is peer-reviewed journal published on behalf of Maharishi Markandeshwar University and issues are published quarterly in the last week of March, June, September and December. The Journal publishes Original research papers, clinical studies, case series strictly of clinical interest. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of Dentistry i.e. Conservative dentistry and Endodontics, Dentofacial orthopedics and Orthodontics, Oral medicine and Radiology, Oral pathology, Oral surgery, Orodental diseases, Pediatric Dentistry, Periodontics, Clinical aspects of Public Health dentistry and Prosthodontics. Review articles are not accepted. Review, if published, will only be by invitation from eminent scholars and academicians of National and International repute in the field of Medical/Dental education.