Governing Labor Market Risks

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIOLOGY

Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.14267/cjssp.2023.1.1

Ferry Koster

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design. A vignette study was conducted to investigate hypotheses. In total 914 workers from the Netherlands responded to 4 different vignettes (n = 3656 vignettes). Purpose. Based on compensation hypothesis, this study formulates several hypotheses about the relationship between work insecurity and preferences for protection. By combining a vignette study with a survey among workers it was possible to address the following questions: How do the preferences for protection relate to labor market insecurities and to what extent are the effect of experimental conditions on preferences for risk governance affected by experiences in the actual work situation? Findings. The findings mainly support the hypotheses derived from the compensation and expand them by showing how insecurities in the workplace cross-over to the experimental setting. Originality. While the compensation hypothesis is investigated in prior research, this is the first (semi-)experimental study allowing for arguing that the link between individual risks and preferences for protection are causal.

查看原文本刊更多论文

控制劳动力市场风险

设计。进行了一项小研究来调查假设。总共有914名来自荷兰的员工对4个不同的小插曲(n = 3656个小插曲)做出了回应。目的。在薪酬假设的基础上，本研究提出了工作不安全感与保护偏好之间关系的几个假设。通过将小短文研究与工人调查相结合，可以解决以下问题:保护偏好与劳动力市场不安全感之间的关系，以及实验条件对风险治理偏好的影响在多大程度上受到实际工作情况中的经验的影响?发现。研究结果主要支持从薪酬中得出的假设，并通过展示工作场所的不安全感如何跨界到实验环境来扩展这些假设。创意。虽然补偿假说在先前的研究中被调查过，但这是第一个(半)实验性研究，允许争论个人风险和保护偏好之间的联系是因果关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： CJSSP is an edited and peer-reviewed journal, published in yearly volumes of two issues. It publishes original academic articles, research notes, and reviews from sociology, social policy and related fields in English. It invites contributions from the international community of social researchers. The journal covers a widerange of relevant social issues. It is open to new questions, unusual perspectives, explorations and explanations of social and economic behavior, local society, or supranational challenges. Strong preference is given to problem-oriented, theoretically grounded empirical researches, comparative findings, logical arguments and careful methodological solutions. CJSSP aims to respect publication ethics, thus has adopted current best practices to counter plagiarism. The submitted articles are analyzed during the review process, and papers subject to plagiarism are rejected. Also the authors are to comply with the referencing guidelines outlined in the relevant section. The journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. With similar objectives we do not charge authors for the publication of their articles. Articles submission and processing is free of charge as well. Users can use and build upon the material published in the journal for non-commercial purposes.