The Prevalence of Developmental Disabilities among Children Who Received Home Cares in the Neonatal Period Despite Being High-Risk

Razieh Samsami, Reza Khadivi
{"title":"The Prevalence of Developmental Disabilities among Children Who Received Home Cares in the Neonatal Period Despite Being High-Risk","authors":"Razieh Samsami, Reza Khadivi","doi":"10.34172/ehsj.2023.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims: High-risk neonates (HRNs) included neonates who were born with a weight of less than 1500 g at birth and/or gestational age between 24 and 37 weeks and needed longer intensive medical care. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of developmental disabilities among 5-year-old children that were HRNs in the neonatal period. Methods: In a historical cohort study, 120 five-year-old children were included and divided into two groups of 60 eligible children in the exposed and control groups. They were born as HRNs in 2016 and admitted to the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). After stabilization of their general condition, the infants in the exposed group were discharged and received home care (HC) services, but the control group received long-time care in NICU and did not receive HC services. They were evaluated in terms of developmental domains including vision, hearing, fine motor skills, gross motor skills, communication, problem-solving, and personal and social affairs. The developmental screening was done using the Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ). Results: A total of 61 (50.83%) children were classified as suspected cases of developmental disabilities. There was no significant difference between the exposed and control children in the total frequency of developmental disability (P=0.1). A significant difference was seen only in the problem-solving domain between the exposed and control groups (P=0.043). Conclusion: There were no significant statistical differences in most dimensions of developmental disabilities (except for the problem-solving domain) between the exposed and control children.","PeriodicalId":470613,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Health System Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Health System Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ehsj.2023.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: High-risk neonates (HRNs) included neonates who were born with a weight of less than 1500 g at birth and/or gestational age between 24 and 37 weeks and needed longer intensive medical care. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of developmental disabilities among 5-year-old children that were HRNs in the neonatal period. Methods: In a historical cohort study, 120 five-year-old children were included and divided into two groups of 60 eligible children in the exposed and control groups. They were born as HRNs in 2016 and admitted to the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). After stabilization of their general condition, the infants in the exposed group were discharged and received home care (HC) services, but the control group received long-time care in NICU and did not receive HC services. They were evaluated in terms of developmental domains including vision, hearing, fine motor skills, gross motor skills, communication, problem-solving, and personal and social affairs. The developmental screening was done using the Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ). Results: A total of 61 (50.83%) children were classified as suspected cases of developmental disabilities. There was no significant difference between the exposed and control children in the total frequency of developmental disability (P=0.1). A significant difference was seen only in the problem-solving domain between the exposed and control groups (P=0.043). Conclusion: There were no significant statistical differences in most dimensions of developmental disabilities (except for the problem-solving domain) between the exposed and control children.
在新生儿期接受家庭护理的儿童中,尽管存在高风险,但发育障碍的发生率
背景和目的:高危新生儿(hrn)包括出生时体重小于1500克和/或胎龄在24至37周之间且需要更长时间重症监护的新生儿。本研究旨在评估新生儿期hrn的5岁儿童发育障碍的患病率。方法:在一项历史队列研究中,纳入120名5岁儿童,并将其分为两组,每组60名符合条件的儿童,分别为暴露组和对照组。他们于2016年作为hrn出生,并入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)。暴露组患儿一般情况稳定后出院,接受家庭护理(HC)服务,对照组患儿在新生儿重症监护病房长期护理,未接受HC服务。他们被评估的发展领域包括视力、听力、精细运动技能、大运动技能、沟通、解决问题以及个人和社会事务。发育筛查采用年龄和阶段问卷(ASQ)。结果:61例(50.83%)患儿被诊断为发育障碍疑似病例。暴露组与对照组儿童发育障碍总发生频率差异无统计学意义(P=0.1)。暴露组和对照组之间仅在问题解决领域有显著差异(P=0.043)。结论:除问题解决领域外,接触组与对照组在发育障碍的大部分维度上均无显著性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信