Authorial notes to the text: an artistic device or an ego-document?

L. A. Sapchenko
{"title":"Authorial notes to the text: an artistic device or an ego-document?","authors":"L. A. Sapchenko","doi":"10.26907/2782-4756-2023-73-3-169-174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the authorial notes to the “Letters of a Russian Traveler” by N. Karamzin, who separated “poetry” from “truth”, the article considers the following questions: how to determine the aesthetic nature of the notes; how they are connected with the change of literary trends, genres and styles, with the communicative function of verbal art, how the artistry of notes is formed; whether they are an integral part of the work; whether the author of the notes and the author of the main text are identical. We emphasize that Karamzin’s notes should be analyzed, first of all, in terms of his attitude to the problem of “literature and reality”, since for him authenticity was more important than artistry. The writer enters not into an artistically mediated, but into a direct dialogue with the reader, in order to gain his understanding and trust, to convince him of the veracity of what is described, while revealing a new level of understanding of what happened earlier. The article investigates the dynamics of the relationship between the notes and the main text. The special arrangement of the notes, the temporal and spatial distance separating them from the main text is interpreted as the evidence of their heterogeneity. We note the differences in their status: the main text, in principle, can exist and be perceived by the reader without the notes, albeit in a flawed form, while the publication of the notes in isolation from the main text is meaningless. The article highlights that it is in the literature of sentimentalism and, in particular, in Karamzin’s works, that a specific artistic quality of notes is developed in the form of a dialogue with an imaginary reader. The conclusion is made about the referential function of the authorial notes: in the “Letters of a Russian Traveler” they link literature and reality, the world of images and the real world, which is characterized by “its selective affinity” with the world of fiction.","PeriodicalId":474357,"journal":{"name":"Philology and Culture","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-73-3-169-174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the authorial notes to the “Letters of a Russian Traveler” by N. Karamzin, who separated “poetry” from “truth”, the article considers the following questions: how to determine the aesthetic nature of the notes; how they are connected with the change of literary trends, genres and styles, with the communicative function of verbal art, how the artistry of notes is formed; whether they are an integral part of the work; whether the author of the notes and the author of the main text are identical. We emphasize that Karamzin’s notes should be analyzed, first of all, in terms of his attitude to the problem of “literature and reality”, since for him authenticity was more important than artistry. The writer enters not into an artistically mediated, but into a direct dialogue with the reader, in order to gain his understanding and trust, to convince him of the veracity of what is described, while revealing a new level of understanding of what happened earlier. The article investigates the dynamics of the relationship between the notes and the main text. The special arrangement of the notes, the temporal and spatial distance separating them from the main text is interpreted as the evidence of their heterogeneity. We note the differences in their status: the main text, in principle, can exist and be perceived by the reader without the notes, albeit in a flawed form, while the publication of the notes in isolation from the main text is meaningless. The article highlights that it is in the literature of sentimentalism and, in particular, in Karamzin’s works, that a specific artistic quality of notes is developed in the form of a dialogue with an imaginary reader. The conclusion is made about the referential function of the authorial notes: in the “Letters of a Russian Traveler” they link literature and reality, the world of images and the real world, which is characterized by “its selective affinity” with the world of fiction.
作者对文本的注释:是艺术手段还是自我证明?
本文以分离“诗”与“真”的卡拉姆津的《俄罗斯旅行者信札》的作者笔记为基础,探讨了以下几个问题:如何确定笔记的审美性质;它们是如何与文学思潮、体裁、风格的变化联系起来的,如何与言语艺术的交际功能联系起来的,音符的艺术性是如何形成的;它们是否是工作的组成部分;注释的作者和正文的作者是否相同。我们强调,卡拉姆津的笔记首先应该从他对“文学与现实”问题的态度来分析,因为对他来说,真实性比艺术性更重要。作者不是通过艺术媒介,而是直接与读者对话,以获得他的理解和信任,使他相信所描述的内容的真实性,同时揭示对先前发生的事情的新层次的理解。本文考察了音符与正文之间的动态关系。音符的特殊排列,它们与主要文本之间的时空距离被解释为它们异质性的证据。我们注意到它们在地位上的差异:正文原则上可以存在,读者在没有注释的情况下也可以理解,尽管形式有缺陷,而将注释与正文分开出版是没有意义的。文章强调,在感伤主义文学中,特别是在卡拉姆津的作品中,音符的特定艺术品质是以与想象中的读者对话的形式发展起来的。作者笔记的指称功能:在《俄罗斯旅行者书信集》中,作者笔记将文学与现实、意象世界与现实世界联系起来,与虚构世界具有“选择性亲和”的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信