{"title":"After Two Years of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Germany: Communication about Unvaccinated Individuals and Possible Social Consequences","authors":"Kerstin Wüstner","doi":"10.14267/cjssp.2023.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the attempt to mitigate the crises, the German government struggled with the question what to do. Since vaccines had become available for all, the focus turned on the group that had not decided for vaccination. This paper investigates communication about unvaccinated people and possible social consequences. To this purpose, selected statements of politicians and medical/scientific representatives are analysed. Some representatives addressed the responsibility for the ongoing pandemic to unvaccinated people. They were pictured as supporters of conspiracy myths, or as individuals that lack cognitive or social competences. In order to persuade them to achieve vaccination, several measures were suggested. In order to enhance persuasion, political communication sometimes seemed to simplify or even neglect scientific knowledge. Finally, it is critically discussed what it could mean for society and its handling of the crisis if the described social representations of unvaccinated people reflected at least to some extent public understanding.","PeriodicalId":42178,"journal":{"name":"Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","volume":"2011 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14267/cjssp.2023.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the attempt to mitigate the crises, the German government struggled with the question what to do. Since vaccines had become available for all, the focus turned on the group that had not decided for vaccination. This paper investigates communication about unvaccinated people and possible social consequences. To this purpose, selected statements of politicians and medical/scientific representatives are analysed. Some representatives addressed the responsibility for the ongoing pandemic to unvaccinated people. They were pictured as supporters of conspiracy myths, or as individuals that lack cognitive or social competences. In order to persuade them to achieve vaccination, several measures were suggested. In order to enhance persuasion, political communication sometimes seemed to simplify or even neglect scientific knowledge. Finally, it is critically discussed what it could mean for society and its handling of the crisis if the described social representations of unvaccinated people reflected at least to some extent public understanding.
期刊介绍:
CJSSP is an edited and peer-reviewed journal, published in yearly volumes of two issues. It publishes original academic articles, research notes, and reviews from sociology, social policy and related fields in English. It invites contributions from the international community of social researchers. The journal covers a widerange of relevant social issues. It is open to new questions, unusual perspectives, explorations and explanations of social and economic behavior, local society, or supranational challenges. Strong preference is given to problem-oriented, theoretically grounded empirical researches, comparative findings, logical arguments and careful methodological solutions. CJSSP aims to respect publication ethics, thus has adopted current best practices to counter plagiarism. The submitted articles are analyzed during the review process, and papers subject to plagiarism are rejected. Also the authors are to comply with the referencing guidelines outlined in the relevant section. The journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. With similar objectives we do not charge authors for the publication of their articles. Articles submission and processing is free of charge as well. Users can use and build upon the material published in the journal for non-commercial purposes.