Literature Review Opini Moderasi Beragama

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Heny Triya Ningsih
{"title":"Literature Review Opini Moderasi Beragama","authors":"Heny Triya Ningsih","doi":"10.37680/jcs.v3i1.2895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract  \nModeration opinions that are massively rolled out by the government, especially the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia, are still interesting to investigate about the deepening of the root facts or causes of the widespread opinion of religious moderation. Looking at the history that can be said to be harmonious between religions even before Indonesia's independence. The purpose of this study is to link the most important cause and synchronize it with the meaning of the word from the cause. Synchronization will also be carried out with public policy theory and civil society involvement in social conflict management. The method used in this study is a literature review research which refers to sources that are considered relevant and from the main sources. The results of the literature review show that there is ambiguity in taking the meaning of radicalism which is considered the main cause of the emergence of moderation opinions, the involvement of civil society by the government to parties who are considered radical or who are considered to carry radical ideas along with experts in their fields, no valid sources are found that explain this. Then joint efforts in handling conflict as part of conflict management must be able to distinguish between violent/radical conflict. These efforts are important to give full rights to the community and minimize new conflicts. \nKeywords: Moderation, Public Policy, Radicalism","PeriodicalId":53977,"journal":{"name":"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37680/jcs.v3i1.2895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract  Moderation opinions that are massively rolled out by the government, especially the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia, are still interesting to investigate about the deepening of the root facts or causes of the widespread opinion of religious moderation. Looking at the history that can be said to be harmonious between religions even before Indonesia's independence. The purpose of this study is to link the most important cause and synchronize it with the meaning of the word from the cause. Synchronization will also be carried out with public policy theory and civil society involvement in social conflict management. The method used in this study is a literature review research which refers to sources that are considered relevant and from the main sources. The results of the literature review show that there is ambiguity in taking the meaning of radicalism which is considered the main cause of the emergence of moderation opinions, the involvement of civil society by the government to parties who are considered radical or who are considered to carry radical ideas along with experts in their fields, no valid sources are found that explain this. Then joint efforts in handling conflict as part of conflict management must be able to distinguish between violent/radical conflict. These efforts are important to give full rights to the community and minimize new conflicts. Keywords: Moderation, Public Policy, Radicalism
对宗教温和观点的文学评论
& # x0D;文摘& # x0D;政府,尤其是印尼共和国宗教部大量推出的中庸意见,仍值得深入探讨宗教中庸意见普遍存在的根本原因。回顾历史,甚至在印尼独立之前,宗教之间可以说是和谐的。本研究的目的是将最重要的原因联系起来,并将其与原因中单词的含义同步。公共政策理论和民间社会参与社会冲突管理也将同步进行。本研究使用的方法是文献回顾研究,指的是相关的来源和主要来源。文献综述的结果表明,激进主义的含义存在歧义,这被认为是温和意见出现的主要原因,政府参与公民社会的政党被认为是激进的,或者被认为是携带激进思想的人以及他们领域的专家,没有找到有效的来源来解释这一点。然后,作为冲突管理的一部分,处理冲突的共同努力必须能够区分暴力冲突/激进冲突。这些努力对于给予社区充分的权利和尽量减少新的冲突是很重要的。关键词:温和,公共政策,激进主义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信