Student Perspectives on E-Learning in a Malaysian Medical College One Year into the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Sylvia Wei Wei Kong, Jade Lene Yong, Sabrina Pei Yee Cheong, Edmund Liang Chai Ong
{"title":"Student Perspectives on E-Learning in a Malaysian Medical College One Year into the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Sylvia Wei Wei Kong, Jade Lene Yong, Sabrina Pei Yee Cheong, Edmund Liang Chai Ong","doi":"10.5195/ijms.2023.1484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, most in-person classes in Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia (NUMed) were replaced with e-learning. Our study aims to explore students’ e-learning experiences and its perceived benefits and challenges during the pandemic. Methods: 285 students recruited via convenience sampling participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants completed a self-administered online questionnaire on sociodemographic factors and experiences with e-learning. Descriptive statistics and Spearman’s correlation tests were used to analyze the data. Results: Most students used laptops (n=275, 96.5%) for e-learning and owned at least two electronic devices (n=245, 86%). Over half our students (n=148, 51.9%) reported no change to theoretical knowledge, while about three-quarters (n=213, 74.7%) perceived practical skills to have worsened. Students preferred paper-based exams (n=170, 59.6%) and objectively formatted online exams (n=193, 67.7%). Since transitioning to e-learning, the majority of students (n=207, 72.6%) reported difficulties studying online and were unsatisfied with their academic performance (n=166, 58.2%). Students preferred e-learning due to the lower risk of contracting COVID-19 (n=256, 89.8%), the convenience of online classes (n=244, 85.6%) and flexible schedules (n=219, 76.8%). However, the lack of patient contact (n=236, 82.8%), lecturer and peer interaction (n=234, 82.1%), and unreliable internet (n=201, 70.5%) made e-learning challenging. Students’ experiences were generally affected by multiple factors encompassing personal, lecturer, and environmental aspects. Conclusion: E-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted students’ practical skills and performance satisfaction. Therefore, the university should look towards addressing e-learning constraints and providing adequate support to improve students’ educational experiences in the ongoing pandemic.","PeriodicalId":73459,"journal":{"name":"International journal of medical students","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of medical students","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2023.1484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, most in-person classes in Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia (NUMed) were replaced with e-learning. Our study aims to explore students’ e-learning experiences and its perceived benefits and challenges during the pandemic. Methods: 285 students recruited via convenience sampling participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants completed a self-administered online questionnaire on sociodemographic factors and experiences with e-learning. Descriptive statistics and Spearman’s correlation tests were used to analyze the data. Results: Most students used laptops (n=275, 96.5%) for e-learning and owned at least two electronic devices (n=245, 86%). Over half our students (n=148, 51.9%) reported no change to theoretical knowledge, while about three-quarters (n=213, 74.7%) perceived practical skills to have worsened. Students preferred paper-based exams (n=170, 59.6%) and objectively formatted online exams (n=193, 67.7%). Since transitioning to e-learning, the majority of students (n=207, 72.6%) reported difficulties studying online and were unsatisfied with their academic performance (n=166, 58.2%). Students preferred e-learning due to the lower risk of contracting COVID-19 (n=256, 89.8%), the convenience of online classes (n=244, 85.6%) and flexible schedules (n=219, 76.8%). However, the lack of patient contact (n=236, 82.8%), lecturer and peer interaction (n=234, 82.1%), and unreliable internet (n=201, 70.5%) made e-learning challenging. Students’ experiences were generally affected by multiple factors encompassing personal, lecturer, and environmental aspects. Conclusion: E-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted students’ practical skills and performance satisfaction. Therefore, the university should look towards addressing e-learning constraints and providing adequate support to improve students’ educational experiences in the ongoing pandemic.
2019冠状病毒病大流行一年后马来西亚医学院学生对电子学习的看法:一项横断面研究
背景:在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,马来西亚纽卡斯尔大学医学院(NUMed)的大多数面对面课程都被电子学习所取代。我们的研究旨在探索大流行期间学生的电子学习体验及其感知的好处和挑战。方法:采用方便抽样法对285名大学生进行横断面研究。参与者完成了一份自我管理的关于社会人口因素和电子学习经验的在线问卷。采用描述性统计和Spearman相关检验对数据进行分析。结果:大多数学生使用笔记本电脑(n=275, 96.5%)进行在线学习,拥有至少两台电子设备(n=245, 86%)。超过一半的学生(n=148, 51.9%)报告理论知识没有变化,而大约四分之三的学生(n=213, 74.7%)认为实践技能恶化了。学生更喜欢纸卷考试(n=170,占59.6%)和客观格式化的网络考试(n=193,占67.7%)。自过渡到电子学习以来,大多数学生(n=207, 72.6%)表示在线学习有困难,对自己的学习成绩不满意(n=166, 58.2%)。由于感染新冠病毒的风险较低(n=256, 89.8%),在线课程方便(n=244, 85.6%)和灵活的时间表(n=219, 76.8%),学生更喜欢在线学习。然而,缺乏患者接触(n=236, 82.8%),讲师和同伴互动(n=234, 82.1%),以及不可靠的互联网(n=201, 70.5%)使电子学习具有挑战性。学生的经历通常受到多种因素的影响,包括个人、讲师和环境方面。结论:新冠肺炎疫情期间的网络学习对学生的实践技能和绩效满意度产生了负面影响。因此,大学应着眼于解决电子学习的制约因素,并提供足够的支持,以改善学生在当前大流行中的教育体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信