SOIL MACROFAUNA ABUNDANCE AND DIVERSITY UNDER TREES WOODLOTS IN EASTERN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Jean-Leon Mirembe Kataka, Richard Onwonga, Nancy Karanja, Solomon Kamau
{"title":"SOIL MACROFAUNA ABUNDANCE AND DIVERSITY UNDER TREES WOODLOTS IN EASTERN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO","authors":"Jean-Leon Mirembe Kataka, Richard Onwonga, Nancy Karanja, Solomon Kamau","doi":"10.56369/tsaes.4548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background</strong>. Soil macrofauna are key components of agricultural processes due to their ability to enhance major soil functions such as nutrient cycling and organic matter decomposition. Yet, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, their compositions and dynamics are threatened by the intensification of agricultural activities on small pieces of land characterised by integration of trees into crops farms. <strong>Objective</strong>. To assess the effect of diverse tree species on soil macrofauna abundance and diversity and selected soil chemical properties. <strong>Methodology</strong>. <em>Eucalyptus saligna</em> and <em>Grevillea robusta</em> woodlots were considered for this study, together with a natural forest, an indigenous tree (<em>Ficus</em> <em>benghalensis</em>) and an agricultural farm (with beans grown on it), and were set up as treatments. A complete randomised design was used whereby each treatment was replicated five times in four different locations. Soil macrofauna were collected using soil monoliths as well as Pitfall and Winkler traps, while composite soil samples were taken from monoliths after macrofauna catching. Soil macrofauna were identified at the order level and soil nutrients analysed in the laboratory following standard procedures. The analysis of variance and correlations were carried out using R programming software. <strong>Results</strong>. Soils under natural forest showed significantly low pH as compared to grevillea, eucalyptus, ficus and beans. Soil C levels were significantly low in beans (33.6 g kg-1), than grevillea (45.0 g kg-1), ficus and eucalyptus (46.2 g kg-1 and 47.7 g kg-1), and natural forest (60.7 g kg-1), whereas N was significantly low in beans (3.7 g kg-1) as compared to ficus and eucalyptus (4.3 g kg-1 and 4.7 g kg-1), and grevillea and natural forest (5.3 g kg-1 and 5.3 g kg-1). Soil Ca was significantly higher under ficus, than beans, grevillea, natural forest and eucalyptus. Same trends were observed for P, K and Mg. Highly significant (p &amp;lt;0.05) macrofauna abundance was observed for Araneae (spiders) under beans with an average of 7.3 individuals, compared to grevillea and eucalyptus (6.0 and 5.1 individuals respectively), and natural forest and ficus (3.3 and 2.8 individuals respectively). Inversely, Coleoptera (beetles) were significantly lower under beans than natural forest, ficus, eucalyptus and grevillea, whereas Haplotaxida (earthworms) and Hymenoptera were both higher under ficus. Soils in natural forest and ficus revealed highly significant richness index (9.8 and 9.5) than grevillea and eucalyptus (9.0 and 8.8) and beans (7.5). The Shannon diversity index together with the evenness index were both significantly (p &amp;lt;0.05) higher under beans and lower under ficus. <strong>Implication</strong>. The diversification of soil macrofauna under specific tree species for this study indicates their importance towards the preservation of soil macrofauna communities whose activities impact on soil chemical and physical properties and contribute to maintaining soil ecological functions. <strong>Conclusion</strong>. Thus, in order to maximize positive interactions between tree species, soil macrofauna and soil properties, hence to sustain soil health and maintain a better soil biodiversity, it is important to take into consideration the integration of appropriate tree species into farming systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":23259,"journal":{"name":"Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.4548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Soil macrofauna are key components of agricultural processes due to their ability to enhance major soil functions such as nutrient cycling and organic matter decomposition. Yet, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, their compositions and dynamics are threatened by the intensification of agricultural activities on small pieces of land characterised by integration of trees into crops farms. Objective. To assess the effect of diverse tree species on soil macrofauna abundance and diversity and selected soil chemical properties. Methodology. Eucalyptus saligna and Grevillea robusta woodlots were considered for this study, together with a natural forest, an indigenous tree (Ficus benghalensis) and an agricultural farm (with beans grown on it), and were set up as treatments. A complete randomised design was used whereby each treatment was replicated five times in four different locations. Soil macrofauna were collected using soil monoliths as well as Pitfall and Winkler traps, while composite soil samples were taken from monoliths after macrofauna catching. Soil macrofauna were identified at the order level and soil nutrients analysed in the laboratory following standard procedures. The analysis of variance and correlations were carried out using R programming software. Results. Soils under natural forest showed significantly low pH as compared to grevillea, eucalyptus, ficus and beans. Soil C levels were significantly low in beans (33.6 g kg-1), than grevillea (45.0 g kg-1), ficus and eucalyptus (46.2 g kg-1 and 47.7 g kg-1), and natural forest (60.7 g kg-1), whereas N was significantly low in beans (3.7 g kg-1) as compared to ficus and eucalyptus (4.3 g kg-1 and 4.7 g kg-1), and grevillea and natural forest (5.3 g kg-1 and 5.3 g kg-1). Soil Ca was significantly higher under ficus, than beans, grevillea, natural forest and eucalyptus. Same trends were observed for P, K and Mg. Highly significant (p &lt;0.05) macrofauna abundance was observed for Araneae (spiders) under beans with an average of 7.3 individuals, compared to grevillea and eucalyptus (6.0 and 5.1 individuals respectively), and natural forest and ficus (3.3 and 2.8 individuals respectively). Inversely, Coleoptera (beetles) were significantly lower under beans than natural forest, ficus, eucalyptus and grevillea, whereas Haplotaxida (earthworms) and Hymenoptera were both higher under ficus. Soils in natural forest and ficus revealed highly significant richness index (9.8 and 9.5) than grevillea and eucalyptus (9.0 and 8.8) and beans (7.5). The Shannon diversity index together with the evenness index were both significantly (p &lt;0.05) higher under beans and lower under ficus. Implication. The diversification of soil macrofauna under specific tree species for this study indicates their importance towards the preservation of soil macrofauna communities whose activities impact on soil chemical and physical properties and contribute to maintaining soil ecological functions. Conclusion. Thus, in order to maximize positive interactions between tree species, soil macrofauna and soil properties, hence to sustain soil health and maintain a better soil biodiversity, it is important to take into consideration the integration of appropriate tree species into farming systems.

刚果民主共和国东部树木林地土壤大型动物的丰度和多样性
& lt; p> & lt; strong> Background< / strong>。土壤大型动物是农业过程的关键组成部分,因为它们能够增强养分循环和有机物分解等主要土壤功能。然而,在刚果民主共和国,它们的组成和动态受到在小块土地上加强农业活动的威胁,其特点是将树木纳入农作物农场。& lt; strong> Objective< / strong>。评价不同树种对土壤大型动物丰度和多样性及土壤化学性质的影响。& lt; strong> Methodology< / strong>。& lt; em>桉树saligna< / em>和<em>Grevillea robusta</em>本研究考虑了林地,以及天然森林,一种本土树木(<em>无花果</em><em>benghalensis</em>)和一个农场(上面种着豆子),并被设置为处理。采用完全随机设计,每种治疗在四个不同地点重复五次。采用单石捕集法和Pitfall捕集法和Winkler捕集法采集土壤大型动物,单石捕集后采集复合土壤样品。土壤大型动物按目进行鉴定,土壤养分按标准程序在实验室进行分析。采用R编程软件进行方差分析和相关性分析。& lt; strong> Results< / strong>。天然林土壤pH值明显低于柳橙、桉树、榕树和豆类。土壤碳含量在豆类(33.6 g kg-1)显著低于柳叶(45.0 g kg-1)、榕树和桉树(46.2 g kg-1和47.7 g kg-1)和天然林(60.7 g kg-1),而氮含量在豆类(3.7 g kg-1)显著低于榕树和桉树(4.3 g kg-1和4.7 g kg-1)、柳叶和天然林(5.3 g kg-1和5.3 g kg-1)。榕树林下土壤钙含量显著高于豆类、藤萝、天然林和桉树。磷、钾和镁的变化趋势相同。蚕豆下蜘蛛科(Araneae)的大型动物丰度极显著(p <0.05),平均7.3个个体,高于绿柳科和桉树科(分别为6.0和5.1个个体),天然林和无花果科(分别为3.3和2.8个个体)。相反,蚕豆下的鞘翅目昆虫数量显著低于天然林、无花果、桉树和绿柳,而单翅目昆虫和膜翅目昆虫数量均高于无花果。天然林和榕树土壤丰富度指数分别为9.8和9.5,显著高于葛柳、桉树(9.0和8.8)和豆类(7.5)。豆下的Shannon多样性指数和均匀度指数均显著高于(p <0.05),而榕下的Shannon多样性指数显著低于(p <0.05)。& lt; strong> Implication< / strong>。本研究中特定树种下土壤大型动物的多样性表明它们对保护土壤大型动物群落的重要性,它们的活动影响着土壤的化学和物理性质,有助于维持土壤的生态功能。& lt; strong> Conclusion< / strong>。因此,为了最大限度地发挥树种、土壤大型动物和土壤特性之间的积极相互作用,从而维持土壤健康并保持更好的土壤生物多样性,重要的是要考虑将适当的树种纳入耕作系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is an international peer-reviewed publication devoted to disseminate original information contributing to the understanding and development of agroecosystems in tropical and subtropical areas. The Journal recognizes the multidisciplinary nature of its scope and encourages the submission of original manuscripts from all of the disciplines involved in this area. Original contributions are welcomed in relation to the study of particular components of the agroecosystems (i.e. plant, animal, soil) as well as the resulting interactions and their relationship/impact on society and environment. The journal does not received manuscripts based solely on economic acpects o food technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信