{"title":"Political Branding and Voters’ Preference: A Conceptual Model","authors":"Danie Ferreira, Marlé van Eyk","doi":"10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2023.1(5)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of branding in politics has changed and political parties are increasingly using branding to distinguish themselves from competitors during elections. Political parties and the offerings of organisations have similar characteristics, as the offerings that the consumer votes for are intangible, perishable, heterogeneous and inseparable from the service provider. Similar to commercial organisations, political parties are interested in understanding why voters are drawn to the specific party and what motivates voters to switch to a competing party. There are thus many similarities between how customers choose between commercial brands, and how voters choose the political party they intend to support (Ahmed et al., 2017). Due to the complex nature of political branding, political parties, as brands, are dynamic and the political party needs to ensure that voters understand what the party entails in terms of their core values, such as social equality (Pich et al., 2019). The integration of branding principles into consumer (voter's) preference has led to political parties being branded differently to be distinguishable. According to Busby and Cronshaw (2015), differentiation can be achieved by moving away from simply providing customers (voters) with image-based differentiation but by promising them a lifestyle-enhancing experience which provides benefits to both the customers and the brand. Parties have therefore realised the importance and relevance of having a strong branding strategy. Darling and Gilbert (2019) note that voters do not see much differentiation between the various parties' mandate. In line with the views of Needham and Smith (2015) who states that there is a growing consensus that parties and politicians can usefully be conceptualized as brands, Ferreira and Van Eyk (2022) recommends that more research is needed on political branding and voters' perceptions. It is important that political parties identify and understand the political brand elements that influence voters' decision making. The aim of the paper is to create a conceptual model of political brand elements that can influence voters' decision making. Keywords: Elections, Branding, Politics, Preference, Voting","PeriodicalId":143319,"journal":{"name":"Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences Proceeding","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences Proceeding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2023.1(5)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of branding in politics has changed and political parties are increasingly using branding to distinguish themselves from competitors during elections. Political parties and the offerings of organisations have similar characteristics, as the offerings that the consumer votes for are intangible, perishable, heterogeneous and inseparable from the service provider. Similar to commercial organisations, political parties are interested in understanding why voters are drawn to the specific party and what motivates voters to switch to a competing party. There are thus many similarities between how customers choose between commercial brands, and how voters choose the political party they intend to support (Ahmed et al., 2017). Due to the complex nature of political branding, political parties, as brands, are dynamic and the political party needs to ensure that voters understand what the party entails in terms of their core values, such as social equality (Pich et al., 2019). The integration of branding principles into consumer (voter's) preference has led to political parties being branded differently to be distinguishable. According to Busby and Cronshaw (2015), differentiation can be achieved by moving away from simply providing customers (voters) with image-based differentiation but by promising them a lifestyle-enhancing experience which provides benefits to both the customers and the brand. Parties have therefore realised the importance and relevance of having a strong branding strategy. Darling and Gilbert (2019) note that voters do not see much differentiation between the various parties' mandate. In line with the views of Needham and Smith (2015) who states that there is a growing consensus that parties and politicians can usefully be conceptualized as brands, Ferreira and Van Eyk (2022) recommends that more research is needed on political branding and voters' perceptions. It is important that political parties identify and understand the political brand elements that influence voters' decision making. The aim of the paper is to create a conceptual model of political brand elements that can influence voters' decision making. Keywords: Elections, Branding, Politics, Preference, Voting
在政治中使用品牌已经发生了变化,政党在选举中越来越多地使用品牌来区分自己与竞争对手。政党和组织的产品具有相似的特征,因为消费者投票支持的产品是无形的,易腐烂的,异构的,与服务提供商不可分割的。与商业组织类似,政党有兴趣了解选民为什么会被吸引到特定的政党,以及是什么促使选民转向竞争政党。因此,消费者如何选择商业品牌与选民如何选择他们打算支持的政党之间存在许多相似之处(Ahmed et al., 2017)。由于政治品牌的复杂性,政党作为品牌是动态的,政党需要确保选民了解该党在社会平等等核心价值观方面的要求(Pich等人,2019)。品牌原则与消费者(选民)偏好的整合导致政党被打上不同的品牌,以区分开来。根据Busby和Cronshaw(2015),差异化可以通过从简单地为客户(选民)提供基于形象的差异化,而是通过向他们承诺一种提高生活方式的体验,从而为客户和品牌带来好处来实现。因此,各方已经意识到拥有一个强大的品牌战略的重要性和相关性。达林和吉尔伯特(2019)指出,选民没有看到不同政党的任务之间有太大区别。Needham和Smith(2015)的观点表明,越来越多的人认为政党和政治家可以被有效地概念化为品牌,Ferreira和Van Eyk(2022)建议需要对政治品牌和选民的看法进行更多的研究。政党识别和理解影响选民决策的政治品牌因素是很重要的。本文的目的是建立一个影响选民决策的政治品牌要素的概念模型。关键词:选举,品牌,政治,偏好,投票