Has innovations in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer improved patients curability?

Q4 Medicine
Nowotwory Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.5603/njo.95700
Bogusław Maciejewski, Dorota Gabryś, Justyna Rembak-Szynkiewicz, Aleksandra Napieralska, Małgorzta Stąpór-Fudzińska
{"title":"Has innovations in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer improved patients curability?","authors":"Bogusław Maciejewski, Dorota Gabryś, Justyna Rembak-Szynkiewicz, Aleksandra Napieralska, Małgorzta Stąpór-Fudzińska","doi":"10.5603/njo.95700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the era of distinct technological innovations in radiotherapy, clinically important question arises has the increase of the RT effectiveness been achieved due to these innovations, at least in case of the head and neck (H&N) cancers. To answer to this question 133 studies published in the literature, including 21 058 patients with H&N cancer treated in the period a 1970-2010 years were selected to the present survey. Three end-points, e.g. 5-year local tumour control (LTC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and its averages have been evaluated in the consecutive decades of time. For cancer in the early stage, both LTC and DFS were constantly high (80–90%) through the analyzed decades. For locally advanced cancer, average rates of the LTC and an DFS were also constant, but much lower (40-45%) than expected. The OS has an increasing tendency from 45–50% in 1980 to more than 70% in 2010. It may suggest that during the 5-year follow-up some rate (~20%) of advanced tumours gradually progressed from local to chronic disease. Various technical and clinical problems influencing the results of the present review are discussed in details. Some uncertainties and doubts regarding the RT trials may suggest that “ evidence based ” recommendations are not a good ambassador enough, and in the era of combined treatment modalities it may seem reasonably to replace it by “ individually personalized combined therapy ” . However, nowadays the only plausible solution to improve H&N curability is to intensify all efforts to detect H&N cancer in a very early stage of disease and to increase various activities to convince people to participate in regular prophylactic examinations.","PeriodicalId":39938,"journal":{"name":"Nowotwory","volume":"5 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nowotwory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/njo.95700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the era of distinct technological innovations in radiotherapy, clinically important question arises has the increase of the RT effectiveness been achieved due to these innovations, at least in case of the head and neck (H&N) cancers. To answer to this question 133 studies published in the literature, including 21 058 patients with H&N cancer treated in the period a 1970-2010 years were selected to the present survey. Three end-points, e.g. 5-year local tumour control (LTC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and its averages have been evaluated in the consecutive decades of time. For cancer in the early stage, both LTC and DFS were constantly high (80–90%) through the analyzed decades. For locally advanced cancer, average rates of the LTC and an DFS were also constant, but much lower (40-45%) than expected. The OS has an increasing tendency from 45–50% in 1980 to more than 70% in 2010. It may suggest that during the 5-year follow-up some rate (~20%) of advanced tumours gradually progressed from local to chronic disease. Various technical and clinical problems influencing the results of the present review are discussed in details. Some uncertainties and doubts regarding the RT trials may suggest that “ evidence based ” recommendations are not a good ambassador enough, and in the era of combined treatment modalities it may seem reasonably to replace it by “ individually personalized combined therapy ” . However, nowadays the only plausible solution to improve H&N curability is to intensify all efforts to detect H&N cancer in a very early stage of disease and to increase various activities to convince people to participate in regular prophylactic examinations.
头颈癌放疗的创新是否提高了患者的治愈率?
在放疗技术不断创新的时代,临床出现了一个重要的问题,即放疗有效性的提高是否由于这些创新而实现,至少在头颈部(H&N)癌症的情况下。为了回答这个问题,本研究选择了133篇发表在文献中的研究,其中包括1970-2010年间接受治疗的21,058例H&N癌患者。三个终点,如5年局部肿瘤控制(LTC),无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)及其平均值在连续几十年的时间进行了评估。对于早期癌症,在分析的几十年中,LTC和DFS一直很高(80-90%)。对于局部晚期癌症,LTC和DFS的平均发生率也保持不变,但远低于预期(40-45%)。OS从1980年的45-50%上升到2010年的70%以上。提示在5年随访期间,部分晚期肿瘤(约20%)逐渐由局部发展为慢性疾病。详细讨论了影响本综述结果的各种技术和临床问题。有关RT试验的一些不确定性和疑虑可能表明,“基于证据”的建议并不是一个好的大使,在联合治疗模式的时代,用“个性化联合治疗”取代它似乎是合理的。然而,目前提高H&N治愈率的唯一可行的解决方案是加强一切努力,在疾病的早期发现H&N癌症,并增加各种活动,说服人们参加定期的预防性检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nowotwory
Nowotwory Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: NOWOTWORY Journal of Oncology publishes papers which cover all aspects of oncology but concentrates on clinical studies, both research orientated and treatment orientated, rather than on laboratory studies. Contributions are also welcomed from the fields of epidemiology, tumor pathology, radiobiology and radiation physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信