Design thinking for innovation in sustainable built environments: a systematic literature review

IF 3.5 Q3 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kallaya Tantiyaswasdikul
{"title":"Design thinking for innovation in sustainable built environments: a systematic literature review","authors":"Kallaya Tantiyaswasdikul","doi":"10.1108/sasbe-01-2023-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This systematic literature review investigates the contribution of design thinking (DT) as a process and tool to drive innovation in a sustainable built environment (SBE) and develops a new model for sustainability research integrating DT and future thinking approaches toward achieving a unified DT and foresight notion for future research and applications. Design/methodology/approach This review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Open-access English articles published between 2000 and 2022 identified using the EBSCOhost, Emerald Insight, DOJA, JSTOR, Scopus and Taylor and Francis database searches were reviewed. The review framework deploys a previously proposed modified Ansoff matrix with an integrated innovation matrix to identify and analyze the challenges and opportunities for innovation growth in SBE. Additionally, a citation analysis was conducted to explore the impact of DT for innovation in SBE, and a proposed framework based on design by drawing on foresight theory was developed. Findings Research on DT for innovation in SBE faces the challenge of unanticipated impacts. According to the average number of citations per document, innovation associated with new solutions within a new context seems to become highly influential. Additionally, research gaps exist in the integration of foresight and DT into sustainability research to identify new contexts and solutions to SBE. A model of foresight design thinking (FDT) is proposed to guide future research and support the practical application of DT in sustainability. Research limitations/implications This analysis was limited by the selection criteria as only certain keywords were used and English-only articles were selected. Future research should consider the use of DT for innovation in SBE using various important keywords, which would improve research findings and expand the contribution of DT to SBE. Practical implications The FDT model offers a new holistic framework for the iterative process of reframing and reperception, focusing on divergent and convergent thinking with the goal of contributing to SBE practices. Social implications The integrated framework of DT and foresight can contribute to the study and development of sustainable innovation and a strategic shift toward a sustainable society. Originality/value The integration of DT, foresight and sustainability can broaden the horizons of sustainability research by systematically addressing future challenges related to SBE, which can be translated into feasible and innovative solutions. Thus, the FDT model complements the application of DT in sustainable innovation in this research field.","PeriodicalId":45779,"journal":{"name":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-01-2023-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This systematic literature review investigates the contribution of design thinking (DT) as a process and tool to drive innovation in a sustainable built environment (SBE) and develops a new model for sustainability research integrating DT and future thinking approaches toward achieving a unified DT and foresight notion for future research and applications. Design/methodology/approach This review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Open-access English articles published between 2000 and 2022 identified using the EBSCOhost, Emerald Insight, DOJA, JSTOR, Scopus and Taylor and Francis database searches were reviewed. The review framework deploys a previously proposed modified Ansoff matrix with an integrated innovation matrix to identify and analyze the challenges and opportunities for innovation growth in SBE. Additionally, a citation analysis was conducted to explore the impact of DT for innovation in SBE, and a proposed framework based on design by drawing on foresight theory was developed. Findings Research on DT for innovation in SBE faces the challenge of unanticipated impacts. According to the average number of citations per document, innovation associated with new solutions within a new context seems to become highly influential. Additionally, research gaps exist in the integration of foresight and DT into sustainability research to identify new contexts and solutions to SBE. A model of foresight design thinking (FDT) is proposed to guide future research and support the practical application of DT in sustainability. Research limitations/implications This analysis was limited by the selection criteria as only certain keywords were used and English-only articles were selected. Future research should consider the use of DT for innovation in SBE using various important keywords, which would improve research findings and expand the contribution of DT to SBE. Practical implications The FDT model offers a new holistic framework for the iterative process of reframing and reperception, focusing on divergent and convergent thinking with the goal of contributing to SBE practices. Social implications The integrated framework of DT and foresight can contribute to the study and development of sustainable innovation and a strategic shift toward a sustainable society. Originality/value The integration of DT, foresight and sustainability can broaden the horizons of sustainability research by systematically addressing future challenges related to SBE, which can be translated into feasible and innovative solutions. Thus, the FDT model complements the application of DT in sustainable innovation in this research field.
可持续建筑环境创新的设计思维:系统的文献综述
本文通过系统的文献综述,探讨了设计思维(DT)作为推动可持续建筑环境(SBE)创新的过程和工具的贡献,并建立了一个将设计思维和未来思维方法相结合的可持续发展研究新模型,以实现统一的设计思维和前瞻性概念,为未来的研究和应用提供参考。设计/方法/方法本综述基于系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明。通过EBSCOhost、Emerald Insight、DOJA、JSTOR、Scopus和Taylor and Francis数据库检索,回顾了2000年至2022年间发表的开放获取英语文章。评估框架采用了先前提出的带有集成创新矩阵的修正Ansoff矩阵,以识别和分析中小企业创新增长的挑战和机遇。此外,本文还通过引文分析探讨了创新创新对中小企业创新的影响,并提出了一个基于前瞻性设计的框架。研究结果:中小企业创新的DT研究面临着不可预期影响的挑战。根据每份文件的平均引用次数,与新环境下的新解决方案相关的创新似乎变得非常有影响力。此外,在将前瞻性和DT整合到可持续性研究中,以确定SBE的新背景和解决方案方面,还存在研究空白。提出了一个前瞻性设计思维模型,以指导未来的研究,并支持前瞻性设计思维在可持续发展中的实际应用。研究局限性/启示本分析受到选择标准的限制,因为只使用了某些关键词,并且只选择了英文文章。未来的研究应考虑利用DT对SBE进行创新,使用各种重要的关键词,从而完善研究成果,扩大DT对SBE的贡献。FDT模型为重构和再感知的迭代过程提供了一个新的整体框架,关注发散和收敛思维,目标是为SBE实践做出贡献。可持续创新与前瞻的整合框架有助于可持续创新的研究和发展,以及向可持续社会的战略转变。创新/价值创新、远见和可持续性的整合可以通过系统地解决与SBE相关的未来挑战,拓宽可持续发展研究的视野,这些挑战可以转化为可行和创新的解决方案。因此,FDT模型补充了本研究领域中DT在可持续创新中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信