{"title":"Improving the Educational Gap with Implementing of Teaching Scholarship in Virtual Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards","authors":"Zohreh Khoshgoftar, Fatemeh Sodeifian, Farzad Allameh","doi":"10.5812/ijcm-137490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cancer management has become increasingly challenging due to the emergence of a personalized approach that requires careful assessment, multidisciplinary efforts, and experienced physicians. Objectives: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic’s effect on executing all medical meetings as well as multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB), we decided to design, perform, and evaluate a teaching scholarship in virtual MTB for urologic cancer patients. Methods: In this prospective study from December 2020 to July 2022, the authors evaluated the designing, implementation, and learning efficacy of a virtual tumor board in the Urology Department of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU). All the faculty members (N = 25) and urology residents (N = 35) were included in this investigation. To make the sessions multidisciplinary, other related departments including pathology, radio-oncology, medical oncology, radiology, and nuclear medicine were also included. Virtual tumor boards were implanted monthly in 20 sessions. Results: A short interview was conducted for the needs assessment. The faculty members' and residents’ statements were divided into high, intermediate, and low importance. After implementation, a satisfaction questionnaire based on the first level of the Kirkpatrick model was recorded and the means were 76% and 71% in faculty members and residents respectively for virtual execution. The results of evaluating the intervention according to the second level of the Kirkpatrick model and through the tests before and after tumor boards were recorded and the mean differences evaluated by paired t test were statistically significant. In the last step for external evaluation, the satisfaction rate of 5 arbitrators was 75% for executing a proper virtual MTB. Conclusions: A virtual board is an effective learning method for the medical education of urology residents. It could help the practitioner to coordinate and discuss with different specialties and lead to the best decision for urologic cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":44764,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijcm-137490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cancer management has become increasingly challenging due to the emergence of a personalized approach that requires careful assessment, multidisciplinary efforts, and experienced physicians. Objectives: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic’s effect on executing all medical meetings as well as multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB), we decided to design, perform, and evaluate a teaching scholarship in virtual MTB for urologic cancer patients. Methods: In this prospective study from December 2020 to July 2022, the authors evaluated the designing, implementation, and learning efficacy of a virtual tumor board in the Urology Department of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU). All the faculty members (N = 25) and urology residents (N = 35) were included in this investigation. To make the sessions multidisciplinary, other related departments including pathology, radio-oncology, medical oncology, radiology, and nuclear medicine were also included. Virtual tumor boards were implanted monthly in 20 sessions. Results: A short interview was conducted for the needs assessment. The faculty members' and residents’ statements were divided into high, intermediate, and low importance. After implementation, a satisfaction questionnaire based on the first level of the Kirkpatrick model was recorded and the means were 76% and 71% in faculty members and residents respectively for virtual execution. The results of evaluating the intervention according to the second level of the Kirkpatrick model and through the tests before and after tumor boards were recorded and the mean differences evaluated by paired t test were statistically significant. In the last step for external evaluation, the satisfaction rate of 5 arbitrators was 75% for executing a proper virtual MTB. Conclusions: A virtual board is an effective learning method for the medical education of urology residents. It could help the practitioner to coordinate and discuss with different specialties and lead to the best decision for urologic cancer patients.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Cancer Management (IJCM) publishes peer-reviewed original studies and reviews on cancer etiology, epidemiology and risk factors, novel approach to cancer management including prevention, diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and issues regarding cancer survivorship and palliative care. The scope spans the spectrum of cancer research from the laboratory to the clinic, with special emphasis on translational cancer research that bridge the laboratory and clinic. We also consider original case reports that expand clinical cancer knowledge and convey important best practice messages.