Selection and Use of Antioxidants-radioprotectors in the Composition of Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals (Review)

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
E. P. Pavlenko, A. A. Larenkov, Iu. A. Mitrofanov
{"title":"Selection and Use of Antioxidants-radioprotectors in the Composition of Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals (Review)","authors":"E. P. Pavlenko, A. A. Larenkov, Iu. A. Mitrofanov","doi":"10.33380/2305-2066-2023-12-4-1525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The use of radiopharmaceuticals for targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT), the efficacy of which was established during clinical trials, is safe and effective for various pathological conditions, including cancer. The main feature of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals (RPs) is the use of β – - and α-emitting radionuclides (RNs) in the finished dosage form (FD). Among the radionuclides used for radionuclide therapy, lutetium-177 is currently one of the most popular in clinical practice because of its chemical and nuclear characteristics. The list of RPs based on lutetium-177 is constantly expanding, and Lutathera® ([ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE) and Pluvicto™ ([ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617) have been approved for clinical use in several countries. Text. Because of the high activity of RNs in a single dose of therapeutic RPs (up to 8 GBq in a monodose for 177 Lu), ionizing radiation of the used RNs leads to a decrease in RPs quality owing to radiolytic degradation of the vector molecule. This leads to a decreased specific accumulation of radioactivity in the foci of pathology, reduced therapeutic effect, and potentially increases the risk of radiotoxicity to non-target organs and tissues. The degree and intensity of radiolytic degradation of the vector molecule and, consequently, the shelf life of RPs depend on many factors, among which the activity concentration of the radionuclide in the preparation, its half-life, and the energy of the emitted particles are the most important. To suppress the effects of radiolysis, various excipients with antioxidant (radioprotective) properties were introduced into the compositions of the finished dosage forms. Among the substances studied, the most popular were gentisic acid, ascorbic acid, and ethanol. In this work, the advantages and disadvantages of various antioxidants and their combinations used in therapeutic RPs were considered in lutetium-177 preparations. Conclusion. Selection of the optimal composition of the dosage form is an urgent task, as it will ensure high-quality RPs both at the time of preparation and during the shelf life and delivery to the end user, which will greatly facilitate the use and centralized supply of therapeutic RPs. The necessity of creating a unified approach for the selection of antioxidants at the pharmaceutical development stage of radiopharmaceuticals is shown. For this purpose, an approach combining studies of radical reaction kinetics with studies of radiation-chemical yields of radiolysis products under identical or maximally similar conditions with subsequent verification of the stability of RPs dosage form seems to be very promising and has proven to be effective. In contrast, the empirical approach, which implies the selection of radioprotectors based on a direct study of their influence on the preservation of the level of radiochemical purity, is suboptimal because of the high market value of both radionuclides and non-radioactive precursors.","PeriodicalId":36465,"journal":{"name":"Drug Development and Registration","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Development and Registration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33380/2305-2066-2023-12-4-1525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The use of radiopharmaceuticals for targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT), the efficacy of which was established during clinical trials, is safe and effective for various pathological conditions, including cancer. The main feature of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals (RPs) is the use of β – - and α-emitting radionuclides (RNs) in the finished dosage form (FD). Among the radionuclides used for radionuclide therapy, lutetium-177 is currently one of the most popular in clinical practice because of its chemical and nuclear characteristics. The list of RPs based on lutetium-177 is constantly expanding, and Lutathera® ([ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE) and Pluvicto™ ([ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617) have been approved for clinical use in several countries. Text. Because of the high activity of RNs in a single dose of therapeutic RPs (up to 8 GBq in a monodose for 177 Lu), ionizing radiation of the used RNs leads to a decrease in RPs quality owing to radiolytic degradation of the vector molecule. This leads to a decreased specific accumulation of radioactivity in the foci of pathology, reduced therapeutic effect, and potentially increases the risk of radiotoxicity to non-target organs and tissues. The degree and intensity of radiolytic degradation of the vector molecule and, consequently, the shelf life of RPs depend on many factors, among which the activity concentration of the radionuclide in the preparation, its half-life, and the energy of the emitted particles are the most important. To suppress the effects of radiolysis, various excipients with antioxidant (radioprotective) properties were introduced into the compositions of the finished dosage forms. Among the substances studied, the most popular were gentisic acid, ascorbic acid, and ethanol. In this work, the advantages and disadvantages of various antioxidants and their combinations used in therapeutic RPs were considered in lutetium-177 preparations. Conclusion. Selection of the optimal composition of the dosage form is an urgent task, as it will ensure high-quality RPs both at the time of preparation and during the shelf life and delivery to the end user, which will greatly facilitate the use and centralized supply of therapeutic RPs. The necessity of creating a unified approach for the selection of antioxidants at the pharmaceutical development stage of radiopharmaceuticals is shown. For this purpose, an approach combining studies of radical reaction kinetics with studies of radiation-chemical yields of radiolysis products under identical or maximally similar conditions with subsequent verification of the stability of RPs dosage form seems to be very promising and has proven to be effective. In contrast, the empirical approach, which implies the selection of radioprotectors based on a direct study of their influence on the preservation of the level of radiochemical purity, is suboptimal because of the high market value of both radionuclides and non-radioactive precursors.
抗氧化剂-放射防护剂在治疗性放射药物组合中的选择与应用(综述)
介绍。使用放射性药物进行靶向放射性核素治疗(TRT),其疗效是在临床试验中确定的,对包括癌症在内的各种病理状况是安全有效的。治疗性放射性药物(RPs)的主要特点是在最终剂型(FD)中使用β -和α-发射放射性核素(RNs)。在用于放射性核素治疗的放射性核素中,镥-177因其化学和核特性是目前临床应用最广泛的放射性核素之一。基于lutetium-177的rp名单不断扩大,Lutathera®([177 Lu]Lu- dota - tate)和Pluvicto™([177 Lu]Lu- psma -617)已在多个国家被批准临床使用。文本。由于RNs在单剂量治疗性RPs中具有高活性(177 Lu单剂量可达8 GBq),由于载体分子的辐射降解,使用的RNs的电离辐射导致RPs质量下降。这导致病理病灶放射性特异性积累减少,治疗效果降低,并可能增加对非靶器官和组织的放射毒性风险。载体分子的放射性降解程度和强度以及rp的保质期取决于许多因素,其中制备过程中放射性核素的活性浓度、半衰期和发射粒子的能量是最重要的。为了抑制辐射溶解的影响,各种具有抗氧化(辐射防护)特性的赋形剂被引入到成品剂型的组成中。在研究的物质中,最受欢迎的是龙胆酸、抗坏血酸和乙醇。在本工作中,考虑了各种抗氧化剂及其组合用于治疗性rp的优缺点。结论。选择剂型的最佳组合是一项紧迫的任务,因为它将确保在制备时以及在保质期和交付给最终用户期间的高质量rp,这将极大地促进治疗性rp的使用和集中供应。指出了在放射性药物的药物开发阶段建立统一的抗氧化剂选择方法的必要性。为此,将自由基反应动力学研究与相同或最相似条件下辐射分解产物的辐射化学产率研究结合起来,并随后验证rp剂型的稳定性,似乎是非常有前途的,并且已被证明是有效的。相比之下,经验方法意味着根据对放射性防护剂对保持放射化学纯度水平的影响的直接研究来选择放射性防护剂,这是次优方法,因为放射性核素和非放射性前体的市场价值都很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Development and Registration
Drug Development and Registration Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信