Reconceptualising organised (cyber)crime: The case of ransomware

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Chad Whelan, David Bright, James Martin
{"title":"Reconceptualising organised (cyber)crime: The case of ransomware","authors":"Chad Whelan, David Bright, James Martin","doi":"10.1177/26338076231199793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of organised cybercrime has been the subject of much debate over the last decade. Many researchers who have applied scholarly definitions of organised crime to cyber-criminal groups have concluded that such groups are not “organised criminal groups” and do not engage in “organised crime”. This paper adopts a different perspective to argue that certain cyber-criminal groups involved in ransomware can and should be considered organised crime if a more contemporary and flexible framework for conceptualising organised crime is adopted. We make this argument using three primary domains of organised crime first described by von Lampe: criminal activities, offender social structures, and extra-legal governance. We narrow in on the concepts of violence and extra-legal governance in particular as they have been interpreted to hold significant differences for criminal groups operating in physical and digital domains. The paper argues that it is time to move on from criminological debates regarding whether organised cybercrime can exist to focus on the many rich questions that researchers can take from organised crime scholarship and apply to cyber-criminal groups. We put forward a reconceptualisation of organised cybercrime towards this end.","PeriodicalId":29902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminology","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076231199793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of organised cybercrime has been the subject of much debate over the last decade. Many researchers who have applied scholarly definitions of organised crime to cyber-criminal groups have concluded that such groups are not “organised criminal groups” and do not engage in “organised crime”. This paper adopts a different perspective to argue that certain cyber-criminal groups involved in ransomware can and should be considered organised crime if a more contemporary and flexible framework for conceptualising organised crime is adopted. We make this argument using three primary domains of organised crime first described by von Lampe: criminal activities, offender social structures, and extra-legal governance. We narrow in on the concepts of violence and extra-legal governance in particular as they have been interpreted to hold significant differences for criminal groups operating in physical and digital domains. The paper argues that it is time to move on from criminological debates regarding whether organised cybercrime can exist to focus on the many rich questions that researchers can take from organised crime scholarship and apply to cyber-criminal groups. We put forward a reconceptualisation of organised cybercrime towards this end.
重新定义有组织(网络)犯罪:勒索软件案例
在过去的十年里,有组织网络犯罪的概念一直是争论不休的话题。许多将有组织犯罪的学术定义应用于网络犯罪集团的研究人员得出结论,这些集团不是“有组织犯罪集团”,也不参与“有组织犯罪”。本文采用了不同的观点,认为如果采用更现代、更灵活的有组织犯罪概念框架,涉及勒索软件的某些网络犯罪集团可以而且应该被视为有组织犯罪。我们利用冯·兰普首先描述的有组织犯罪的三个主要领域来提出这一论点:犯罪活动、罪犯社会结构和法外治理。我们特别关注暴力和法外治理的概念,因为它们被解释为在实体和数字领域活动的犯罪集团之间存在重大差异。这篇论文认为,现在是时候从关于有组织网络犯罪是否可以存在的犯罪学辩论转向关注研究人员可以从有组织犯罪研究中获得并应用于网络犯罪集团的许多丰富问题了。为此,我们提出了对有组织网络犯罪的重新定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Criminology
Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信