Challenges faced by manufacturers with clinical evaluation under the new European Medical Device Regulations

IF 2.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Breda Kearney, Olivia McDermott
{"title":"Challenges faced by manufacturers with clinical evaluation under the new European Medical Device Regulations","authors":"Breda Kearney, Olivia McDermott","doi":"10.1080/23311916.2023.2261236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study seeks to investigate the impact of strengthened requirements for clinical evaluation for medical device manufacturers in Europe due to the new Medical Device Regulations. Qualitative interviews were conducted with eight clinical evaluation consultants from eight different European countries who review and approve clinical evaluation reports for manufacturers prior to their submission to notified bodies. The study describes the sources of device clinical evaluation evidence and describes the consultants’ recommendations and challenges encountered when reviewing Clinical Evaluation Reports. The findings from the study demonstrate that understanding what constitutes sufficient clinical evidence poses the biggest challenge to the generation of an MDR-compliant Clinical Evaluation Report. Additionally, the study identified a knowledge and skills gap in the generation and assessment of acceptable regulatory and clinical data. Further, there is heterogeneity in the reviews of Clinical Evaluation Reports received by consultants and inadequate guidance to enable compliance by manufacturers. This study found that some manufacturers of certain CE-marked medical devices are planning to remove them from the EU market upon expiration of their certificate, and in the case of new innovative devices, some manufacturers may launch in other non-EU markets.","PeriodicalId":10464,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Engineering","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2261236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study seeks to investigate the impact of strengthened requirements for clinical evaluation for medical device manufacturers in Europe due to the new Medical Device Regulations. Qualitative interviews were conducted with eight clinical evaluation consultants from eight different European countries who review and approve clinical evaluation reports for manufacturers prior to their submission to notified bodies. The study describes the sources of device clinical evaluation evidence and describes the consultants’ recommendations and challenges encountered when reviewing Clinical Evaluation Reports. The findings from the study demonstrate that understanding what constitutes sufficient clinical evidence poses the biggest challenge to the generation of an MDR-compliant Clinical Evaluation Report. Additionally, the study identified a knowledge and skills gap in the generation and assessment of acceptable regulatory and clinical data. Further, there is heterogeneity in the reviews of Clinical Evaluation Reports received by consultants and inadequate guidance to enable compliance by manufacturers. This study found that some manufacturers of certain CE-marked medical devices are planning to remove them from the EU market upon expiration of their certificate, and in the case of new innovative devices, some manufacturers may launch in other non-EU markets.
制造商在新的欧洲医疗器械法规下进行临床评估所面临的挑战
本研究旨在调查由于新的医疗器械法规而加强对欧洲医疗器械制造商临床评估要求的影响。对来自8个不同欧洲国家的8名临床评价顾问进行了定性访谈,这些顾问负责在制造商向公告机构提交临床评价报告之前对其进行审查和批准。该研究描述了器械临床评估证据的来源,并描述了在审查临床评估报告时顾问的建议和遇到的挑战。这项研究的结果表明,理解什么是充分的临床证据,是编写耐多药依从性临床评估报告的最大挑战。此外,该研究还发现,在可接受的监管和临床数据的生成和评估方面存在知识和技能差距。此外,咨询师收到的临床评估报告的审查存在异质性,并且没有足够的指导使制造商能够遵守。本研究发现,某些带有ce标志的医疗器械的一些制造商正计划在其证书到期后将其从欧盟市场移除,而对于新的创新器械,一些制造商可能会在其他非欧盟市场推出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cogent Engineering
Cogent Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
213
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: One of the largest, multidisciplinary open access engineering journals of peer-reviewed research, Cogent Engineering, part of the Taylor & Francis Group, covers all areas of engineering and technology, from chemical engineering to computer science, and mechanical to materials engineering. Cogent Engineering encourages interdisciplinary research and also accepts negative results, software article, replication studies and reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信