Short-term SARS-CoV-2 re-infection rate in vaccinated health workers based on received vaccines: A cross-sectional study

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Reza Sinaei, Maedeh Jafari, Rezvan Karamozian, Sara Pezeshki, Roya Sinaei, Fatemeh Karami Robati, Mehrnoush Hassas Yeganeh, Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh
{"title":"Short-term SARS-CoV-2 re-infection rate in vaccinated health workers based on received vaccines: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Reza Sinaei, Maedeh Jafari, Rezvan Karamozian, Sara Pezeshki, Roya Sinaei, Fatemeh Karami Robati, Mehrnoush Hassas Yeganeh, Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh","doi":"10.2174/1573398x19666230911094423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vaccines during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic entered the market faster than a routine proportionate evaluation cycle. The highest number of deaths and morbidities, especially by the type of B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant, is one of the reasons for this inevitability. Accordingly, evaluation of the effects of vaccines is of great importance Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the effects of four current COVID-19 vaccines, such as AstraZeneca, Sputnik, Sinopharm, and Bharat, and the prevalence of COVID-19 occurrence among 600 vaccinated healthcare workers (HCWs) in the Southeast of Iran. Results: The incidence of infection among vaccinated HCWs was 36.3%, without any age and gender difference, statistically. The infection rate with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus- 2 (SARS-CoV-2) following immunization with AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, Bharat, and Sinopharm vaccines were 45.8%, 41.3%, 36.9%, and 18.6%, respectively (P.V=0.001). Those who had a history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were more affected again despite vaccination (P.V=0.001). However, out of 218 infected patients, only six patients (2.8%) were hospitalized, while 26 patients (11.9%) received remdesivir and two patients (0.9%) needed to additional target therapy with Iinterleukin-6 inhibitor of Tocilizumab due to cytokine storm. Conclusion: During B.1.617.2 circulating variant, all vaccines after a complete vaccination schedule were relatively associated with protection against severe infection and hospitalization. We found that people who received the Sinopharm vaccine had the lowest incidence of COVID-19 (18.7%), followed by Bharat. The lowest incidence of protection occurred with viral vector-based vaccines, especially AstraZeneca.","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x19666230911094423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaccines during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic entered the market faster than a routine proportionate evaluation cycle. The highest number of deaths and morbidities, especially by the type of B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant, is one of the reasons for this inevitability. Accordingly, evaluation of the effects of vaccines is of great importance Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the effects of four current COVID-19 vaccines, such as AstraZeneca, Sputnik, Sinopharm, and Bharat, and the prevalence of COVID-19 occurrence among 600 vaccinated healthcare workers (HCWs) in the Southeast of Iran. Results: The incidence of infection among vaccinated HCWs was 36.3%, without any age and gender difference, statistically. The infection rate with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus- 2 (SARS-CoV-2) following immunization with AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, Bharat, and Sinopharm vaccines were 45.8%, 41.3%, 36.9%, and 18.6%, respectively (P.V=0.001). Those who had a history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were more affected again despite vaccination (P.V=0.001). However, out of 218 infected patients, only six patients (2.8%) were hospitalized, while 26 patients (11.9%) received remdesivir and two patients (0.9%) needed to additional target therapy with Iinterleukin-6 inhibitor of Tocilizumab due to cytokine storm. Conclusion: During B.1.617.2 circulating variant, all vaccines after a complete vaccination schedule were relatively associated with protection against severe infection and hospitalization. We found that people who received the Sinopharm vaccine had the lowest incidence of COVID-19 (18.7%), followed by Bharat. The lowest incidence of protection occurred with viral vector-based vaccines, especially AstraZeneca.
基于接种疫苗的卫生工作者短期SARS-CoV-2再感染率:一项横断面研究
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的疫苗进入市场的速度超过了常规的比例评估周期。死亡率和发病率最高,特别是B.1.617.2 (Delta)型变异的死亡率和发病率最高,是造成这种必然性的原因之一。方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们调查了阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)、斯普特尼克(Sputnik)、国药(Sinopharm)和巴拉特(Bharat)四种现有COVID-19疫苗的效果,以及伊朗东南部600名接种疫苗的医护人员(HCWs)的COVID-19患病率。结果:接种疫苗的医护人员感染发生率为36.3%,无年龄、性别差异。阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)、Sputnik V、Bharat和国药集团(Sinopharm)疫苗接种后的SARS-CoV-2感染率分别为45.8%、41.3%、36.9%和18.6% (p =0.001)。既往有SARS-CoV-2感染史的患者尽管接种了疫苗,但再次感染的可能性更大(P.V=0.001)。然而,在218名感染患者中,只有6名患者(2.8%)住院,而26名患者(11.9%)接受了瑞德西韦,2名患者(0.9%)由于细胞因子风暴需要额外的白介素-6抑制剂Tocilizumab靶向治疗。结论:在B.1.617.2流行变异体中,完整接种计划后的所有疫苗均与预防严重感染和住院相对相关。我们发现,接种国药集团疫苗的人群COVID-19发病率最低(18.7%),其次是巴拉特。以病毒载体为基础的疫苗的保护发生率最低,尤其是阿斯利康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on respiratory diseases and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信