Performance Evaluation of Artificial Neural Network Modelling to a Ploughing Unit in Various Soil Conditions

IF 1.3 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ghazwan A. Dahham, Mahmood N. Al-Irhayim, Khalid E. Al-Mistawi, Montaser Kh. Khessro
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Artificial Neural Network Modelling to a Ploughing Unit in Various Soil Conditions","authors":"Ghazwan A. Dahham, Mahmood N. Al-Irhayim, Khalid E. Al-Mistawi, Montaser Kh. Khessro","doi":"10.2478/ata-2023-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The specific objective of this study is to find a suitable artificial neural network model for estimating the operation indicators (disturbed soil volume, effective field capacity, draft force, and energy requirement) of ploughing units (tractor disc) in various soil conditions. The experiment involved two different factors, i.e., (Ι) soil texture index and (ΙΙ) field work index, and included soil moisture content, tractor engine power, soil bulk density, tillage speed, tillage depth, and tillage width, which were linked to one dimensionless index. We assessed the effectiveness of artificial neural network and multiple linear regression models between the values predicted and the actual values using the mean absolute error criterion to test data points. When the artificial neural network model was applied, the mean absolute error values for disturbed soil volume, effective field capacity, draft force, and energy requirement were 69.41 m 3 ·hr −1 , 0.04 ha·hr −1 , 1.24 kN, and 1.95 kw·hr·ha −1 , respectively. In order to evaluate the behaviour of new models, the coefficient R 2 was used as a criterion, where R 2 values in artificial neural network were 0.9872, 0.9553, 0.9948, and 0.9718, respectively, for the aforementioned testing dataset. Simultaneously, R 2 values in multiple linear regression were 0.7623, 0.696, 0.492, and 0.5572, respectively, for the same testing dataset. Based on these comparisons, it was clear that predictions using the artificial neural network models proposed are very satisfactory.","PeriodicalId":43089,"journal":{"name":"Acta Technologica Agriculturae","volume":"119 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Technologica Agriculturae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2023-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The specific objective of this study is to find a suitable artificial neural network model for estimating the operation indicators (disturbed soil volume, effective field capacity, draft force, and energy requirement) of ploughing units (tractor disc) in various soil conditions. The experiment involved two different factors, i.e., (Ι) soil texture index and (ΙΙ) field work index, and included soil moisture content, tractor engine power, soil bulk density, tillage speed, tillage depth, and tillage width, which were linked to one dimensionless index. We assessed the effectiveness of artificial neural network and multiple linear regression models between the values predicted and the actual values using the mean absolute error criterion to test data points. When the artificial neural network model was applied, the mean absolute error values for disturbed soil volume, effective field capacity, draft force, and energy requirement were 69.41 m 3 ·hr −1 , 0.04 ha·hr −1 , 1.24 kN, and 1.95 kw·hr·ha −1 , respectively. In order to evaluate the behaviour of new models, the coefficient R 2 was used as a criterion, where R 2 values in artificial neural network were 0.9872, 0.9553, 0.9948, and 0.9718, respectively, for the aforementioned testing dataset. Simultaneously, R 2 values in multiple linear regression were 0.7623, 0.696, 0.492, and 0.5572, respectively, for the same testing dataset. Based on these comparisons, it was clear that predictions using the artificial neural network models proposed are very satisfactory.
不同土壤条件下耕作装置人工神经网络建模性能评价
摘要本研究的具体目的是寻找一种合适的人工神经网络模型来估计不同土壤条件下耕作装置(拖拉机盘)的运行指标(扰动土壤体积、有效田间容量、牵引力和能量需求)。试验涉及(Ι)土壤质地指数和(ΙΙ)田间作业指数两个不同的因子,包括土壤含水量、拖拉机发动机功率、土壤容重、耕作速度、耕作深度和耕作宽度,这些因子与一个无量纲指标联系在一起。我们使用平均绝对误差准则来测试数据点,评估了人工神经网络和多元线性回归模型在预测值与实际值之间的有效性。应用人工神经网络模型时,扰动土体积、有效田间容量、牵引力和能量需求的平均绝对误差分别为69.41 m 3·hr−1、0.04 ha·hr−1、1.24 kN和1.95 kw·hr·ha−1。为了评估新模型的行为,使用系数r2作为标准,其中对于上述测试数据集,人工神经网络中的r2值分别为0.9872,0.9553,0.9948和0.9718。同时,对于同一测试数据集,多元线性回归的r2值分别为0.7623、0.696、0.492和0.5572。基于这些比较,很明显,使用人工神经网络模型提出的预测是非常令人满意的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Technologica Agriculturae
Acta Technologica Agriculturae AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Technologica Agriculturae is an international scientific double-blind peer reviewed journal focused on agricultural engineering. The journal is multidisciplinary and publishes original research and review papers in engineering, agricultural and biological sciences, and materials science. Aims and Scope Areas of interest include but are not limited to: agricultural and biosystems engineering; machines and mechanization of agricultural production; information and electrical technologies; agro-product and food processing engineering; physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic, soil working machinery and terramechanics; renewable energy sources and bioenergy; rural buildings; related issues from applied physics and chemistry, ecology, economy and energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信