Assessment of the Quality of Online Patient-Oriented Information on Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Grace Amaefule-Orie, Constantine Ezeme, Trevor Yeung
{"title":"Assessment of the Quality of Online Patient-Oriented Information on Robotic Colorectal Surgery","authors":"Grace Amaefule-Orie, Constantine Ezeme, Trevor Yeung","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3581480/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract INTRODUCTION With advances in modern medicine, there is a constant need for accurate and up-to-date readily available information online to ensure patients are well-equipped for informed decision making. AIM This study sets out to analyze websites that provide patient-centered information on robotic colorectal surgery. METHOD Three search engines (Google, Yahoo and Firefox) were used with search terms ‘robotic colorectal surgery’ and the first twenty results on each platform assessed. After screening sites using predetermined criteria, further analysis was performed with the DISCERN questionnaire and Cohen Kappa analysis. RESULTS Out of the 60 websites identified from the initial search, only 14 websites contained patient information on robotic colorectal surgery. Of these, only three (21%) sites had been updated in the past year and one site was last updated ten years ago. Ten (71%) websites were affiliated with hospitals and the majority (12, 86%) were based in the United States of America (USA). Approximately half of the websites explored alternative surgical techniques, only three (21%) discussed the risks, a similar number had details on post-operative experience, and none mentioned cost implications, ongoing research or the waiting list involved. Overall, no website had a perfect score of 5 to be classified as good or excellent. There was at least a fair level of agreement (reliability score of >0.2) in twelve DISCERN criteria (80%), four of which were statistically significant. CONCLUSION Despite the huge volume of generic information on colorectal surgery, there is still a paucity of comprehensive patient-centered information on robotics as a modality of treatment. CORRESPONDENCE: Grace Oluchi Amaefule-Orie M.B.B.S., MPH. Email oluchyorie@yahoo.com","PeriodicalId":500086,"journal":{"name":"Research Square (Research Square)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square (Research Square)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3581480/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION With advances in modern medicine, there is a constant need for accurate and up-to-date readily available information online to ensure patients are well-equipped for informed decision making. AIM This study sets out to analyze websites that provide patient-centered information on robotic colorectal surgery. METHOD Three search engines (Google, Yahoo and Firefox) were used with search terms ‘robotic colorectal surgery’ and the first twenty results on each platform assessed. After screening sites using predetermined criteria, further analysis was performed with the DISCERN questionnaire and Cohen Kappa analysis. RESULTS Out of the 60 websites identified from the initial search, only 14 websites contained patient information on robotic colorectal surgery. Of these, only three (21%) sites had been updated in the past year and one site was last updated ten years ago. Ten (71%) websites were affiliated with hospitals and the majority (12, 86%) were based in the United States of America (USA). Approximately half of the websites explored alternative surgical techniques, only three (21%) discussed the risks, a similar number had details on post-operative experience, and none mentioned cost implications, ongoing research or the waiting list involved. Overall, no website had a perfect score of 5 to be classified as good or excellent. There was at least a fair level of agreement (reliability score of >0.2) in twelve DISCERN criteria (80%), four of which were statistically significant. CONCLUSION Despite the huge volume of generic information on colorectal surgery, there is still a paucity of comprehensive patient-centered information on robotics as a modality of treatment. CORRESPONDENCE: Grace Oluchi Amaefule-Orie M.B.B.S., MPH. Email oluchyorie@yahoo.com
以患者为导向的机器人结肠手术在线信息质量评估
随着现代医学的进步,人们不断需要准确的、最新的、随时可用的在线信息,以确保患者有充分的准备做出明智的决策。目的:本研究旨在分析提供以患者为中心的机器人结肠直肠手术信息的网站。方法使用三个搜索引擎(Google, Yahoo和Firefox)搜索“机器人结肠直肠手术”,并对每个平台上的前20个结果进行评估。在使用预定标准筛选站点后,使用DISCERN问卷和Cohen Kappa分析进行进一步分析。结果:从最初的搜索中确定的60个网站中,只有14个网站包含机器人结肠直肠手术的患者信息。在这些网站中,只有3个(21%)网站在过去一年中进行了更新,其中一个网站最近一次更新是在十年前。10个(71%)网站隶属于医院,大多数(12.86%)位于美利坚合众国(USA)。大约一半的网站探讨了替代手术技术,只有三个(21%)讨论了风险,类似数量的网站详细介绍了术后经验,没有提到成本影响,正在进行的研究或所涉及的等待名单。总的来说,没有一个网站得到5分的满分,可以被归类为“好”或“优秀”。在12个DISCERN标准(80%)中至少有一个公平水平的一致性(可靠性评分为>0.2),其中4个具有统计显著性。结论:尽管有大量关于结直肠手术的通用信息,但仍缺乏以患者为中心的关于机器人技术作为一种治疗方式的全面信息。通信:Grace Oluchi Amaefule-Orie工商管理硕士,公共卫生硕士。电子邮件oluchyorie@yahoo.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信