AN ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH WRITING ERRORS IN EFL LEARNERS’ RECOUNT TEXT

Alisa Maulida Sari, Rahma Ayuditya Putri, Aldha Williyan
{"title":"AN ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH WRITING ERRORS IN EFL LEARNERS’ RECOUNT TEXT","authors":"Alisa Maulida Sari, Rahma Ayuditya Putri, Aldha Williyan","doi":"10.58660/nextgen.v1i1.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research discusses the analysis of students' errors in writing recount texts. This study aims to analyze the types of errors made by undergraduate students’ writing scores at the English Language Teaching Department at one of the universities in Cirebon. This study focuses on writing errors taken from three categories of English proficiency levels (low, average, high). This study used the descriptive qualitative method. There were six participants. The data were taken from their recount text writing results. The results of this study show that there are four types of errors based on Surface Strategy Taxonomy by students: Omission, Addition, Misinformation, and Misordering. The result of the total number of student errors is 37 which contains 14 Omission (37.83%), three Addition (8.11%), 19 Misinformation (51.36%), and one Misordering (2.70%). The most errors were made by Misinformation, with 19 errors (51.36%). It can be concluded that the ability of undergraduate students at one university in Cirebon is still low in writing recount text.","PeriodicalId":110734,"journal":{"name":"NextGen Education Review Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NextGen Education Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58660/nextgen.v1i1.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research discusses the analysis of students' errors in writing recount texts. This study aims to analyze the types of errors made by undergraduate students’ writing scores at the English Language Teaching Department at one of the universities in Cirebon. This study focuses on writing errors taken from three categories of English proficiency levels (low, average, high). This study used the descriptive qualitative method. There were six participants. The data were taken from their recount text writing results. The results of this study show that there are four types of errors based on Surface Strategy Taxonomy by students: Omission, Addition, Misinformation, and Misordering. The result of the total number of student errors is 37 which contains 14 Omission (37.83%), three Addition (8.11%), 19 Misinformation (51.36%), and one Misordering (2.70%). The most errors were made by Misinformation, with 19 errors (51.36%). It can be concluded that the ability of undergraduate students at one university in Cirebon is still low in writing recount text.
英语学习者复述语篇中的英语写作错误分析
本研究探讨了学生在叙述文本写作中的错误分析。本研究旨在分析喀土邦某高校英语教学系本科生写作成绩的错误类型。本研究主要从英语熟练程度(低、中、高)三个类别来分析写作错误。本研究采用描述性定性方法。共有6名参与者。数据取自他们的重述文本写作结果。本研究结果表明,基于表面策略分类法的学生错误有四种类型:遗漏、添加、错误信息和错误排序。学生错误总数为37个,其中遗漏14个(37.83%),添加3个(8.11%),Misinformation 19个(51.36%),Misordering 1个(2.70%)。错误最多的是Misinformation,有19个错误(51.36%)。可以得出结论,该地区一所大学的本科生在撰写叙述文本方面的能力仍然较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书