Investigating harms of testing for ovarian cancer - psychological outcomes and cancer conversion rates in women with symptoms of ovarian cancer: a cohort study embedded in the multicentre ROCkeTS prospective diagnostic study

Audrey Kwong, Caroline Kristunas, Clare Davenport, Ridhi Aggarwal, Jonathan Deeks, Sue Mallett, Sean Kehoe, Dirk Timmerman, Tom Bourne, Hilary Stobart, Richard Neal, Usha Menon, Alexandra Gentry-Maharaj, Lauren Sturdy, Ryan Ottridge, Sudha Sundar
{"title":"Investigating harms of testing for ovarian cancer - psychological outcomes and cancer conversion rates in women with symptoms of ovarian cancer: a cohort study embedded in the multicentre ROCkeTS prospective diagnostic study","authors":"Audrey Kwong, Caroline Kristunas, Clare Davenport, Ridhi Aggarwal, Jonathan Deeks, Sue Mallett, Sean Kehoe, Dirk Timmerman, Tom Bourne, Hilary Stobart, Richard Neal, Usha Menon, Alexandra Gentry-Maharaj, Lauren Sturdy, Ryan Ottridge, Sudha Sundar","doi":"10.22541/au.169994771.15159489/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To investigate psychological correlates in women referred with suspected ovarian cancer via the fast-track pathway, explore how anxiety and distress levels change 12 months post-testing and report cancer conversion rates by age and referral pathway. Design: Single arm prospective cohort study Setting: Multicentre. Secondary care including outpatient clinics and emergency admissions. Participants: 2596 newly presenting symptomatic women with a raised CA125 level, abnormal imaging or both. Methods: Women completed anxiety and distress questionnaires at recruitment and at 12 months for those who had not undergone surgery or a biopsy within 3 months of recruitment. Main outcome measures: Anxiety and distress levels measured using STAI-6 and IES-r questionnaires. OC conversion rates by age, menopausal status and referral pathway. Results: 1355/2596 (52.1%) and 1781/2596 (68.6%) experienced moderate-to-severe distress and anxiety at recruitment. Younger age and emergency presentations had higher distress levels. Clinical category for anxiety and distress remained unchanged/worsened in 76% at 12 months despite a non-cancer diagnosis. OC rates by age were 1.6% (95% CI 0.5 to 5.9) under 40 and 10.9 % (95% CI 8.7 to 13.6) over 40 years. In women referred through fast-track pathways, 3.3% (95% CI 1.9 to 5.7) of pre- and 18.5% (95% CI 16.1 to 21.0) of postmenopausal women were diagnosed with OC. Conclusions: Women undergoing diagnostic testing display severe anxiety and distress. Younger women are especially vulnerable and should be targeted for support. Women under 40 have low conversion rates and we advocate reducing testing in this group to reduce harms of testing.","PeriodicalId":487619,"journal":{"name":"Authorea (Authorea)","volume":"31 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Authorea (Authorea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22541/au.169994771.15159489/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate psychological correlates in women referred with suspected ovarian cancer via the fast-track pathway, explore how anxiety and distress levels change 12 months post-testing and report cancer conversion rates by age and referral pathway. Design: Single arm prospective cohort study Setting: Multicentre. Secondary care including outpatient clinics and emergency admissions. Participants: 2596 newly presenting symptomatic women with a raised CA125 level, abnormal imaging or both. Methods: Women completed anxiety and distress questionnaires at recruitment and at 12 months for those who had not undergone surgery or a biopsy within 3 months of recruitment. Main outcome measures: Anxiety and distress levels measured using STAI-6 and IES-r questionnaires. OC conversion rates by age, menopausal status and referral pathway. Results: 1355/2596 (52.1%) and 1781/2596 (68.6%) experienced moderate-to-severe distress and anxiety at recruitment. Younger age and emergency presentations had higher distress levels. Clinical category for anxiety and distress remained unchanged/worsened in 76% at 12 months despite a non-cancer diagnosis. OC rates by age were 1.6% (95% CI 0.5 to 5.9) under 40 and 10.9 % (95% CI 8.7 to 13.6) over 40 years. In women referred through fast-track pathways, 3.3% (95% CI 1.9 to 5.7) of pre- and 18.5% (95% CI 16.1 to 21.0) of postmenopausal women were diagnosed with OC. Conclusions: Women undergoing diagnostic testing display severe anxiety and distress. Younger women are especially vulnerable and should be targeted for support. Women under 40 have low conversion rates and we advocate reducing testing in this group to reduce harms of testing.
调查卵巢癌检测的危害——有卵巢癌症状的妇女的心理结果和癌症转换率:多中心rocket前瞻性诊断研究中的一项队列研究
目的:研究通过快速通道转诊的疑似卵巢癌妇女的心理相关因素,探讨焦虑和痛苦水平在检测后12个月的变化,并报告不同年龄和转诊途径的癌症转换率。设计:单臂前瞻性队列研究设置:多中心。二级保健,包括门诊和急诊。参与者:2596名CA125水平升高、影像学异常或两者兼而有之的新出现症状的女性。方法:在入组时和入组12个月时,未接受手术或在入组3个月内未接受活检的妇女分别填写焦虑和痛苦问卷。主要结果测量:焦虑和痛苦水平使用STAI-6和IES-r问卷测量。按年龄、绝经状态和转诊途径划分的OC转换率。结果:1355/2596(52.1%)和1781/2596(68.6%)在招聘时经历过中重度的抑郁和焦虑。年龄越小和出现紧急情况的人的痛苦程度越高。尽管非癌症诊断,但焦虑和痛苦的临床类别在12个月内保持不变/恶化的比例为76%。40岁以下的OC率为1.6% (95% CI 0.5 ~ 5.9), 40岁以上的OC率为10.9% (95% CI 8.7 ~ 13.6)。在通过快速通道转诊的妇女中,3.3% (95% CI 1.9 - 5.7)的绝经前妇女和18.5% (95% CI 16.1 - 21.0)的绝经后妇女被诊断为卵巢癌。结论:接受诊断测试的妇女表现出严重的焦虑和痛苦。年轻女性尤其容易受到伤害,应该得到支持。40岁以下的女性转化率较低,我们提倡在这一群体中减少检测,以减少检测的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信