How do social and academic integration develop over time? Longitudinal analyses of differences based on students’ sociodemographic background

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Derya Özbağcı, Jonas Breetzke, Carla Bohndick
{"title":"How do social and academic integration develop over time? Longitudinal analyses of differences based on students’ sociodemographic background","authors":"Derya Özbağcı, Jonas Breetzke, Carla Bohndick","doi":"10.1080/21568235.2023.2279133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAlthough social and academic integration are considered significant predictors of academic success, little is known about their longitudinal development. In addition, cross-sectional research indicates differences in the integration process based on the sociodemographic background of students, but lacks longitudinal confirmation, especially in Germany. This research gap was addressed by examining students’ integration across three years with measures at four time points (N = 4270) based on data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) in Germany. Longitudinal growth curve analyses were conducted considering interindividual differences between four groups: first-generation students with and without a migration background, and continuing-generation students with and without a migration background. Differences in students’ social and academic integration, measured by several sub-dimensions, partly supported expected advantages for students from academic backgrounds without a migration background, both at the first time point and regarding the longitudinal development. Nevertheless, these differences were small and partly accompanied by non-significant findings highlighting similarities across students. Assumptions about differences between students and implications for future research on the longitudinal development of student integration are discussed.KEYWORDS: Higher educationsocial integrationacademic integrationfirst-generation studentsmigration background Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availabilityThis paper uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS): Starting Cohort 5, https://doi.org/10.5157/NEPS:SC5:15.0.0.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDerya ÖzbağcıDerya Özbağcı is a researcher at the University of Hamburg within the Hamburg Center for University Teaching and Learning. Her research areas include the sense of belonging of students and social inequalities in higher education.Jonas BreetzkeJonas Breetzke is a PhD candidate and research assistant at the Hamburg Center for University Teaching and Learning. His research focuses mainly on study success and the subjective study values of higher education students.Carla BohndickCarla Bohndick is an assistant professor at Hamburg Center for University Teaching and Learning. She received her PhD from Paderborn University. Her research focuses on study success, diversity and the fit between students and the university.","PeriodicalId":37345,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Higher Education","volume":"19 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2279133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTAlthough social and academic integration are considered significant predictors of academic success, little is known about their longitudinal development. In addition, cross-sectional research indicates differences in the integration process based on the sociodemographic background of students, but lacks longitudinal confirmation, especially in Germany. This research gap was addressed by examining students’ integration across three years with measures at four time points (N = 4270) based on data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) in Germany. Longitudinal growth curve analyses were conducted considering interindividual differences between four groups: first-generation students with and without a migration background, and continuing-generation students with and without a migration background. Differences in students’ social and academic integration, measured by several sub-dimensions, partly supported expected advantages for students from academic backgrounds without a migration background, both at the first time point and regarding the longitudinal development. Nevertheless, these differences were small and partly accompanied by non-significant findings highlighting similarities across students. Assumptions about differences between students and implications for future research on the longitudinal development of student integration are discussed.KEYWORDS: Higher educationsocial integrationacademic integrationfirst-generation studentsmigration background Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availabilityThis paper uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS): Starting Cohort 5, https://doi.org/10.5157/NEPS:SC5:15.0.0.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDerya ÖzbağcıDerya Özbağcı is a researcher at the University of Hamburg within the Hamburg Center for University Teaching and Learning. Her research areas include the sense of belonging of students and social inequalities in higher education.Jonas BreetzkeJonas Breetzke is a PhD candidate and research assistant at the Hamburg Center for University Teaching and Learning. His research focuses mainly on study success and the subjective study values of higher education students.Carla BohndickCarla Bohndick is an assistant professor at Hamburg Center for University Teaching and Learning. She received her PhD from Paderborn University. Her research focuses on study success, diversity and the fit between students and the university.
随着时间的推移,社会和学术融合是如何发展的?基于学生社会人口背景差异的纵向分析
虽然社会和学术整合被认为是学业成功的重要预测因素,但人们对它们的纵向发展知之甚少。此外,横断面研究表明,基于学生社会人口背景的整合过程存在差异,但缺乏纵向证实,特别是在德国。根据德国国家教育小组研究(NEPS)的数据,通过在四个时间点(N = 4270)测量学生三年的整合情况,解决了这一研究差距。纵向生长曲线分析考虑了四组之间的个体差异:有和没有移民背景的第一代学生,有和没有移民背景的第二代学生。通过几个子维度测量的学生社会和学术整合的差异,在一定程度上支持了没有移民背景的学术背景学生在第一个时间点和纵向发展方面的预期优势。然而,这些差异很小,并且在一定程度上伴随着非显著的发现,突出了学生之间的相似性。讨论了学生间差异的假设以及对未来学生整合纵向发展研究的启示。关键词:高等教育社会融合学术融合第一代学生移民背景披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突数据可用性本文使用的数据来自国家教育小组研究(NEPS):起始队列5,https://doi.org/10.5157/NEPS:SC5:15.0.0.Additional信息贡献者说明derya ÖzbağcıDerya Özbağcı是汉堡大学教学和学习中心的一名研究员。她的研究领域包括学生的归属感和高等教育中的社会不平等。Jonas Breetzke是汉堡大学教学中心的博士候选人和研究助理。他的研究主要集中在学习成功和高等教育学生的主观学习价值观。Carla Bohndick是汉堡大学教学中心的助理教授。她在帕德博恩大学获得博士学位。她的研究重点是学习成功、多样性以及学生与大学之间的契合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Higher Education
European Journal of Higher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Higher Education (EJHE) aims to offer comprehensive coverage of theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of higher education, analyses of European and national higher education reforms and processes, and European comparative studies or comparisons between European and non-European higher education systems and institutions. Building on the successful legacy of its predecessor, Higher Education in Europe, EJHE is establishing itself as one of the flagship journals in the study of higher education and specifically in study of European higher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信