A Generalization of Beall’s Off-Topic Interpretation

IF 0.6 3区 数学 Q2 LOGIC
Yang Song, Hitoshi Omori, Jonas R. B. Arenhart, Satoshi Tojo
{"title":"A Generalization of Beall’s Off-Topic Interpretation","authors":"Yang Song, Hitoshi Omori, Jonas R. B. Arenhart, Satoshi Tojo","doi":"10.1007/s11225-023-10075-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In one of his papers, JC Beall advanced a new and interesting interpretation of Weak Kleene logic, in terms of on-topic/off-topic. In brief, Beall suggests to read the third value as off-topic , whereas the two classical values are read as true and on-topic and false and on-topic . Building on Beall’s new interpretation, the aim of this paper is threefold. First, we discuss two motivations to enrich Beall’s interpretation, and offer an alternative semantic framework that reflects our motivations. Second, by making use of our new framework, we will offer a new interpretation of the logic of Catuskoti which combines Beall’s proposal of having FDE as the correct logic with the on-topic/off-topic divide. Finally, we will offer a general result that will allow us to make sense of a family of infectious logics in terms of Beall’s on-topic/off-topic reading.","PeriodicalId":48979,"journal":{"name":"Studia Logica","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Logica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-023-10075-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In one of his papers, JC Beall advanced a new and interesting interpretation of Weak Kleene logic, in terms of on-topic/off-topic. In brief, Beall suggests to read the third value as off-topic , whereas the two classical values are read as true and on-topic and false and on-topic . Building on Beall’s new interpretation, the aim of this paper is threefold. First, we discuss two motivations to enrich Beall’s interpretation, and offer an alternative semantic framework that reflects our motivations. Second, by making use of our new framework, we will offer a new interpretation of the logic of Catuskoti which combines Beall’s proposal of having FDE as the correct logic with the on-topic/off-topic divide. Finally, we will offer a general result that will allow us to make sense of a family of infectious logics in terms of Beall’s on-topic/off-topic reading.
比尔离题解释的概括
在他的一篇论文中,JC Beall提出了一种新的、有趣的弱Kleene逻辑解释,即关于话题/非话题的解释。简而言之,Beall建议将第三个值读为off-topic,而将两个经典值读为true and on-topic和false and on-topic。以比尔的新解释为基础,本文的目的有三个方面。首先,我们讨论了两个动机来丰富Beall的解释,并提供了一个反映我们动机的替代语义框架。其次,通过使用我们的新框架,我们将提供Catuskoti逻辑的新解释,该解释将Beall提出的将FDE作为正确逻辑的建议与主题/主题划分相结合。最后,我们将提供一个一般的结果,使我们能够根据比尔的主题/非主题阅读来理解传染性逻辑家族。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Logica
Studia Logica MATHEMATICS-LOGIC
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading idea of Lvov-Warsaw School of Logic, Philosophy and Mathematics was to investigate philosophical problems by means of rigorous methods of mathematics. Evidence of the great success the School experienced is the fact that it has become generally recognized as Polish Style Logic. Today Polish Style Logic is no longer exclusively a Polish speciality. It is represented by numerous logicians, mathematicians and philosophers from research centers all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信