Ways public health users interact with online health information: a qualitative study

IF 3.1 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Lívia G Fernandes, Karime A Mescouto, Leonardo O P Costa, Bruno Tirotti Saragiotto
{"title":"Ways public health users interact with online health information: a qualitative study","authors":"Lívia G Fernandes, Karime A Mescouto, Leonardo O P Costa, Bruno Tirotti Saragiotto","doi":"10.1007/s12553-023-00784-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose The use of internet for health-related purposes has increased in the past years; however, the overabundance of information led the world to a health “infodemic”. Little is known about the ways public health users seek health information online and how it influences the relationship between patients and healthcare practitioners. We aimed to investigate how public health users seek health information online and how this practice affects health encounters. Methods We conducted a qualitative study in a public secondary level healthcare facility. Thirty participants were interviewed using a semi-structured grid designed upon the definition of digital health literacy. Participants were mostly women with an average age of 50 years old and educational level equal to or lower than high school degree. Traditionally and digitally illiterate participants participated in the study. Data analysis was performed using a reflexive thematic analysis underpinned by critical theory. Results We identified three interrelated themes: (1) failing to be a digitally engaged patient, (2) health information on the internet resonates better with individuals’ literacy, and (3) vulnerability is welcomed on the internet. Themes explored power dynamics that appeared to be mediated by formal knowledge, sociocultural contexts, use of technical language, and the presence of emotional and affective domains. Conclusion Our findings suggest that health information online might facilitate the understanding of technical terms and fill an emotional gap often overlooked by healthcare practitioners. Findings may assist health professionals in developing ways of considering health information online as part of the health encounter.","PeriodicalId":12941,"journal":{"name":"Health and Technology","volume":"300 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00784-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The use of internet for health-related purposes has increased in the past years; however, the overabundance of information led the world to a health “infodemic”. Little is known about the ways public health users seek health information online and how it influences the relationship between patients and healthcare practitioners. We aimed to investigate how public health users seek health information online and how this practice affects health encounters. Methods We conducted a qualitative study in a public secondary level healthcare facility. Thirty participants were interviewed using a semi-structured grid designed upon the definition of digital health literacy. Participants were mostly women with an average age of 50 years old and educational level equal to or lower than high school degree. Traditionally and digitally illiterate participants participated in the study. Data analysis was performed using a reflexive thematic analysis underpinned by critical theory. Results We identified three interrelated themes: (1) failing to be a digitally engaged patient, (2) health information on the internet resonates better with individuals’ literacy, and (3) vulnerability is welcomed on the internet. Themes explored power dynamics that appeared to be mediated by formal knowledge, sociocultural contexts, use of technical language, and the presence of emotional and affective domains. Conclusion Our findings suggest that health information online might facilitate the understanding of technical terms and fill an emotional gap often overlooked by healthcare practitioners. Findings may assist health professionals in developing ways of considering health information online as part of the health encounter.
公共卫生用户与在线卫生信息互动的方式:一项定性研究
在过去的几年里,与健康相关的互联网使用有所增加;然而,信息的过剩导致世界出现了卫生“信息大流行”。关于公共卫生用户在线寻求健康信息的方式以及它如何影响患者和医疗保健从业人员之间的关系,人们知之甚少。我们的目的是调查公共卫生用户如何在网上寻求健康信息,以及这种做法如何影响健康遭遇。方法对某公立二级医疗机构进行定性研究。使用根据数字健康素养定义设计的半结构化网格对30名参与者进行了访谈。参与者大多是平均年龄50岁,教育程度等于或低于高中的女性。传统和数字文盲参与了这项研究。数据分析采用了以批判理论为基础的反身性主题分析。结果:我们确定了三个相互关联的主题:(1)未能成为数字参与的患者,(2)互联网上的健康信息与个人的素养更能产生共鸣,(3)脆弱性在互联网上受到欢迎。主题探讨了权力动态,似乎是由正式知识、社会文化背景、技术语言的使用以及情感和情感领域的存在所介导的。结论网络健康信息可以促进专业术语的理解,填补医护人员经常忽视的情感鸿沟。研究结果可能有助于卫生专业人员制定将在线卫生信息视为健康接触的一部分的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health and Technology
Health and Technology MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Health and Technology is the first truly cross-disciplinary journal on issues related to health technologies addressing all professions relating to health, care and health technology.The journal constitutes an information platform connecting medical technology and informatics with the needs of care, health care professionals and patients. Thus, medical physicists and biomedical/clinical engineers are encouraged to write articles not only for their colleagues, but directed to all other groups of readers as well, and vice versa.By its nature, the journal presents and discusses hot subjects including but not limited to patient safety, patient empowerment, disease surveillance and management, e-health and issues concerning data security, privacy, reliability and management, data mining and knowledge exchange as well as health prevention. The journal also addresses the medical, financial, social, educational and safety aspects of health technologies as well as health technology assessment and management, including issues such security, efficacy, cost in comparison to the benefit, as well as social, legal and ethical implications.This journal is a communicative source for the health work force (physicians, nurses, medical physicists, clinical engineers, biomedical engineers, hospital engineers, etc.), the ministries of health, hospital management, self-employed doctors, health care providers and regulatory agencies, the medical technology industry, patients'' associations, universities (biomedical and clinical engineering, medical physics, medical informatics, biology, medicine and public health as well as health economics programs), research institutes and professional, scientific and technical organizations.Health and Technology is jointly published by Springer and the IUPESM (International Union for Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine) in cooperation with the World Health Organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信