From Medieval Sacred Art to Modern Photography

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Myrna Nader
{"title":"From Medieval Sacred Art to Modern Photography","authors":"Myrna Nader","doi":"10.1163/15685292-02704007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this study of image-making, it is argued that from the Middle Ages to the Modern period in Lebanon, coexistence between Christians and Muslims, who maintained contact alternately as a minority or dominant culture, was defined by fundamental ideas about sacred art, namely, the embodiment and depiction of the divine. The central premise holds that in Christianity paintings of a religious character are of importance because they reaffirm belief in the doctrine of incarnation, and thus Christ’s humanity. In Islam, by comparison, such art is idolatrous and deserving of censure. The opposite is asserted: God is invisible, and, therefore, paintings of the divine are impermissible. However, denunciation by Islamic scholars was not absolute; there was no disapproval if imagery did not violate Qur’anic proscription against idol-worship. A more nuanced discussion of the Arab literature demonstrates not only Muslim disavowal and episodes of iconoclasm, but also fascination with and commentary on Christian art. Such views informed Christian-Muslim debate over the value and validity of image-making in Modern-era Lebanon, which was further aroused by European developments in the science of optics, based partly on the works of Arab scientists. The advent of photography offered new ways of seeing the world, and discussion among Lebanese Muslim scholars focused on the efficacy and malevolence of optical technology in Arab society and culture. Outright condemnation of image-making was tempered by views condoning certain artistic practices.","PeriodicalId":41383,"journal":{"name":"Religion and the Arts","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685292-02704007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this study of image-making, it is argued that from the Middle Ages to the Modern period in Lebanon, coexistence between Christians and Muslims, who maintained contact alternately as a minority or dominant culture, was defined by fundamental ideas about sacred art, namely, the embodiment and depiction of the divine. The central premise holds that in Christianity paintings of a religious character are of importance because they reaffirm belief in the doctrine of incarnation, and thus Christ’s humanity. In Islam, by comparison, such art is idolatrous and deserving of censure. The opposite is asserted: God is invisible, and, therefore, paintings of the divine are impermissible. However, denunciation by Islamic scholars was not absolute; there was no disapproval if imagery did not violate Qur’anic proscription against idol-worship. A more nuanced discussion of the Arab literature demonstrates not only Muslim disavowal and episodes of iconoclasm, but also fascination with and commentary on Christian art. Such views informed Christian-Muslim debate over the value and validity of image-making in Modern-era Lebanon, which was further aroused by European developments in the science of optics, based partly on the works of Arab scientists. The advent of photography offered new ways of seeing the world, and discussion among Lebanese Muslim scholars focused on the efficacy and malevolence of optical technology in Arab society and culture. Outright condemnation of image-making was tempered by views condoning certain artistic practices.
从中世纪的神圣艺术到现代摄影
本文认为,从中世纪到现代,黎巴嫩的基督教和穆斯林作为少数民族或主流文化交替接触,他们的共存是由神圣艺术的基本理念所决定的,即对神的体现和描绘。其中心前提是,在基督教中,宗教人物的画作很重要,因为它们重申了对化身教义的信仰,从而重申了基督的人性。相比之下,在伊斯兰教中,这样的艺术是偶像崇拜,应该受到谴责。相反的主张是:上帝是看不见的,因此,神的绘画是不允许的。然而,伊斯兰学者的谴责并不是绝对的;如果图像不违反《古兰经》禁止偶像崇拜的规定,就没有人反对。对阿拉伯文学更细致入微的讨论不仅展示了穆斯林的否认和偶像破坏的情节,还展示了对基督教艺术的迷恋和评论。这样的观点引起了基督教和穆斯林对现代黎巴嫩图像制作的价值和有效性的争论,欧洲在光学科学方面的发展进一步激起了这一争论,这在一定程度上是基于阿拉伯科学家的工作。摄影的出现提供了看世界的新方式,黎巴嫩穆斯林学者之间的讨论集中在光学技术在阿拉伯社会和文化中的功效和恶意上。对图像制作的直接谴责被宽恕某些艺术实践的观点所缓和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信