Contamination of Agricultural Soils in Some Baghdad Areas with Antibiotics Resistant Pathogenic Fecal Bacteria

Fatima Dawood, Huda S. A. Al-Hayanni, Maitham A. Sultan
{"title":"Contamination of Agricultural Soils in Some Baghdad Areas with Antibiotics Resistant Pathogenic Fecal Bacteria","authors":"Fatima Dawood, Huda S. A. Al-Hayanni, Maitham A. Sultan","doi":"10.32007/jfacmedbagdad.2104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Early studies have shown that agricultural soil contains various types of microorganisms, especially bacteria, including coliform bacteria (Salmonella, Shigella, Klebsiella, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter) with fecal Gram-positive bacteria like Enterococcus faecalis. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the contamination of Iraqi agricultural soils with pathogenic fecal bacteria (Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis) and study the antibiotic sensitivity patterns of soil-isolated bacteria because it is a dangerous indicator when transmitted to humans. Methods: Soil samples were collected from six locations (farms) in the capital, Baghdad, which were AL-Jadria, AL-Latifia, Diyala River, AL-Jazera, and AL-Zafraniya (block 1 and block 2) during the study period from the end of November 2021 to August 2022; then were compared with the control samples (house garden). These bacteria were isolated by selective culture media and identified using the VITEK® 2 Compact system, and antibiotic sensitivity tests were carried out against 18 different antibiotics by the Kirby Power method. The t-test was used for the statistical analysis. Results: The bacteriological study of agricultural soil showed the presence of fecal bacteria, and this is evidence of contamination of agricultural soil samples with these bacteria. The highest E. coli count was in the AL-Latifia farm (1. 48× 103), while the highest E. faecalis count was in the Diyala River farm (2.63 × 103). The antibiotic sensitivity profile illustrated that E. coli was resistant to ampicillin, ceftriaxone, cefoxitin, piperacillin, ceftazidime, and Teicoplanin but was sensitive to the rest of the antibiotics used, while E. faecalis was only resistant to levofloxacin and linezolid and highly sensitive to the other tested antibiotics. Conclusion: The current study documented the presence of fecal coliform bacteria in studied soil samples, with markedly high resistance rates toward used antibiotics. These facts might be the result of irrigation with sewage water and the use of organic fertilizers Received:March 2023 Accepted: May 2023 Published: Oct. 2023","PeriodicalId":33125,"journal":{"name":"mjl@ kly@ lTb","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mjl@ kly@ lTb","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32007/jfacmedbagdad.2104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early studies have shown that agricultural soil contains various types of microorganisms, especially bacteria, including coliform bacteria (Salmonella, Shigella, Klebsiella, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter) with fecal Gram-positive bacteria like Enterococcus faecalis. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the contamination of Iraqi agricultural soils with pathogenic fecal bacteria (Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis) and study the antibiotic sensitivity patterns of soil-isolated bacteria because it is a dangerous indicator when transmitted to humans. Methods: Soil samples were collected from six locations (farms) in the capital, Baghdad, which were AL-Jadria, AL-Latifia, Diyala River, AL-Jazera, and AL-Zafraniya (block 1 and block 2) during the study period from the end of November 2021 to August 2022; then were compared with the control samples (house garden). These bacteria were isolated by selective culture media and identified using the VITEK® 2 Compact system, and antibiotic sensitivity tests were carried out against 18 different antibiotics by the Kirby Power method. The t-test was used for the statistical analysis. Results: The bacteriological study of agricultural soil showed the presence of fecal bacteria, and this is evidence of contamination of agricultural soil samples with these bacteria. The highest E. coli count was in the AL-Latifia farm (1. 48× 103), while the highest E. faecalis count was in the Diyala River farm (2.63 × 103). The antibiotic sensitivity profile illustrated that E. coli was resistant to ampicillin, ceftriaxone, cefoxitin, piperacillin, ceftazidime, and Teicoplanin but was sensitive to the rest of the antibiotics used, while E. faecalis was only resistant to levofloxacin and linezolid and highly sensitive to the other tested antibiotics. Conclusion: The current study documented the presence of fecal coliform bacteria in studied soil samples, with markedly high resistance rates toward used antibiotics. These facts might be the result of irrigation with sewage water and the use of organic fertilizers Received:March 2023 Accepted: May 2023 Published: Oct. 2023
巴格达部分地区农业土壤中抗生素耐药致病性粪便细菌的污染
背景:早期研究表明,农业土壤中含有各种类型的微生物,特别是细菌,包括大肠菌群(沙门氏菌、志贺氏菌、克雷伯氏菌、大肠杆菌和肠杆菌)和粪肠球菌等粪便革兰氏阳性菌。因此,本研究旨在调查伊拉克农业土壤中致病性粪便细菌(大肠杆菌和粪肠球菌)的污染情况,并研究土壤分离细菌的抗生素敏感性模式,因为它在传播给人类时是一种危险的指标。方法:在2021年11月底至2022年8月的研究期间,从首都巴格达的AL-Jadria、AL-Latifia、Diyala River、AL-Jazera和AL-Zafraniya(1区和2区)6个地点(农场)采集土壤样本;然后与对照样本(室内花园)进行比较。这些细菌通过选择性培养基分离,使用VITEK®2 Compact系统进行鉴定,并通过Kirby Power法对18种不同抗生素进行抗生素敏感性试验。采用t检验进行统计分析。结果:农业土壤的细菌学研究表明粪便细菌的存在,这是农业土壤样品被这些细菌污染的证据。大肠杆菌数量最高的是AL-Latifia农场(1。粪肠球菌数最高的养殖场为迪亚拉河养殖场(2.63 × 103)。抗生素敏感性分析表明,大肠杆菌对氨苄西林、头孢曲松、头孢西丁、哌拉西林、头孢他啶和替柯普兰耐药,但对其余抗生素敏感,而粪肠杆菌仅对左氧氟沙星和利奈唑胺耐药,对其他抗生素高度敏感。结论:目前的研究表明,在所研究的土壤样本中存在粪便大肠菌群,对使用过的抗生素具有明显的高耐药率。这些事实可能是用污水灌溉和使用有机肥的结果。收稿日期:2023年3月接受日期:2023年5月发表日期:2023年10月
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信