{"title":"Origen of Alexandria and Human Dignity","authors":"John Solheid","doi":"10.1515/zac-2023-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, I respond to a recent article published in the Journal of Theological Studies , in which Matthijs den Dulk challenged a prevailing idea that Origen of Alexandria was a proponent of human dignity. Den Dulk takes a different approach by drawing attention to the language of race and ethnicity Origen used to contrast Christianity with other racial groups. Den Dulk argues that, rather than being a champion of human dignity, Origen provided a basis from which modern racist discourse emerged. I will count den Dulk’s argument and demonstrate 1.) how den Dulk fails to take into proper account the theological dimensions of Origen’s thought in the passages den Dulk selected to make his argument; and 2.) that Origen’s complementary notions of the human being created in the image of God and human freedom provide a framework from which we can develop a theology of human dignity in response to modern racist discourses.","PeriodicalId":42516,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANTIKES CHRISTENTUM-JOURNAL OF ANCIENT CHRISTIANITY","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANTIKES CHRISTENTUM-JOURNAL OF ANCIENT CHRISTIANITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zac-2023-0011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, I respond to a recent article published in the Journal of Theological Studies , in which Matthijs den Dulk challenged a prevailing idea that Origen of Alexandria was a proponent of human dignity. Den Dulk takes a different approach by drawing attention to the language of race and ethnicity Origen used to contrast Christianity with other racial groups. Den Dulk argues that, rather than being a champion of human dignity, Origen provided a basis from which modern racist discourse emerged. I will count den Dulk’s argument and demonstrate 1.) how den Dulk fails to take into proper account the theological dimensions of Origen’s thought in the passages den Dulk selected to make his argument; and 2.) that Origen’s complementary notions of the human being created in the image of God and human freedom provide a framework from which we can develop a theology of human dignity in response to modern racist discourses.
在本文中,我回应了最近发表在《神学研究杂志》上的一篇文章,在这篇文章中,Matthijs den Dulk挑战了一种流行的观点,即亚历山大的奥利金是人类尊严的支持者。Den Dulk采用了一种不同的方法,他将人们的注意力吸引到奥利金用来将基督教与其他种族群体进行对比的种族和民族语言上。Den Dulk认为,奥利金不是人类尊严的捍卫者,而是为现代种族主义话语的出现提供了基础。我将列举登杜尔克的论点并论证1)登杜尔克是如何在登杜尔克选择的段落中没有适当考虑到奥利金思想的神学维度的;2)奥利金关于人类是按照上帝的形象和人类自由创造的互补概念,为我们提供了一个框架,从中我们可以发展出一种关于人类尊严的神学,以回应现代种族主义话语。
期刊介绍:
The Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum / Journal of Ancient Christianity (ZAC) is a refereed academic journal which aims at encouraging the dialogue between scholars of church history, history of religion, and classical antiquity with all its subdisciplines (classical and Christian Near Eastern philology, ancient history, classical and Christian archaeology, as well as the history of ancient philosophy and religion). In this context, ancient Christianity is understood in its complete prosopographic and doxographic breadth, with special emphasis on the influences of peripheral groups and related movements.