Eighteenth-Century Literary Fragments: Queering the Fiction of “Finished” Work

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Lucien Darjeun Meadows, Leia Lynn
{"title":"Eighteenth-Century Literary Fragments: Queering the Fiction of “Finished” Work","authors":"Lucien Darjeun Meadows, Leia Lynn","doi":"10.3138/ecf.35.4.513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most accepted fictions in literature is that a work will, at some point in its existence, be completed. In this essay, we queer that assumption, challenging its tenets through examining taxonomies and eighteenth-century categorizations alongside Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “Kubla Khan” (1797; published 1816), John Keats’s Hyperion (1820), and Mary Wollstonecraft’s Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman (1798), as well as other unfinished literary works of the long eighteenth century. We argue for the rereading of fragmented and unfinished work as a method of pluriversality and refusal of a singular, monumental, fixed and finished text. By accepting that the finished/unfinished binary of work is not true to creative processes, we refuse the fiction of finished work and argue to elevate those myriad fragmentary works that are currently considered critically inferior.","PeriodicalId":43800,"journal":{"name":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.35.4.513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most accepted fictions in literature is that a work will, at some point in its existence, be completed. In this essay, we queer that assumption, challenging its tenets through examining taxonomies and eighteenth-century categorizations alongside Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “Kubla Khan” (1797; published 1816), John Keats’s Hyperion (1820), and Mary Wollstonecraft’s Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman (1798), as well as other unfinished literary works of the long eighteenth century. We argue for the rereading of fragmented and unfinished work as a method of pluriversality and refusal of a singular, monumental, fixed and finished text. By accepting that the finished/unfinished binary of work is not true to creative processes, we refuse the fiction of finished work and argue to elevate those myriad fragmentary works that are currently considered critically inferior.
18世纪的文学碎片:对“已完成”作品的幻想
文学作品中最广为接受的一个虚构故事是,一部作品将在其存在的某个时刻被完成。在这篇文章中,我们对这一假设提出了质疑,通过研究分类法和18世纪的分类,以及塞缪尔·泰勒·柯勒律治的《忽必烈汗》(1797;出版于1816年),约翰·济慈的《亥伯龙》(1820年),玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特的《玛利亚:或者,女人的错误》(1798年),以及其他在漫长的18世纪未完成的文学作品。我们主张重读碎片化和未完成的作品,作为一种多元化和拒绝单一的、不朽的、固定的和完成的文本的方法。通过接受已完成/未完成的二元作品不符合创作过程,我们拒绝已完成作品的虚构,并主张提升那些目前被认为是低劣的无数零碎作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信