{"title":"Words like Fire: Prophecy and Apocalypse in Apollinaire, Marinetti, and Pound by James P. Leveque (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Words like Fire: Prophecy and Apocalypse in Apollinaire, Marinetti, and Pound by James P. Leveque Willard Bohn Words like Fire: Prophecy and Apocalypse in Apollinaire, Marinetti, and Pound. By James P. Leveque. (Studies in Comparative Literature, 50) Cambridge: Legenda. 2021. x+ 221 pp. £85. ISBN 978–1–78188–443–0. This book is a welcome contribution to avant-garde studies in Europe and North America. Devoted primarily to poetry, it examines the early literary activities of three giants who helped shape our response to the twentieth century: Guillaume Apollinaire in France, F. T. Marinetti in Italy, and Ezra Pound in England and America. To my knowledge, this is the only book-length study of all three poets, each of whom—officially or unofficially—headed a major literary movement. Associated with Cubism, Futurism, and Imagism respectively, they strove to create a revolutionary poetry that reflected the values of the modern age. Unlike the Italian leader, who was the official head of the Futurist movement, the other two led largely by example, juxtaposing their revolutionary poems with articles defending the poetics in question. Alternating between prophecy and apocalypse (or combining the two), as James P. Leveque demonstrates, they drew on biblical literature to establish various religious parallels. In particular, the author claims, apocalyptic attitudes and prophetic poses were used by all three men 'to establish poetry as the authoritative voice on the meaning of [the First World War] and the potential for the post-war future' (p. 18). [End Page 587] The following three chapters consider the role played by prophecy in the poets' early works, which in Apollinaire's case was far from negligible. As Leveque is not the first to point out, the French author frequently refers to personages and themes in the Bible. Published in 1966, Robert Couffignal's L'Inspiration biblique dans l'œuvre de Guillaume Apollinaire (Paris: Lettres Modernes) has been a valuable reference for many years. However, since Leveque's biblical knowledge is much more exhaustive, he is able to paint a more detailed portrait of the poet's indebtedness. The prophetic bent of Marinetti's works is not as evident as Apollinaire's because it assumes a different form. Arguing that the Futurist leader considered his writings to be a form of prophecy, the author focuses on Le Monoplan du pape (The Pope's Monoplane) and several Futurist manifestos. In his opinion, the latter represent 'perhaps the modern prophetic mode par excellence' (p. 64). Marinettti hoped to become a modern Joshua, he explains, leading the Italian people into the conquest of a Promised Land. In a similar manner, Pound also viewed himself as a poet and something of a prophet. Unlike the previous leaders' works, which tended to be optimistic, his own were marked by pessimism and a profound sense of loss. Since he believed that modern poetry was vastly inferior to traditional poetry, his works were filled with bitter satire and social criticism. Tn just this way', Leveque observes, 'do prophets acquire their authority to judge the world' (p. 105). Paralleling the previous section, the next three chapters examine the thematic role of the biblical apocalypse in all three poets' works. Defining the concept as 'a cataclysm with meaning', David G. Bromley insists that its ultimate purpose is not destruction but creation (p. 119, referring to 'Constructing Apocalypticism: Social and Cultural Elements of Radical Organization', in Millennium, Messiahs, and Mayhem: Contemporary Apocalyptic Movements, ed. by Thomas Robbins and Susan J. Palmer (Routledge: New York, 1997), pp. 31–46 (p. 35)). Considering each of the three leaders in turn, Leveque begins by noting that Apollinaire's poems were directed towards three distinct audiences: his avant-garde colleagues, the citizens of several European countries, and his fellow soldiers in the First World War. Although these three groups called for different strategies, his poetry constantly poses questions about individual identity and its relation to society. In particular, as the author demonstrates, the war prompted Apollinaire to imagine a brand new world, one in which the contradictions and binary structures of ordinary life would be absorbed into each other in a single apocalyptic moment. Devoted to Marinetti, the next chapter concentrates on Futurist theatrical...","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907842","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reviewed by: Words like Fire: Prophecy and Apocalypse in Apollinaire, Marinetti, and Pound by James P. Leveque Willard Bohn Words like Fire: Prophecy and Apocalypse in Apollinaire, Marinetti, and Pound. By James P. Leveque. (Studies in Comparative Literature, 50) Cambridge: Legenda. 2021. x+ 221 pp. £85. ISBN 978–1–78188–443–0. This book is a welcome contribution to avant-garde studies in Europe and North America. Devoted primarily to poetry, it examines the early literary activities of three giants who helped shape our response to the twentieth century: Guillaume Apollinaire in France, F. T. Marinetti in Italy, and Ezra Pound in England and America. To my knowledge, this is the only book-length study of all three poets, each of whom—officially or unofficially—headed a major literary movement. Associated with Cubism, Futurism, and Imagism respectively, they strove to create a revolutionary poetry that reflected the values of the modern age. Unlike the Italian leader, who was the official head of the Futurist movement, the other two led largely by example, juxtaposing their revolutionary poems with articles defending the poetics in question. Alternating between prophecy and apocalypse (or combining the two), as James P. Leveque demonstrates, they drew on biblical literature to establish various religious parallels. In particular, the author claims, apocalyptic attitudes and prophetic poses were used by all three men 'to establish poetry as the authoritative voice on the meaning of [the First World War] and the potential for the post-war future' (p. 18). [End Page 587] The following three chapters consider the role played by prophecy in the poets' early works, which in Apollinaire's case was far from negligible. As Leveque is not the first to point out, the French author frequently refers to personages and themes in the Bible. Published in 1966, Robert Couffignal's L'Inspiration biblique dans l'œuvre de Guillaume Apollinaire (Paris: Lettres Modernes) has been a valuable reference for many years. However, since Leveque's biblical knowledge is much more exhaustive, he is able to paint a more detailed portrait of the poet's indebtedness. The prophetic bent of Marinetti's works is not as evident as Apollinaire's because it assumes a different form. Arguing that the Futurist leader considered his writings to be a form of prophecy, the author focuses on Le Monoplan du pape (The Pope's Monoplane) and several Futurist manifestos. In his opinion, the latter represent 'perhaps the modern prophetic mode par excellence' (p. 64). Marinettti hoped to become a modern Joshua, he explains, leading the Italian people into the conquest of a Promised Land. In a similar manner, Pound also viewed himself as a poet and something of a prophet. Unlike the previous leaders' works, which tended to be optimistic, his own were marked by pessimism and a profound sense of loss. Since he believed that modern poetry was vastly inferior to traditional poetry, his works were filled with bitter satire and social criticism. Tn just this way', Leveque observes, 'do prophets acquire their authority to judge the world' (p. 105). Paralleling the previous section, the next three chapters examine the thematic role of the biblical apocalypse in all three poets' works. Defining the concept as 'a cataclysm with meaning', David G. Bromley insists that its ultimate purpose is not destruction but creation (p. 119, referring to 'Constructing Apocalypticism: Social and Cultural Elements of Radical Organization', in Millennium, Messiahs, and Mayhem: Contemporary Apocalyptic Movements, ed. by Thomas Robbins and Susan J. Palmer (Routledge: New York, 1997), pp. 31–46 (p. 35)). Considering each of the three leaders in turn, Leveque begins by noting that Apollinaire's poems were directed towards three distinct audiences: his avant-garde colleagues, the citizens of several European countries, and his fellow soldiers in the First World War. Although these three groups called for different strategies, his poetry constantly poses questions about individual identity and its relation to society. In particular, as the author demonstrates, the war prompted Apollinaire to imagine a brand new world, one in which the contradictions and binary structures of ordinary life would be absorbed into each other in a single apocalyptic moment. Devoted to Marinetti, the next chapter concentrates on Futurist theatrical...
评:《阿波利奈尔、马里内蒂和庞德》中的《火:预言和启示》作者:詹姆斯·p·莱维克·威拉德·波恩《阿波利奈尔、马里内蒂和庞德》中的《火:预言和启示》詹姆斯·p·莱维克著。(《比较文学研究》第50期)剑桥:Legenda出版社,2021。X + 221页,85英镑。ISBN 978-1-78188-443-0。这本书对欧洲和北美的先锋派研究作出了值得欢迎的贡献。这本书主要以诗歌为主题,考察了三位帮助我们对20世纪做出回应的文学巨擘的早期文学活动:法国的纪尧姆·阿波利奈尔、意大利的f·t·马里内蒂和英美的埃兹拉·庞德。据我所知,这是对这三位诗人的唯一一本书长度的研究,他们每个人——无论是正式的还是非正式的——都领导了一场主要的文学运动。他们分别与立体主义、未来主义和意象主义相结合,力图创造反映现代价值的革命性诗歌。这位意大利领导人是未来主义运动的正式领袖,而另外两位则主要是以身作则,将他们的革命诗歌与捍卫所讨论的诗学的文章并列在一起。正如詹姆斯·p·莱维克(James P. Leveque)所展示的那样,他们交替使用预言和天启(或将两者结合起来),利用圣经文学来建立各种宗教的相似之处。特别是,作者声称,这三个人都使用了启示录的态度和预言的姿势,“将诗歌确立为(第一次世界大战)意义和战后未来潜力的权威声音”(第18页)。接下来的三章讨论了预言在诗人早期作品中所扮演的角色,在阿波利奈尔的作品中,预言的作用不容忽视。正如Leveque不是第一个指出的那样,这位法国作家经常提到圣经中的人物和主题。1966年出版的Robert Couffignal的《L' inspiration biblique dans L' œuvre de Guillaume Apollinaire》(巴黎:letters moderes)多年来一直是一本有价值的参考资料。然而,由于Leveque的圣经知识更加详尽,他能够更详细地描绘诗人的债务。马里内蒂作品的预言倾向不像阿波利奈尔的作品那样明显,因为它采用了不同的形式。作者认为,这位未来主义领袖认为他的作品是一种预言,他把重点放在了《教皇的单翼飞机》(Le Monoplan du pape)和几份未来主义宣言上。在他看来,后者代表了“也许是现代最杰出的预言模式”(第64页)。马里内蒂解释说,他希望成为现代的约书亚,带领意大利人民征服应许之地。同样,庞德也认为自己是一个诗人和某种程度上的先知。与前几任领导人倾向于乐观主义的作品不同,他自己的作品带有悲观主义和深刻的失落感。由于他认为现代诗歌远不如传统诗歌,他的作品充满了辛辣的讽刺和社会批评。Leveque观察到,“正是通过这种方式,先知才获得了审判世界的权威”(第105页)。与前一节平行,接下来的三章考察了圣经启示在三位诗人作品中的主题作用。大卫·g·布罗姆利(David G. Bromley)将这一概念定义为“有意义的大灾难”,坚持认为其最终目的不是毁灭,而是创造(第119页,参考“构建启示录:激进组织的社会和文化因素”,见托马斯·罗宾斯和苏珊·j·帕尔默主编的《千禧年、弥赛亚和混乱:当代启示录运动》(Routledge:纽约,1997),第31-46页(第35页))。依次考虑这三位领袖,Leveque首先注意到阿波利奈尔的诗歌是针对三种不同的受众:他的先锋派同事,几个欧洲国家的公民,以及他在第一次世界大战中的战友。虽然这三个群体需要不同的策略,但他的诗歌不断提出关于个人身份及其与社会关系的问题。特别是,正如作者所展示的,战争促使阿波利奈尔想象一个全新的世界,在这个世界里,日常生活的矛盾和二元结构将在一个世界末日的时刻相互融合。下一章专注于马里内蒂,专注于未来主义戏剧……
期刊介绍:
With an unbroken publication record since 1905, its 1248 pages are divided between articles, predominantly on medieval and modern literature, in the languages of continental Europe, together with English (including the United States and the Commonwealth), Francophone Africa and Canada, and Latin America. In addition, MLR reviews over five hundred books each year The MLR Supplement The Modern Language Review was founded in 1905 and has included well over 3,000 articles and some 20,000 book reviews. This supplement to Volume 100 is published by the Modern Humanities Research Association in celebration of the centenary of its flagship journal.