Evaluation of the Implementation of Contract Change Order as A Solution to the Problem of Contract Scope Changes

Bintang Putra Nusantara, Sutardi Sutardi
{"title":"Evaluation of the Implementation of Contract Change Order as A Solution to the Problem of Contract Scope Changes","authors":"Bintang Putra Nusantara, Sutardi Sutardi","doi":"10.28932/jts.v19i2.4508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction industry activities are increasing. Construction industry players need to be prepared to face the possibility of changes of design planed that are not in accordance with field conditions. The purpose of this research is to identify, analyze the causes and impacts of Contract Change Orders (CCO) at the pre-construction, construction implementation, and post-construction stages with case study is Proyek Simpang Susun Balaraja Timur at Tol Jakarta – Merak, Kabupaten Tangerang. The research method used is descriptive and qualitative methods by conducting Earned Value Analysis and Fishbone Analysis to identify the causal factors and impacts of CCO so that efforts can be made to mitigate the performance of the construction contract from the aspect of quality, cost, and time. The results of the analysis show 3 factors causing CCO namely consultant factors, such as lack of planning preparation and non-compliance with field conditions, project owner factors, and contractor factors. The results of Earned Value Analysis with Estimate at Completion (EAC) calculations can be used to identify the need for additional contract value and additional execution time. On initial contract identification: Cost Performance Index (CPI) is 0.77 (insufficient costs with cost overrun – Rp. 52.502,111,631.83) and Schedule Performance Index (SPI) 1.21, means that Addendum 1 needs to be done with the results: CPI is 1.17 (the costs used are sufficient from the available fees), EAC is Rp. 189,848,751,106.02 with changes in the contract value is Rp. 222,017,999,900.65, SPI is 1.21 from the initial contract value Rp. 174,437,684,167.96","PeriodicalId":52838,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknik Sipil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknik Sipil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28932/jts.v19i2.4508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction industry activities are increasing. Construction industry players need to be prepared to face the possibility of changes of design planed that are not in accordance with field conditions. The purpose of this research is to identify, analyze the causes and impacts of Contract Change Orders (CCO) at the pre-construction, construction implementation, and post-construction stages with case study is Proyek Simpang Susun Balaraja Timur at Tol Jakarta – Merak, Kabupaten Tangerang. The research method used is descriptive and qualitative methods by conducting Earned Value Analysis and Fishbone Analysis to identify the causal factors and impacts of CCO so that efforts can be made to mitigate the performance of the construction contract from the aspect of quality, cost, and time. The results of the analysis show 3 factors causing CCO namely consultant factors, such as lack of planning preparation and non-compliance with field conditions, project owner factors, and contractor factors. The results of Earned Value Analysis with Estimate at Completion (EAC) calculations can be used to identify the need for additional contract value and additional execution time. On initial contract identification: Cost Performance Index (CPI) is 0.77 (insufficient costs with cost overrun – Rp. 52.502,111,631.83) and Schedule Performance Index (SPI) 1.21, means that Addendum 1 needs to be done with the results: CPI is 1.17 (the costs used are sufficient from the available fees), EAC is Rp. 189,848,751,106.02 with changes in the contract value is Rp. 222,017,999,900.65, SPI is 1.21 from the initial contract value Rp. 174,437,684,167.96
解决合同范围变更问题的合同变更令实施评价
建造业的活动正在增加。建筑行业的参与者需要准备好面对不符合现场条件的设计计划变更的可能性。本研究的目的是识别,分析合同变更令(CCO)在施工前,施工实施和施工后阶段的原因和影响,案例研究是Proyek Simpang Susun Balaraja Timur在Tol Jakarta - Merak, Kabupaten Tangerang。研究方法采用描述性和定性相结合的方法,通过挣值分析和鱼骨分析来确定CCO的原因和影响,从而从质量、成本和时间三个方面减轻施工合同的绩效。分析结果显示造成CCO的3个因素,即顾问因素,如缺乏规划准备和不符合现场条件,项目业主因素和承包商因素。完成估算的挣值分析(EAC)计算结果可用于确定是否需要额外的合同价值和额外的执行时间。在初始合同标识:成本绩效指数(CPI)是0.77(成本与成本超支不足- Rp。52.502,111,631.83)和进度性能指数(SPI) 1.21,意味着需要做附录1的结果:CPI是1.17(从可用足够使用的成本费用),EAC Rp。189848751106 .02点与合同的变化值是Rp。222017999900 .65点,SPI从最初的合同金额是1.21卢比,174437684167 .96点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信