Effects of Direct and Indirect Factors on Attitude toward the COVID-19 Vaccine in Pregnant Women

Q2 Nursing
Dora Samaria, Desmawati Desmawati, Lima Florensia
{"title":"Effects of Direct and Indirect Factors on Attitude toward the COVID-19 Vaccine in Pregnant Women","authors":"Dora Samaria, Desmawati Desmawati, Lima Florensia","doi":"10.14710/nmjn.v13i2.51935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The administration of the COVID-19 vaccine is facing resistance from pregnant women, leading to a lower attitude toward vaccination uptake. Previous studies have explored several factors that contributed to the issue. However, no studies have investigated further the direct and indirect effects of factors that simultaneously influence attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the direct and indirect effects of factors that influence attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine (ACV) in pregnant women, particularly hesitancy, motivation, and history of COVID-19 infection (HCI), and to describe a pathway model that represents the effects.Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 440 pregnant women living in Bekasi and Pandeglang, Indonesia, in May–June 2022 using consecutive sampling methods. This study employed the Motivations of Vaccination Questionnaire, the Reasons for Hesitation Questionnaire, and the Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccine Questionnaire. A path analysis was performed to calculate the data.Results: Hesitancy had a more indirect effect (β=-0.270; p=0.00) than the direct effect (β=-0.193; p=0.00) on ACV, whereas motivation had a more direct effect (β=0.092; p=0.04) than the indirect effect (β=0.074; p=0.00). HCI acted as the mediation variable because it could intercede with the effect of hesitancy on ACV (β=-0.449; p=0.00). It indicated that HCI in pregnant women would lead to a different approach to increasing ACV.Conclusions: All studied factors had significant impacts on ACV, both directly and indirectly. It is recommended that interventions be adjusted according to the program’s purpose, with the aim of increasing motivation or reducing hesitancy.","PeriodicalId":36409,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Media Journal of Nursing","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Media Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v13i2.51935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The administration of the COVID-19 vaccine is facing resistance from pregnant women, leading to a lower attitude toward vaccination uptake. Previous studies have explored several factors that contributed to the issue. However, no studies have investigated further the direct and indirect effects of factors that simultaneously influence attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the direct and indirect effects of factors that influence attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine (ACV) in pregnant women, particularly hesitancy, motivation, and history of COVID-19 infection (HCI), and to describe a pathway model that represents the effects.Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 440 pregnant women living in Bekasi and Pandeglang, Indonesia, in May–June 2022 using consecutive sampling methods. This study employed the Motivations of Vaccination Questionnaire, the Reasons for Hesitation Questionnaire, and the Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccine Questionnaire. A path analysis was performed to calculate the data.Results: Hesitancy had a more indirect effect (β=-0.270; p=0.00) than the direct effect (β=-0.193; p=0.00) on ACV, whereas motivation had a more direct effect (β=0.092; p=0.04) than the indirect effect (β=0.074; p=0.00). HCI acted as the mediation variable because it could intercede with the effect of hesitancy on ACV (β=-0.449; p=0.00). It indicated that HCI in pregnant women would lead to a different approach to increasing ACV.Conclusions: All studied factors had significant impacts on ACV, both directly and indirectly. It is recommended that interventions be adjusted according to the program’s purpose, with the aim of increasing motivation or reducing hesitancy.
直接和间接因素对孕妇COVID-19疫苗接种态度的影响
背景:COVID-19疫苗接种面临来自孕妇的抵制,导致接种态度较低。之前的研究已经探索了导致这一问题的几个因素。然而,没有研究进一步调查同时影响孕妇对COVID-19疫苗态度的因素的直接和间接影响。目的:本研究旨在探讨影响孕妇对COVID-19疫苗(ACV)态度的因素,特别是犹豫、动机和COVID-19感染史(HCI)的直接和间接影响,并描述一个代表影响的途径模型。方法:本横断面研究于2022年5 - 6月采用连续抽样方法,在印度尼西亚别加西和攀德朗招募440名孕妇。本研究采用《接种动机问卷》、《犹豫原因问卷》和《对新冠肺炎疫苗的态度问卷》。进行通径分析来计算数据。结果:犹豫的间接影响更大(β=-0.270;P =0.00)大于直接效应(β=-0.193;p=0.00),而动机对ACV有更直接的影响(β=0.092;P =0.04)大于间接效应(β=0.074;p = 0.00)。HCI可以作为中介变量,因为它可以调解犹豫对ACV的影响(β=-0.449;p = 0.00)。这表明孕妇的HCI将导致不同的方法来增加ACV。结论:各因素对ACV均有直接和间接影响。建议根据项目的目的调整干预措施,目的是增加动机或减少犹豫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信