Our experience with mitral valve repair using an autologous pericardium for recurrent mitral regurgitation

Q4 Medicine
S. A. Zhurko, K. M. Aminov, A. B. O. Gamzaev, S. A. Fedorov, D. I. Lashmanov
{"title":"Our experience with mitral valve repair using an autologous pericardium for recurrent mitral regurgitation","authors":"S. A. Zhurko, K. M. Aminov, A. B. O. Gamzaev, S. A. Fedorov, D. I. Lashmanov","doi":"10.35401/2541-9897-2023-26-2-87-92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To present outcomes of mitral valve reinterventions for recurrent degenerative mitral regurgitation. Materials and methods: From May 2017 to February 2021 3 male patients aged 43, 50, and 54 years and an 18-year-old female patient underwent mitral valve reinterventions with an autopericardial strip at Scientific Research Institute – Specialized Cardiac Surgery Clinical Hospital named after Academician B.A. Korolev. Three patients had primary mitral valve annuloplasty using a support ring and 1 patient using an autopericardial strip. In this patient group recurrent mitral regurgitation developed within 6-33 months between the primary repair and reintervention (20 ± 13.5 months on average). Results: No hospital mortality was reported. Cardiopulmonary bypass duration averaged 109.8 ± 19.7 minutes, and myocardial ischemia lasted 77.5 ± 10.1 minutes. Two patients had an adjunctive repeat radiofrequency Maze procedure, with the supraventricular rhythm restored in 1 patient. Echocardiography demonstrated that mitral regurgitation did not exceed grade 1 at discharge. Reintervention using an autopericardial strip for recurrent mitral regurgitation significantly reduces sizes of the left atrium and left ventricle. Ejection fraction did not change after the intervention. Mitral valve peak gradient in all cases did not exceed 9 mm Hg. Conclusions: The key to a successful mitral valve reintervention is a qualitative analysis of the recurrence causes and use of various techniques and materials for intervention on the mitral valvular complex. Mitral valve reinterventions, especially in young patients, are justified if certain safety conditions are met and have similar outcomes to primary interventions.","PeriodicalId":34355,"journal":{"name":"Innovatsionnaia meditsina Kubani","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovatsionnaia meditsina Kubani","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2023-26-2-87-92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To present outcomes of mitral valve reinterventions for recurrent degenerative mitral regurgitation. Materials and methods: From May 2017 to February 2021 3 male patients aged 43, 50, and 54 years and an 18-year-old female patient underwent mitral valve reinterventions with an autopericardial strip at Scientific Research Institute – Specialized Cardiac Surgery Clinical Hospital named after Academician B.A. Korolev. Three patients had primary mitral valve annuloplasty using a support ring and 1 patient using an autopericardial strip. In this patient group recurrent mitral regurgitation developed within 6-33 months between the primary repair and reintervention (20 ± 13.5 months on average). Results: No hospital mortality was reported. Cardiopulmonary bypass duration averaged 109.8 ± 19.7 minutes, and myocardial ischemia lasted 77.5 ± 10.1 minutes. Two patients had an adjunctive repeat radiofrequency Maze procedure, with the supraventricular rhythm restored in 1 patient. Echocardiography demonstrated that mitral regurgitation did not exceed grade 1 at discharge. Reintervention using an autopericardial strip for recurrent mitral regurgitation significantly reduces sizes of the left atrium and left ventricle. Ejection fraction did not change after the intervention. Mitral valve peak gradient in all cases did not exceed 9 mm Hg. Conclusions: The key to a successful mitral valve reintervention is a qualitative analysis of the recurrence causes and use of various techniques and materials for intervention on the mitral valvular complex. Mitral valve reinterventions, especially in young patients, are justified if certain safety conditions are met and have similar outcomes to primary interventions.
自体心包修复复发性二尖瓣返流的经验
目的:探讨二尖瓣再介入治疗复发性退行性二尖瓣反流的效果。材料与方法:2017年5月至2021年2月,3名年龄分别为43岁、50岁和54岁的男性患者和1名18岁的女性患者在以ba . Korolev院士命名的科学研究所心脏外科专业临床医院行二尖瓣再介入手术。3例患者使用支撑环进行初级二尖瓣成形术,1例患者使用自心包条。本组患者在初次修复和再次介入手术之间的6-33个月内(平均20±13.5个月)再次发生二尖瓣返流。结果:无住院死亡报告。体外循环时间平均109.8±19.7分钟,心肌缺血时间平均77.5±10.1分钟。2例患者辅助重复射频迷宫手术,1例患者室上节律恢复。超声心动图显示二尖瓣返流在出院时未超过1级。复发性二尖瓣返流再介入心包自贴可显著减小左心房和左心室的大小。射血分数在干预后没有改变。结论:对二尖瓣复合体的复发原因进行定性分析,采用各种技术和材料进行二尖瓣复合体的介入治疗,是二尖瓣再介入成功的关键。二尖瓣再干预,特别是在年轻患者中,如果满足某些安全条件并具有与初次干预相似的结果,则是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovatsionnaia meditsina Kubani
Innovatsionnaia meditsina Kubani Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信