Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement for the degenerated rapid deployment PercevalTM prosthesis: technical considerations

Christophe Dubois, Lennert Minten, Marie Lamberigts, Pierluigi Lesizza, Steven Jacobs, Tom Adriaenssens, Peter Verbrugghe, Bart Meuris
{"title":"Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement for the degenerated rapid deployment PercevalTM prosthesis: technical considerations","authors":"Christophe Dubois, Lennert Minten, Marie Lamberigts, Pierluigi Lesizza, Steven Jacobs, Tom Adriaenssens, Peter Verbrugghe, Bart Meuris","doi":"10.21037/jovs-23-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Rapid deployment aortic valve prostheses or “sutureless valves” (SV) present a favorable hemodynamic and clinical safety profile but remain sensitive to structural valve degeneration (SVD) leading to valve dysfunction. In patients with SVD, valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) has become the preferred approach because of its high procedural success rate and the inherent risk of redo-surgery in an often-elderly population. However, careful consideration of anatomical characteristics and features of the surgical prosthesis is needed to assess feasibility of the ViV procedure, including meticulous attention to avoid coronary obstruction, device malpositioning, and high residual transprosthetic gradients. We systematically describe technical considerations for the transcatheter treatment of failing PercevalTM SV. By design, PercevalTM has the potential to serve as an ideal docking station for a transcatheter ViV procedure, offering a clearly visible radiopaque frame, circumferential expansion capabilities, and a low risk of coronary obstruction and sinus sequestration. We describe procedural tips and tricks and provide our own case experience. In a series of 784 PercevalTM implants, incidence rate of severe SVD was 0.54% per patient year (15 patients), of which only 9 were scheduled for and underwent successful ViV TAVR. Treatment resulted in all patients in clinical improvement and significant reduction of transprosthetic gradients and no residual aortic valve regurgitation.","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"168 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of visualized surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs-23-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Rapid deployment aortic valve prostheses or “sutureless valves” (SV) present a favorable hemodynamic and clinical safety profile but remain sensitive to structural valve degeneration (SVD) leading to valve dysfunction. In patients with SVD, valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) has become the preferred approach because of its high procedural success rate and the inherent risk of redo-surgery in an often-elderly population. However, careful consideration of anatomical characteristics and features of the surgical prosthesis is needed to assess feasibility of the ViV procedure, including meticulous attention to avoid coronary obstruction, device malpositioning, and high residual transprosthetic gradients. We systematically describe technical considerations for the transcatheter treatment of failing PercevalTM SV. By design, PercevalTM has the potential to serve as an ideal docking station for a transcatheter ViV procedure, offering a clearly visible radiopaque frame, circumferential expansion capabilities, and a low risk of coronary obstruction and sinus sequestration. We describe procedural tips and tricks and provide our own case experience. In a series of 784 PercevalTM implants, incidence rate of severe SVD was 0.54% per patient year (15 patients), of which only 9 were scheduled for and underwent successful ViV TAVR. Treatment resulted in all patients in clinical improvement and significant reduction of transprosthetic gradients and no residual aortic valve regurgitation.
经导管瓣中瓣主动脉瓣置换术治疗退化性快速部署PercevalTM假体:技术考虑
快速部署主动脉瓣假体或“无缝线瓣膜”(SV)具有良好的血流动力学和临床安全性,但对结构性瓣膜变性(SVD)导致瓣膜功能障碍仍然敏感。对于SVD患者,经导管瓣内主动脉瓣置换术(ViV - TAVR)已成为首选的方法,因为它的手术成功率高,并且通常在老年人中存在再手术的固有风险。然而,需要仔细考虑手术假体的解剖特征和特点来评估ViV手术的可行性,包括仔细注意避免冠状动脉阻塞、装置错位和高残留假体梯度。我们系统地描述了经导管治疗失败的perevaltm SV的技术考虑。通过设计,PercevalTM有可能成为经导管ViV手术的理想对接站,提供清晰可见的不透射线框架,周向扩张能力,以及低风险的冠状动脉阻塞和窦性隔离。我们描述了程序技巧和技巧,并提供了我们自己的案例经验。在一系列784例PercevalTM植入物中,严重SVD的发生率为0.54% /患者年(15例),其中只有9例患者计划并成功进行了ViV TAVR。治疗后,所有患者的临床均有改善,经假体梯度显著降低,无主动脉瓣返流残留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信