Key factors of the influence of technocracy on the tendentious aspects of the development of democracy: a global dimension

V.V. Berch
{"title":"Key factors of the influence of technocracy on the tendentious aspects of the development of democracy: a global dimension","authors":"V.V. Berch","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scientific article examines the key factors of the influence of technocracy on the tendentious aspects of the development of democracy.It has been established that the form of government and the peculiarities of the choice of value approaches to empowering individuals with the powers to form and implement state policy affect the development of democratic processes in one or another state.It is emphasized that during the last few years, anxiety about the future of democracy has spread throughout the world. Scholars have documented a global “democratic recession” and argue that even long-established “consolidated” democracies may be losing their commitment to freedom and leaning toward more authoritarian policies.It has been determined that pro-democratic attitudes co-exist to varying degrees with openness to non-democratic forms of government, including the rule of a strong leader, experts or the military. Even in established democracies, non-democratic models find some support. Although commitment to representative democracy is relatively high in affluent, strong democracies, significant minorities in such countries are open to non-democratic alternatives.Emphasized, technocracy is a model of governance in which decision-makers are elected to office based on their expertise and expertise in a particular field. In practice, since technocrats must always be appointed by some higher authority, the political structure and incentives that influence that authority will always also play a role in the selection of technocrats.It is clear that an official who is called a technocrat may not possess the political acumen or charisma normally expected of an elected politician. Instead, a technocrat can demonstrate more pragmatic and focused problem-solving skills in the political arena.In a state where citizens are guaranteed certain rights, technocrats may seek to encroach on them if they believe that the application of their specialized knowledge will satisfy a wider range of public interests. A technocrat can make decisions based on calculations of data, not based on the impact on the population, individual citizens or sections of the population.It has been established that in the modern world we have the opportunity to observe the phenomenon of digital technocracy. Noted, technical experts, artificial intelligence, rule many areas of politics in many parts of Europe. However, EU member states differ significantly in their approaches to privacy regulation, for example, in terms of setting privacy standards.","PeriodicalId":474211,"journal":{"name":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scientific article examines the key factors of the influence of technocracy on the tendentious aspects of the development of democracy.It has been established that the form of government and the peculiarities of the choice of value approaches to empowering individuals with the powers to form and implement state policy affect the development of democratic processes in one or another state.It is emphasized that during the last few years, anxiety about the future of democracy has spread throughout the world. Scholars have documented a global “democratic recession” and argue that even long-established “consolidated” democracies may be losing their commitment to freedom and leaning toward more authoritarian policies.It has been determined that pro-democratic attitudes co-exist to varying degrees with openness to non-democratic forms of government, including the rule of a strong leader, experts or the military. Even in established democracies, non-democratic models find some support. Although commitment to representative democracy is relatively high in affluent, strong democracies, significant minorities in such countries are open to non-democratic alternatives.Emphasized, technocracy is a model of governance in which decision-makers are elected to office based on their expertise and expertise in a particular field. In practice, since technocrats must always be appointed by some higher authority, the political structure and incentives that influence that authority will always also play a role in the selection of technocrats.It is clear that an official who is called a technocrat may not possess the political acumen or charisma normally expected of an elected politician. Instead, a technocrat can demonstrate more pragmatic and focused problem-solving skills in the political arena.In a state where citizens are guaranteed certain rights, technocrats may seek to encroach on them if they believe that the application of their specialized knowledge will satisfy a wider range of public interests. A technocrat can make decisions based on calculations of data, not based on the impact on the population, individual citizens or sections of the population.It has been established that in the modern world we have the opportunity to observe the phenomenon of digital technocracy. Noted, technical experts, artificial intelligence, rule many areas of politics in many parts of Europe. However, EU member states differ significantly in their approaches to privacy regulation, for example, in terms of setting privacy standards.
技术统治对民主发展的倾向方面的影响的关键因素:全球层面
这篇科学文章考察了技术统治对民主发展的倾向方面的影响的关键因素。已经确定的是,政府的形式和选择赋予个人制定和执行国家政策的权力的价值方法的特点影响着一个或另一个国家民主进程的发展。有人强调,在过去几年中,对民主前途的忧虑已蔓延到全世界。学者们记录了一场全球性的“民主衰退”,并认为即使是建立已久的“巩固的”民主国家也可能正在失去对自由的承诺,并倾向于更专制的政策。人们已经确定,亲民主的态度在不同程度上与对非民主形式的政府的开放共存,包括一个强有力的领导人、专家或军队的统治。即使在老牌民主国家,非民主模式也得到了一些支持。虽然富裕、强大的民主国家对代议制民主的承诺相对较高,但在这些国家中,有相当多的少数人对非民主的选择持开放态度。强调的是,技术统治是一种管理模式,在这种模式中,决策者是根据他们在某一特定领域的专门知识和专门知识当选的。实际上,由于技术官僚必须总是由某种更高的权威任命,因此影响该权威的政治结构和激励措施也总是在选择技术官僚方面发挥作用。很明显,被称为技术官僚的官员可能不具备通常期望的民选政治家所具备的政治敏锐度或魅力。相反,技术官僚可以在政治舞台上展示出更务实、更专注的解决问题的能力。在一个公民享有某些权利的国家,如果技术官僚认为运用他们的专业知识将满足更广泛的公共利益,他们可能会寻求侵犯这些权利。技术官僚可以根据数据计算做出决策,而不是根据对人口、个别公民或部分人口的影响。已经确定的是,在现代世界中,我们有机会观察到数字技术统治的现象。注意,技术专家,人工智能,统治了欧洲许多地区的许多政治领域。然而,欧盟成员国在隐私监管方面存在显著差异,例如在制定隐私标准方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信