Conciliation procedures in the resolution of labour disputes

O.E. Lutsenko
{"title":"Conciliation procedures in the resolution of labour disputes","authors":"O.E. Lutsenko","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been emphasized in the article that many employees and employers increasingly choose alternative methods of labour dispute resolution (alternative dispute resolution – ADR) – conciliation procedures, such as mediation. ADR offers a means of ensuring justice in the workplace for more workers at a lower cost and helps to “clean up” the backlog of statutory dispute resolution institutions, and thus helps public institutions to meet society’s need for labour dispute resolution more effectively.The author has drawn attention to the fact that historically, organizations responded to conflict only when it arose; they did not develop planning by conflict. However, today the situation has changed dramatically and organizations are increasingly implementing dispute resolution planning systems, which represent a systematic approach to conflict prevention, management and resolution that focuses on the cause of conflict within the organization.The author has concluded that the important features of project systems for resolving labour disputes – ADR are: 1) to help resolve labour disputes/conflicts, bringing common sense, goodwill and professionalism to the fore; 2) to provide a safe environment for expressing one’s positions, because disagreements and problems must be freely highlighted; 3) stimulate a clear and balanced decision, which should be the product of a free and constructive discussion, in which everyone has the opportunity to express their position freely and without hesitation.The author has summarized that the introduction of ADR in the organization, the resolution of internal complaints, disciplinary procedures and the implementation of the conflict management system has a number of advantages. These include: greater transparency of workplace procedures, procedural flexibility, efficiency and confidentiality that ensures party confidentiality and protects the organization’s reputation. ADR can also offer greater “sensitivity” to the needs of a particular workplace and especially its employees in highly sensitive and personal disputes, such as claims of sexual harassment, harassment, mobbing, etc. In addition, in facilitating consultative ADR processes, an agreement reached in a workplace dispute may contain a wide range of new outcomes that are not normally part of a court decision, and which may provide conflict resolution options that better suit the needs of each party.","PeriodicalId":474211,"journal":{"name":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been emphasized in the article that many employees and employers increasingly choose alternative methods of labour dispute resolution (alternative dispute resolution – ADR) – conciliation procedures, such as mediation. ADR offers a means of ensuring justice in the workplace for more workers at a lower cost and helps to “clean up” the backlog of statutory dispute resolution institutions, and thus helps public institutions to meet society’s need for labour dispute resolution more effectively.The author has drawn attention to the fact that historically, organizations responded to conflict only when it arose; they did not develop planning by conflict. However, today the situation has changed dramatically and organizations are increasingly implementing dispute resolution planning systems, which represent a systematic approach to conflict prevention, management and resolution that focuses on the cause of conflict within the organization.The author has concluded that the important features of project systems for resolving labour disputes – ADR are: 1) to help resolve labour disputes/conflicts, bringing common sense, goodwill and professionalism to the fore; 2) to provide a safe environment for expressing one’s positions, because disagreements and problems must be freely highlighted; 3) stimulate a clear and balanced decision, which should be the product of a free and constructive discussion, in which everyone has the opportunity to express their position freely and without hesitation.The author has summarized that the introduction of ADR in the organization, the resolution of internal complaints, disciplinary procedures and the implementation of the conflict management system has a number of advantages. These include: greater transparency of workplace procedures, procedural flexibility, efficiency and confidentiality that ensures party confidentiality and protects the organization’s reputation. ADR can also offer greater “sensitivity” to the needs of a particular workplace and especially its employees in highly sensitive and personal disputes, such as claims of sexual harassment, harassment, mobbing, etc. In addition, in facilitating consultative ADR processes, an agreement reached in a workplace dispute may contain a wide range of new outcomes that are not normally part of a court decision, and which may provide conflict resolution options that better suit the needs of each party.
解决劳资纠纷的调解程序
该条强调,许多雇员和雇主越来越多地选择解决劳动争议的其他方法(替代性争端解决办法- ADR) -调解程序,例如调解。ADR以较低的成本为更多工人提供了一种确保工作场所正义的手段,并有助于“清理”法定争议解决机构的积压,从而帮助公共机构更有效地满足社会对劳资争议解决的需求。作者提请注意这样一个事实,即从历史上看,组织只在冲突出现时才对其作出反应;他们没有在冲突中制定计划。然而,今天的情况发生了巨大的变化,组织越来越多地实施争端解决计划系统,这代表了一种系统的方法来预防冲突,管理和解决,重点是组织内部冲突的原因。作者总结了解决劳资纠纷的项目制度——ADR的重要特征是:1)帮助解决劳资纠纷/冲突,将常识、善意和专业精神发挥出来;2)为表达自己的立场提供一个安全的环境,因为分歧和问题必须自由地突出;3)促进一个明确和平衡的决定,这应该是自由和建设性讨论的产物,每个人都有机会自由地、毫不犹豫地表达自己的立场。笔者总结认为,在组织中引入ADR、解决内部投诉、纪律处分程序和实施冲突管理制度具有诸多优势。这些措施包括:提高工作场所程序的透明度、程序的灵活性、效率和保密性,确保当事人保密并保护组织的声誉。ADR还可以对特定工作场所的需求提供更大的“敏感性”,特别是在高度敏感的个人纠纷中,例如性骚扰、骚扰、围捕等索赔。此外,为了促进协商性ADR程序,在工作场所争议中达成的协议可能包含广泛的新结果,这些结果通常不是法院判决的一部分,并且可能提供更适合各方需求的冲突解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信