On reforms of economic judiciary in the light of new concepts

O.P. Podtserkovnyi
{"title":"On reforms of economic judiciary in the light of new concepts","authors":"O.P. Podtserkovnyi","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the problems of reforming the judicial system, taking into account the «Concept of reforming the judicial system with the aim of improving access to justice», presented in July 2023 by the Research Service of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Positive expectations from the liquidation of commercial courts of first and second instance are denied. It is emphasized that the introduction of sections for consideration of economic disputes at local courts will lead to the degradation of judicial standards demonstrated by economic courts, including compliance with procedural terms.The possibility of solving the problem of excessive burden on local courts by increasing the burden on specialized judges, which will only lead to a decrease in the quality of justice in economic litigation, has been refuted. More reasonable measures to simplify court procedures and promote out-of-court resolution of legal conflicts, as well as to fill the numerous vacancies of local court judges, are justified.Solving the problems of the judiciary is connected with overcoming the shortcomings of the procedural codes and anti-corruption policy of the state, and not with the structuring of judicial bodies.The priority objects of judicial reform have been identified: restoration of public trust in the judicial branch of government, compliance with the deadlines for consideration of cases in the system of general and administrative courts, compliance with the principles of independence of judges from state bodies, proper financing of the court apparatus and decent remuneration for the work of assistant judges and secretaries, prevention of groundless lawsuits and self-limitation of state bodies in violating the rights of private individuals, prevention of abuse of state bodies in appealing court decisions, introduction of a mechanism for mass mediation, insufficient stimulation of alternative dispute resolution methods capable of reducing the number of court cases.It is proposed to use the experience of international commercial arbitration in the improvement of economic justice.","PeriodicalId":474211,"journal":{"name":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the problems of reforming the judicial system, taking into account the «Concept of reforming the judicial system with the aim of improving access to justice», presented in July 2023 by the Research Service of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Positive expectations from the liquidation of commercial courts of first and second instance are denied. It is emphasized that the introduction of sections for consideration of economic disputes at local courts will lead to the degradation of judicial standards demonstrated by economic courts, including compliance with procedural terms.The possibility of solving the problem of excessive burden on local courts by increasing the burden on specialized judges, which will only lead to a decrease in the quality of justice in economic litigation, has been refuted. More reasonable measures to simplify court procedures and promote out-of-court resolution of legal conflicts, as well as to fill the numerous vacancies of local court judges, are justified.Solving the problems of the judiciary is connected with overcoming the shortcomings of the procedural codes and anti-corruption policy of the state, and not with the structuring of judicial bodies.The priority objects of judicial reform have been identified: restoration of public trust in the judicial branch of government, compliance with the deadlines for consideration of cases in the system of general and administrative courts, compliance with the principles of independence of judges from state bodies, proper financing of the court apparatus and decent remuneration for the work of assistant judges and secretaries, prevention of groundless lawsuits and self-limitation of state bodies in violating the rights of private individuals, prevention of abuse of state bodies in appealing court decisions, introduction of a mechanism for mass mediation, insufficient stimulation of alternative dispute resolution methods capable of reducing the number of court cases.It is proposed to use the experience of international commercial arbitration in the improvement of economic justice.
新观念视野下的经济司法改革
本文考虑到乌克兰最高拉达研究处于2023年7月提出的“旨在改善诉诸司法的司法制度改革构想”,审查了司法制度改革的问题。对一审和二审商事法庭清算的积极期望被否定了。有人强调,在地方法院引入审议经济争端的章节将导致经济法院所显示的司法标准,包括对程序条件的遵守情况的降低。有人指出,如果通过增加专门法官的负担来解决地方法院负担过重的问题,只会导致经济诉讼的司法质量下降。有理由采取更合理的措施,简化法庭程序,促进庭外解决法律冲突,以及填补地方法院法官的众多空缺。解决司法问题与克服国家程序法和反腐败政策的缺点有关,而与司法机构的结构无关。已经确定了司法改革的优先对象:恢复公众对政府司法部门的信任,遵守一般法院和行政法院系统审理案件的最后期限,遵守法官独立于国家机关的原则,为法院机构提供适当的经费,并为助理法官和秘书的工作提供体面的报酬,防止国家机关侵犯个人权利的无端诉讼和自我限制,防止滥用国家机构对法院判决提出上诉,采用大规模调解机制,充分鼓励能够减少法院案件数量的替代性争端解决方法。建议借鉴国际商事仲裁的经验,促进经济公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信