Effectiveness of judicial protection methods of the rights of a corporate agreement parties: experience of foreign countries

L.N. Doroshenko
{"title":"Effectiveness of judicial protection methods of the rights of a corporate agreement parties: experience of foreign countries","authors":"L.N. Doroshenko","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is focused on studying the effectiveness of judicial protection methods of the rights of a corporate agreement parties in foreign legal systems. The author of the paper has analyzed legislative tendencies to reduce the list of possible methods of protecting the violated rights of a corporate agreement parties, defined by the latest corporate legislation compared to the previous Law of Ukraine “On Joint-Stock Companies”. New approaches in domestic judicial caselaw regarding choosing an effective method to protect the violated right by using the principle “the court knows the laws” have been studied. The author has formulated the factors that should be regarded while choosing the method of protection of the violated right, namely: a) it is necessary to use exclusively an appropriate method of protecting the violated right (established by law or a corporate agreement), which corresponds to the consequences of the violation and whose choice belongs to a plaintiff; b) such a method of protection must be effective. It has been systematized that the methods of protecting the violated rights of a corporate contract parties in foreign legal systems are divided into three groups: 1) mandatory (collection of penalties, damages, compensation), 2) corporate-binding (rescission of a contract) and 3) corporate (invalidation of a business entity decisions that violate the terms of the corporate agreement concluded by all participants). The author has analyzed such methods of protecting the rights of a corporate contract parties in foreign legal systems as compensation for damages, collection of penalties and stipulated damages, payment of compensation, enforcement of obligations in kind, etc. The necessity of harmonizing the national legislation in regard to a corporate agreement with a foreign method has been argued, in particular, the introduction of such a method of protecting the rights of a corporate agreement parties as compensation into Ukrainian legislation. It has been concluded on the basis of the conducted research that the list of the most effective methods of protecting the rights of a corporate agreement parties should be enshrined in the legislation, such as: compensation for damages, collection of penalties, collection of stipulated damages, payment of compensation, rescission of a corporate contract agreement or its certain parts, etc.","PeriodicalId":474211,"journal":{"name":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is focused on studying the effectiveness of judicial protection methods of the rights of a corporate agreement parties in foreign legal systems. The author of the paper has analyzed legislative tendencies to reduce the list of possible methods of protecting the violated rights of a corporate agreement parties, defined by the latest corporate legislation compared to the previous Law of Ukraine “On Joint-Stock Companies”. New approaches in domestic judicial caselaw regarding choosing an effective method to protect the violated right by using the principle “the court knows the laws” have been studied. The author has formulated the factors that should be regarded while choosing the method of protection of the violated right, namely: a) it is necessary to use exclusively an appropriate method of protecting the violated right (established by law or a corporate agreement), which corresponds to the consequences of the violation and whose choice belongs to a plaintiff; b) such a method of protection must be effective. It has been systematized that the methods of protecting the violated rights of a corporate contract parties in foreign legal systems are divided into three groups: 1) mandatory (collection of penalties, damages, compensation), 2) corporate-binding (rescission of a contract) and 3) corporate (invalidation of a business entity decisions that violate the terms of the corporate agreement concluded by all participants). The author has analyzed such methods of protecting the rights of a corporate contract parties in foreign legal systems as compensation for damages, collection of penalties and stipulated damages, payment of compensation, enforcement of obligations in kind, etc. The necessity of harmonizing the national legislation in regard to a corporate agreement with a foreign method has been argued, in particular, the introduction of such a method of protecting the rights of a corporate agreement parties as compensation into Ukrainian legislation. It has been concluded on the basis of the conducted research that the list of the most effective methods of protecting the rights of a corporate agreement parties should be enshrined in the legislation, such as: compensation for damages, collection of penalties, collection of stipulated damages, payment of compensation, rescission of a corporate contract agreement or its certain parts, etc.
公司协议当事人权利司法保护方法的有效性:国外经验
本文主要研究国外法系对公司协议当事人权利的司法保护方法的有效性。本文的作者分析了立法倾向,以减少保护公司协议方被侵犯权利的可能方法清单,由最新的公司立法与之前的乌克兰法律“股份公司”相比较。国内司法判例研究了运用“法院通法”原则选择有效方式保护受侵害权利的新途径。笔者阐述了在选择侵权权利保护方式时应考虑的因素,即:a)必须专门使用一种与侵权后果相对应的适当的侵权权利保护方式(法律或公司协议规定的),且该方式的选择属于原告;B)这种保护方法必须是有效的。国外法系对公司合同当事人被侵犯权利的保护方法已被系统化地分为三类:1)强制性(收取罚金、损害赔偿、补偿金),2)公司约束性(合同的解除)和3)法人(违反所有参与者签订的公司协议条款的企业实体决定的无效)。笔者分析了国外法系公司合同当事人权利保护的方式,包括损害赔偿、罚金和约定损害赔偿的征收、赔偿的支付、实物义务的执行等。有人认为有必要使关于公司协定的国家立法与外国方法相协调,特别是在乌克兰立法中引入这种保护公司协定当事方权利作为补偿的方法。在进行研究的基础上,认为应在立法中列出保护公司合同当事人权利的最有效方法,如:损害赔偿、收取罚金、收取规定的损害赔偿、支付赔偿金、解除公司合同协议或其某些部分等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信